190 likes | 397 Views
PROFFESSIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB ADMINISTRATION STRUCTURE by SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES. Polat ÇAKIROĞLU 055106. OUTLINE. Development Phase Ontology ScreenShots of Protégé and SWOOP Small Demonstartion of Jambalaya Conclusion References. Development Phase.
E N D
PROFFESSIONAL FOOTBALL CLUB ADMINISTRATION STRUCTUREbySEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES Polat ÇAKIROĞLU 055106
OUTLINE • Development Phase • Ontology • ScreenShots of Protégé and SWOOP • Small Demonstartion of Jambalaya • Conclusion • References
Development Phase • I have used the full version of Protégé 3.2 which is about 73,3 Mbytes including all suitable plug-ins and standart API of Protégé for implementing this ontology. • Also I have tried my code on SWOOP 2.2.1 with its ontology interface for controlling my code on different softwares. • I have used Protégé because its API is very user friendly and defining classes, properties, individuals and relations between these things are very easy with it.
Development Phase (Contd) • I have searched the subject on different sources and tried to realize the most common approach. • Before starting implementation phase of the ontology first of all I have draw up preliminary sketch of structure on papers.
Development Phase (Contd)(Implementation) • The classes and their subclasses are defined by using the “OWL Classes” tab. • Then the properties are defined using the “Properties” tab. • At the end I have specified the individuals by using the “Individuals” tab.
Ontology • In this subject all of the structure is shaped under only one header that is Club. So i have used only one superclass for the whole ontology named “Club”. • Naturally all of the other classes are connected to this class with subclassOf property of rdfs.
Ontology(Jambalaya Query : General Administration with Individuals)
CONCLUSION • With this project i have tried to make it easy to get information about the most popular sport branch by using semantic web technology. • This area has a dynamic structure so it is changeable due to the success of the teams. Because of this, the Ontology needs more work for adapting such a dynamic structure.
References • http://www.galatasaray.org • http://www.bjk.com.tr • http://www.fenerbahce.org • http://www.w3.org • http://cmpe.emu.edu.tr/aelci/Courses/D-583/583-CSite-2006-Fall.htm
Links • Project Report • XML File of Project • OWL File of Project • Proposal of Project • Info About the Case • Open Project in Protégé • Info About SPARQL (12 October 2004) • Info About SPARQL (4 October 2006)