1 / 12

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery. Eriko Fukuyama, MD. Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan. The author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster. Purpose.

clio
Download Presentation

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With LimbalRelaxingIncisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan The author has no financial interest in the subject matter of this e-poster.

  2. Purpose • To compare cylindrical changes between a toric intraocular lens (IOL) and limbal relaxing incisions (LRIs) to correct preexisting astigmatism in patients underwent cataract surgery.

  3. Patients • We prospectively reviewed the medical records of 20 patients who underwent primary cataract surgery for bilateral cataract with corneal astigmatism 1 dioptor and over at Fukuyama Eye Clinic from August 2009 to August 2010. They underwent implantation of a AcrySof IQ Toric IOL in one eye (group A) and with implantation of a AcrySof IQ IOL with LRIs in a fellow eye (group B). • Mean age :75.5±5.6 • Male : Female= 15 : 5

  4. Surgical Methods Group A： Incision: Coaxial MICS (2.4mm) IOL: ACRYSOF® IQ Toric aspheric IOL Group B： LRIs: Fukuyama LRI Nomogram, 1 Pair Incision: Coaxial MICS (2.4mm) IOL: ACRYSOF® IQ aspheric IOL

  5. Results • The mean corneal astigmatism measured by keratometer before the surgery was 1.89 dioptors in group A and 1.73 dioptors in group B. After the treatment, the mean corneal astigmatism was 1.89 dioptors in group A and 0.81 dioptors in group B, and the mean refraction astigmatism was 0.73 dioptors in group A and 0.51 dioptors in group B at six months after the surgery. • The UDVA and CDVA were similar in both groups. The corneal shape measured by topography was stabilized earlier in group A than in group B.

  6. Change in Corneal Cylinder (Keratometory) D (n=20) (n=20) ** **： Wilcoxon rank-sum test P Value<0.02 Post-Op

  7. Change in Refractive Cylinder D (n=20) (n=20) **： Wilcoxon rank-sum test P Value: 0.0034 ** Post-Op

  8. Induced Corneal Cylinder (via Topography) (n=20) (n=20) Change in induced corneal cylinder (D) Post-Op

  9. Change in Corneal Cylinder (Keratometory) LRIｓ T-IOL （D) （D) Corneal cylinder (Post-Op 6 Months Corneal cylinder (Post-Op 6 Months (n=20) (n=20) （D) （D) Corneal cylinder (Pre-Op) Corneal cylinder (Pre-Op) Corneal cylinder (Pre-Op)

  10. Change in Refractive Cylinder T-IOL LRIｓ （D) （D) Refractive cylinder (Post-Op 6 Months Refractive cylinder (Post-Op 6 Months (n=20) (n=20) （D) （D) Corneal cylinder (Pre-Op) Corneal cylinder (Pre-Op)

  11. Comparisonof Toric IOLs with LRIs

  12. Conclusion • Both a toric IOL and LRIs are useful to correct preexisting astigmatism in patients having cataract surgery. • A toric IOL excels LRIs in the early stabilization of the corneal shape.

More Related