120 likes | 341 Views
Current Activities. US TPSMG. Jan Roberson Steve Holloway AIA/Tri-Services San Antonio, TX 9-12 February 2004. Steve Holloway. Jan Roberson. Industry Co-Chair. DoD Co-Chair. Core Members. Steve Crowell Sandy Davis Charlie Gamble Joe Garner Paul Gold Linda Herrera Kevin Paulson
E N D
Current Activities US TPSMG Jan Roberson Steve Holloway AIA/Tri-Services San Antonio, TX 9-12 February 2004
Steve Holloway Jan Roberson Industry Co-Chair DoD Co-Chair Core Members Steve Crowell Sandy Davis Charlie Gamble Joe Garner Paul Gold Linda Herrera Kevin Paulson Denny Raitz* Bob Sharrer Wes Wojtowicz * Co-Vice Chair of AECMA TPSMG, Co-Chair of AECMA TPSMG Executive Committee and Official AIA Contact Point to AECMA TPSMG Interested Parties Organization
Organization (Cont’d) Land Working Group Sea Working Group Air Working Group Kevin Paulson Chair John Junod Chair Bill Wendel Chair Dave Beaupre Kate Bigg Joe Cannataro Shirley Fisher Michael Glazik Rich Gramly Carlton Hardy Angela Howard James Hughes Catherine Jackson Lisa Lawhorne Barbara Levister Hua Lin Margaret Lipsey William Melton Pushpa Merchant Mickey Mittag Dan Nerdig Alfred Oswald William Parker-Combes Gary Salomon Bruce Schanck Albert Smith Gary Spry Maj. Nate Sweetser Steve Wehrly Harry Whittacre Deanna Wiggins Richard Williams John Zibell Bill Bates Sandra Davis MSgt Danny Delaney Charlie Gamble Bill Garrity Rich Gramly MSgt Ian Halstead Steve Holloway CMSgt Mike Hushion Doug Knox Mike Morales MSgt Rob Nava CMSgt Joseph Oliveira Al Olswald Chet Proutie RJ Reynolds Jimmy Rizzo Bob Sharrer SMSgt Eugene Wasko Bill Wendel Joe Garner Bob Sharrer Barry Dube
Activities • US TPSMG formed during AIA Spring Conference • Co-Chairs named • Government – Steve Holloway • Industry – Jan Roberson • Guidance Document Developed • Connection point to International TPSMG is AIA representative • Structure of Group modeled after International TPSMG
Activities • First Teleconference Held 8 September 2003 • Formed Land, Sea, and Air Working Groups • Groups’ Charter is to Review Spec for Accommodation to US Needs and Generate Suggested Modifications • CPFs Will be Channeled Through AIA Representative to International TPSMG for Consideration in the Spec • October 2003 Report – Fall AIA Conference
Activities – Cont’d • First Face-To-Face Meeting Nov. 2003 in Dayton, Ohio • Membership Discussed • Sub-Group Activities Initiated • Formal Relationship to US EPWG Established • Reviewed Key Topics of Address • Dynamic Diagnostics – Define Criteria • Battle Damage Repair – Establish Placeholder in Spec and Define Criteria • Multi-Media – Establish Placeholder in Spec and Form Technical Group within US EPWG
Activities – Cont’d • Provided Tasking to Air, Land, and Sea Working Groups to Compare Existing Specs Against S1000D for Parts Data • Reviewed US CPFs in Conjunction with International CPFs • Reviewed US EPWG Report • Track CPFs • Track Rejected Requirements Needing Business Rules • Monthly Teleconferences Commence
Activities – Cont’d • January 2004 Telecom • US EPWG Report • Working Chapters on Logic Engine Submitted by International EPWG • Working Look and Feel Chapters • Land Working Group • Compilation of Parts Data Comparison • Worked S1000D Issues at IETM SMEC in Huntsville, AL
Activities - Cont’d • Air Group Initiates Means to Consolidate Working Groups’ Comments for Submittal to US TPSMG • Discussed DoD Funding Issues to Support this Effort
Activities – Cont’d • NAVSEA Meeting in D.C. in December included S1000D Tutorials Conducted by International TPSMG Members
Current • Face-To-Face Meeting 11 Feb 2004 • Work on scope definition for Dynamic Diagnostics • Clarification of CPF 2001-51US – Linking and Managing Data in the CSDB • Land, Sea, and Air Groups’ Report on Parts Data • CPF on US Paper Sizes • Outstanding Issues Resolved • CPF in Revision to allow any paper size – requires business rules
Summary • We have had a very busy 9 months • We have made a lot of progress on the • Planning for evaluation - leading to adoption • Organizing to include the stakeholders • Defining the steps in the evaluation • Building the pieces we know are missing • Now we need the resources to proceed. . .