230 likes | 343 Views
The Future of the Climate Regime in the Aftermath of the Bonn Agreement. Presentation at the Open Meeting of the Global Environmental Change Community Rio de Janeiro, 6 - 8 October 2001 by Dr. Hermann E. Ott Director, Climate Policy Division
E N D
The Future of the Climate Regime in the Aftermath of the Bonn Agreement Presentation at the Open Meeting of the Global Environmental Change Community Rio de Janeiro, 6 - 8 October 2001 by Dr. Hermann E. Ott Director, Climate Policy Division Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy
Before talking about the future we have to ask: What is the climate regime and is it working? Sorry, but this is not an academic question!
Institutionally? • step-by-step approach • umbrella convention • UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) • protocol with quantified targets • Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC • universal regime: • FCCC: 186 ratifications • Kyoto Protocol: 39 ratifications, 84 signatures
...more on institutions: • differentiated obligations for industrialised countries (5.17 % globally) • modified by Bonn Agreement: • reduced to 2.49 % by additional LULUCF activities (Article 3.4) • negotiations on further commitment periods scheduled to start in 2005
...and even more on institutions: • a functioning system for inventories • = reporting and monitoring • basis for compliance regime in KP, elaborated in Bonn Agreement • “Kyoto Mechanisms” • Emissions Trading, Joint Implementation, Clean Development Mechanism
Impacts?Behavioural Change? • not really quantifiable or discernible • considerable reductions in UK and Germany in anticipation of entry into force • industry has caught on but is not yet won • “impacts” so far largely psychological
Conclusion: All we’ve got is institutions!
This is no small progress, but difficulties in the process (like after The Hague) immediately threaten the regime as such! ...and of course: in troubled waters, proposals for alternative routes abound!
Proposals include: • abandon Kyoto process altogether! • 10 years of effort wasted...no alternatives put forward really • strictly voluntary measures • unfortunately did not work • global CO2 tax • mostly from US scientists - whose Govt fiercely opposes idea • policies and measures • great idea, but maybe not solely • intensity targets • petrify emission profiles, maybe good for developing countries • price caps • interesting, but environmentally flawed
Something to Remember:The Challenges of Climate Change • a most complex problem - diffuse, multi-layered, dispersed in time and space etc. etc.... • fundamental change in production & consumption • from the fossil/atomic age to solar age • from waste/abundance to efficiency/sufficiency • redistribution of wealth (nations/individuals) • new systemic body of international law • ...in a nutshell: • climate change is at heart of the sustainability agenda...
To remember as well: marvellous institutional novelties! • establishment of three complex international market mechanisms • strongest non-compliance procedure in international environmental law • first levy on international market transactions • first acknowledgement of principle of contraction and convergence
Kyoto should remain main show in town • indispensable as global framework • catalyst of political and industrial action • forum for creation of new international norms • let a thousand flowers blossom! • why not more regional approaches? • “IRENA”, “EREA” etc. for pushing renewables • liability: is there a case against oil companies? • international aviation fuel tax should be on agenda, inside or outside climate regime
...inside the climate regime: • short term issues: • COP 7 is not yet done... • first priority: ratification asap • European leadership will have to remain strong (even after September 11)
Longer Term Issues • improve the regime structure! • co-ordinate PAMs! • address equity! • co-operate with OPEC!
Improve regime structure: • reduction of issues • regime has become overloaded, KISS principle • reduction of complexity • majority voting urgently required • allow for different speeds (Arts 43/44 TEU) • improve institutional structure • continuous process of communication required
Co-ordination of PAMs • domestic implementation of policies and measures has been slow in most countries • fear of comparative disadvantages requires a co-ordinated approach • some prime candidates: • fiscal policy: co-ordinate carbon/energy taxes • dismantle climate adverse subsidies • harmonise efficiency standards • foster climate friendly public procurement
Equity: the key • the challenge: fair and equitable allocation • simple “grandfathering” will not do • process as well as substance are important • substance: a formula for allocation, based on transparent and sensible criteria • process: must be non-confrontational, without undue demands for “meaningful participation”
Co-operation with OPEC • oil price fluctuations between $20 and $40 per barrel severely obstruct rational climate policy • prices too low: no incentive to save energy • prices too high: deligitimize energy taxes etc. • revenues under CO2/energy taxes go exclusively to Northern governments • many forms of co-operation possible • from simple price control to • producer - consumer cartels • options should be explored
The Sky Trust Idea(from Peter Barnes: Who Owns the Sky?) • carbon emissions cap for country/region • upstream emissions trading (energy comp.) • revenues from permit sales go into trust • trust pays equal annual dividends to all citizens • problem: rather nation-based idea, difficult to implement at global level
Thank you / Obrigado! For more information go to http://www.wupperinst.org or mail to Hermann.Ott@wupperinst.org