360 likes | 375 Views
This senior thesis presentation delves into the redesign of the lateral system for The Del Monte Center at North Shore in Pittsburgh, covering project overview, depth and breadth studies, construction management, mechanical aspects, and conclusions.
E N D
Traci Peterson Structural Option Senior Thesis Presentation The Del Monte Center at The North Shore The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Spring 2005
Outline of Presentation • Project overview • Depth Study • Redesign of lateral system • Architecture • Breadth Study • Construction management • Mechanical • Conclusions
The Del Monte Center at The North Shore 375 North Shore Drive, Pittsburgh, PA
Project Overview Pittsburgh's North Shore Location of Building
Project Overview • Building Statistics • Dates of Construction • Occupancy/Function • Size • Cost
Project Overview • Project Team • Continental/Nationwide Realty Investors • Strada • Continental Building Systems • Atlantic Engineering Services • Allen & Shariff Corporation • Limbach Facility services
Project Overview • Structural System • Frame • Foundation • Floor System
Project Overview 1” expansion joint
Project Overview • Lateral System • Bracing (North-South Direction): Frame E Location of Bracing: Frame D
Project Overview • Bracing (East-West Direction) Frame E Frame D Frames A & D Frames B & E Frames C & F
Depth Study • Lateral System Redesign • Alternative #1 • Alternative #2 • Exposed bracing • Modified windows
Depth Study • Design Criteria • Codes • Methods
Depth Study • Loads • Dead • Live • Snow • Wind • Seismic • Load combinations • 1.4D • 1.2D+1.6L+0.5S • 1.2D+1.6S+(0.5L or 0.8W) • 1.2D+1.6W+0.5L+0.5S
Depth Study • STAAD.pro 2002 • “Select Optimized” command
Depth Study • Existing System Frames A & D Frames B & E Frames C & F Total Weight of System = 426.7 k
Depth Study • Alternative #1- Moment Frames Frames A & D Frames B & E Frames C & F Total Weight of System = 358.5 k
Depth Study • Alternative #1- Moment Frames • Drift
Depth Study • Alternative #2- Full Bay Bracing Frames A & D Frames B & E Frames C & F Total Weight of System = 200.8 k
Depth Study • Results
Architecture • Alternative #2- chevrons • Modified Windows • Exposed Bracing
Architecture • Alternative #2 with modified windows
Architecture • Alternative #2 with exposed bracing
Breadth Study • Construction Management Cost of Structural Steel W-shapes:
Breadth Study • Construction Management • Existing beam to column connections • Given: • Bolted double angle • ASTM A325 ¾” slip-critical bolts • Designed for summation of: • ½ uniform load capacity of member • 10k axial force • Determined: • ¼” angle • 5 rows of bolts • $63 each
Breadth Study • Construction Management • Existing bracing connections • Given: • Bolted/welded shear end-plate connections • Fillet welds • Determined: • 3/16” weld • 2 rows of bolts • $55 each
Breadth Study • Construction Management • Moment connections • Determined: • Single-plate web connection: • 3/8” x 12” • 5 7/8” bolts • 2 5/16” fillet welds • Tension flange-plate: • 1” x 10-1/4” • 5/16” fillet welds (6” along each side, 10-1/4” along end) • Compression flange-plate: • 13/16” x 12.5” • 5/16” fillet weld (6” along each side) • No doublers or stiffeners required • $250 each
Breadth Study • Construction Management Total Cost of Connections (material, fabrication, & installation):
Breadth Study • Construction Management • Alternative #2, with modified windows Building Envelope Costs (as compared to existing design):
Breadth Study • Construction Management Total Costs:
Breadth Study • Mechanical • Carriers “Hourly Analysis Program 4.2” (HAP) • Mechanical system components • 10 packaged water-cooled air conditioning units • 2 cooling towers (1 for each unit) • 3 hydronic unit heaters • 2 hydronic cabinet unit heaters • 1 electric unit heater • 4 hot water boilers • Current utility rates • Department of Energys website
Breadth Study • Mechanical • Results of HAP analysis: • Annual energy costs savings = $2,856
Conclusions Total Costs: $112,780 - $101,681 = $11,000 $11,000 / ($2,856/year) = 4 years
Conclusions • Existing system is most expensive system studied • Least expensive system to build has chevron braces left exposed • Least expensive system over time has concealed chevron braces • Modifying windows disrupts architectural aesthetics of building • Moment frame system costs less than existing system, & preserves large windows • For moment frame system, recommendation is to increase expansion joint to 2”