1 / 4

PVT Requirements

PVT Requirements. CERN, 11/05/2011 P. Azzi (INFN-PD) G. Della Ricca (UNI-TS & INFN-TS). Role of PVT – why we are here?.

cleary
Download Presentation

PVT Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PVT Requirements CERN, 11/05/2011 P. Azzi (INFN-PD) G. Della Ricca (UNI-TS & INFN-TS)

  2. P. Azzi, G. Della Ricca - Monitoring WS Role of PVT – why we are here? • PVT has mainly a coordination role of many other workflows concerning Offline, Computing and Physics. So in short there are no direct monitoring requirements that we might ask for. • What we could do is signal how the monitoring of some specific workflows/project that are part of the PVT deliverable would improve things. • This will be very likely an overlap from the specific requests of the project themselves. Will have more details in specific talks (even if there was no time to agree beforehand.  ) • PVT main (operational) involvements: • Release Physics Validation before T0 deployment, data rereco, MC production • Data Reprocessing • Data Skimming • MonteCarlo production • Certification

  3. P. Azzi, G. Della Ricca - Monitoring WS How monitoring would help PVT • Release Physics Validation before T0 deployement, data rereco, MC production • Automatic validation of the release during building (RECO) • Pre-production now superseded by data RelVal: automatic validation using DQM for DPG,POG’s. On our side need to improve the PAG-DQM connection that would feed back in the same framework (Danilo’s work) • MC preproduction validation: used to be manually managed, now need to experience the new PREP framework for validation purposes. And see if we are missing some tools to help with the visualization of the degree of validation.

  4. P. Azzi, G. Della Ricca - Monitoring WS …continue • Data reprocessing: • Info about the jobs, events processed, etc very likely equivalent to DataOps needs • Skims: • Jobs, events processed, skim efficiency vs PD, size, # events…again very likely DataOps–like • MonteCarlo production: • Monitoring of the productions (jobs, failures, size… DataOps) • Bookeeping of validation results: might be solved by the new PREP, but we have not exercised it yet for the validation bookeeping. • Certification: • Automatization of DQM validation. • Monitoring of certified Lumi vs time ( now non consecutive run list)

More Related