370 likes | 739 Views
Visual Imagery. Solving problems through imagery. What shape are mickey mouse’s ears? How many windows are there in your apartment? Which is a darker red – a cherry or an apple? What is the shortest path from RH101 to Phoenix Grill?. Study of Imagery. Banned by behaviorists
E N D
Solving problems through imagery • What shape are mickey mouse’s ears? • How many windows are there in your apartment? • Which is a darker red – a cherry or an apple? • What is the shortest path from RH101 to Phoenix Grill?
Study of Imagery • Banned by behaviorists • Possible subject of study in cognitive psychology • Cognitive psychology is distinguished from the earlier behaviorism by its claim that there are internal representations of knowledge on which the mind operates • However, this is a difficult area of study • Mental images are subjective • How can we show that images are used? • How are they represented? Stephen Kosslyn (did much of the research on mental imagery)
How are mental images represented? • The analog vs. propositional debate • analog: the representation has the same structure as the thing represented • propositional: a sentence-like description of the image, non-spatial • Most studies mentioned seem to argue for analog representations (e.g., mental rotation, brain imaging studies). Yet mental images are not processed exactly the same as visual images
Analog Images vs. Propositions Imagine: The can is on the box. The can is black Analog Propositions on( can, box ) black( can )
Some Questions about Mental Images • What is the relationship between imagery and perception? • How are mental images processed and transformed?
Imagery in Neural Networks • Mental images in neural networks can be produced by running the network “in reverse” -- activate class nodes (e.g. digit “3”) and running activation downwards to the input nodes output (e.g. digit class) hidden nodes input
Imagery & Perception • If the mechanisms used to perceive stimuli are also used to generate mental images, then we should predict: • Mental images should be quasy pictorial • Mental images should activate some of the brain areas involved with visual processing
Just as in visual images, level of detail in mental images can vary Imagine a bee next to a rabbit Imagine a elephant standing next to a rabbit Does a rabbit have eyebrows? Does a rabbit have eyebrows?
Shrinking mental images with brain damage Before surgery After surgery
Finke and Kosslyn (1980) experiment fixation dot separation Angle of separation Experiment measures field of resolution: the angle of separation into the visual periphery where you cannot distinguish dots any longer
Fields of resolution are similar in perception and imagery Horizontal and vertical fields of resolution in perception and imagery as a function of dot separation and vividness of imagery. Data from Finke and Kosslyn (1980).
Visual Imagery and Hemispatial Neglect Mental images from opposite sides of an imagined public landmark (Bisiach and Luzzatti, 1978)
Evidence from brain imaging (fMRI) for involvement of visual processing areas during visual imagery (Le Bihan et al., 1993)
Mental Rotation • Can mental images be transformed in a way analagous to physical objects? How could we tell? • Mental rotation task: look at the time it takes to rotate two shapes into correspondence • Demo experiment:http://bjornson.inhb.de/?p=55
Example Trials same different different different same different different different
linear relationship between angle of rotation and reaction time in object comparison The mental process seems to be analogous to the physical process of rotation. Results
Are visual images also subject to visual illusions? Ponzo Illusion Imagine an inverted “V” over these lines.Which horizontal line is longer? Which horizontal line is longer?
Differences between pictures and mental images • Mental images are more difficult to be reinterpreted • Mental image = perception + interpretation • Strong influence of conceptual knowledge on imagery • Simplification of object models • Distortions in cognitive maps
Imagery and Ambiguous Figures What would this object look like when rotated 90 degrees?
Imagery and Ambiguous Figures • If you see one interpretation, it is very difficult to then imagine the other interpretation (unless you are trained in this task) • One difference between imagery and visual perception: visual images, unlike mental images, can be easily reinterpreted
Mental Images might miss important aspects of object being imagined • Imagine you have a cube between your thumb and index finger. One corner of the cube touches your thumb, and the diagonally opposite corner touches your index finger. Now, point to the locations of the rest of the corners in space. Many people point (incorrectly) to four points on the same plane half way between the top and bottom corners. Correct Solution:
Imagine this object • Does this figure contain a parallelogram? • no • yes • not sure • what is a parallelogram??
Which is further west? • atlantic entrance to the panama canal • pacific entrance to the panama canal
Which is further east? • Florida • Chile
Which is further south: • Philadelphia • Rome
Which is further east? a) Reno b) San Diego
Cognitive maps are affected by conceptual knowledge • Relative locations of small regions is determined by a conceptualization of larger regions. • Line of reasoning: • Nevada is east of California • Reno is in Nevada, San Diego in California, • Therefore, Reno must be east of San Diego
Experimental evidence for hierarchical organization in cognitive maps • Ss. study maps. Later, from memory, they judge relative position of locations x and y • Performance was better when superordinate information was congruent with question Congruent Incongruent (Stevens and Coupe, 1978)
Summary • Imagined information is processed in similar ways to perceptual information • Neuroscience evidence (fMRI) • Neuropsychological evidence • Behavioral evidence: • Kosslyn studies/ Scanning studies • Mental rotation • Some visual illusions • But there are also differences: • Mental images are difficult to reinterpret • Cognitive distortions in mental maps
Example Question (1) • Stevens and Coupe’s (1978) studied spatial judgments of cities where subjects studied maps of cities in “alpha-county” and “beta-county”. They showed that: • A. people are more accurate at judging the relative positions of cities if the superordinate information is congruent. • B. people use route knowledge but not survey knowledge to make spatial judgments. • C. people use analog representations but not propositional representations to make spatial judgments. • D. people are more accurate at judging the relative positions of cities if they rely on hierarchical information.
Example Question (2) • Suppose you do a study where people imagine a rabbit next to an elephant. It will probably take ________ to find the whiskers on the rabbit, relative to when people imagine a rabbit next to an ant. • A. the same amount of time • B. more time • C. less time • D. Details can't be seen on mental images.
Example Question (3) • Suppose you do a study where people imagine a rabbit next to an elephant. It will probably take ________ to find the whiskers on the rabbit, relative to when people imagine a rabbit next to an ant. • A. the same amount of time • B. more time • C. less time • D. Details can't be seen on mental images.
Example Question (4) The neuroscience evidence on the imagery question shows that • A. imagery and perception involve entirely different neural processes • B. during mental imagery, some portions of the visual processing regions of the cortex seem to be activated. • C. the primary similarity between imagery and perception is that the visual receptors in the retina are stimulated in both cases. • D. the neuroscience research in this area has a major problem with demand characteristics, so we cannot draw clear-cut conclusions.