140 likes | 147 Views
Explore the role of referent objects, national interests, and the state's stance in international security to understand how armed forces contribute to state security interests.
E N D
Security and Defence Policy of the State National (security) interests and the role of armed forces Operační program Vzdělávání pro konkurenceschopnostNázev projektu: Inovace magisterského studijního programu Fakulty ekonomiky a managementu Registrační číslo projektu: CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0326
Goalsoflecture • To introduceconceptsof referent object and itsimportanceforsecuritypolicy • To outlinethe role ofarmedforces in securityofanarchic systém oftheinternational relations • To informabouthistoricaldevelopmentofstate and its stance as sovereign unit in thesystemofinternational relations • To definenationalinterests and stateinterests, theirdivision, articulation, and content.
Referent objects • Securitization studies aims to understand "who securitizes (Securitizing actor), on what issues (threats), for whom (referent object), why, with what results, and not least, under what conditions. • Securitizing actor/agent: an entity that makes the securitizing move/statement; • Referent object: the object that is being threatened and needs to be protected; • Audience: the target of the securitization act that needs to be persuaded and accept the issue as a security threat.
Referent objects • Traditional approaches to international security usually focus on state actors and their military capacities to protect national security. • Humansecurity, a concept that makes the principle referent object of security the individual, not the state. • Nationalsecurity, defined as being linked to the state’s monopoly over use of force in a given territory and as a substrate of security that emphasizes the military and policing components of security
Referent objects • Traditional role ofstate as referent objectsincePeaceofWestphalia • Only western states are recognized -> allowed to collonizethe rest oftheworld • States are monopolicforusingofforce • Non-interference to otherstate´sissues • Internal and externalsovereignity
Nationalinterests • The national interest, often referred to by the French expression raison d'État (English: reason of State), is a country's goals and ambitions whether economic, military, or cultural. The concept is an important one in international relations where pursuit of the national interest is the foundation of the realist school. • The practice is first seen as being employed by France under the direction of its Chief Minister Cardinal Richelieu in the Thirty Years' War when it intervened on the Protestant side, despite its own Catholicism, to block the increasing power of the Holy Roman Emperor. • These notions became much criticized after the bloody debacle of the First World War, and some sought to replace the concept of the balance of power with the idea of collective security. • The events of World War II led to a rebirth of Realist and then Neo-realist thought, as international relations theorists re-emphasized the role of power in global governance
NationalSecurityInterest • InterestIn general, the constant focus of human being interest arising on the background of economic, political and psychological situation which encourages him based on their own needs and value orientation set for him important goals and fight to achieve them. In the area of policy analysis, the interest in the narrow sense is often seen as a goal, which surveyed object (individual, political institutions, the state, etc.) tries to achieve • The National InterestNational interest is in a certain time interval unwavering focus the state - created in the background of his domestic and foreign policy situation that encourages its elites, on the basis of character of the regime, needs and value orientation of the population which introduced some important goals for the state and strive to achieve them
NationalSecurityInterest • Vitalnational interests • They contain the basic program, whichisessential for the existence of the state. Without the defense of these interests would become meaningless and perished by. The most common is the vital interests of preserving the sovereignty, territorial integrity, political system, the protection of a nation or ethnic group. They are permanent,in time only minimally variable. In their defense, the state is willing to use all means, including military force • Strategic national interests • Represents a supportive and less important interests and existence the stateis not depending onthem. The defense of strategic interests helps to defend the interests of the living. Strategic national interests are changing over time, a relatively short-term. Example couldbeanefforts for membership in international organizations
Powerofstate • Energy and costs spend in defending national ambitions are proportional to the state ambitions (from simple survival in the anarchic system of international relations to dominance) • Power position of the state ("state power", "power potential") is critical to the ability to pursue its interests ("ease / difficulty") • When position (power) of state is stronger, is easier to promote its interests at the expense of other actors in the system of international relations
Powerofstate Hans Morgenthau ("Politics Among Nations, 1948") evaluates the power of the state according to the following criteria: I. MATERIAL FACTORS OF POWER:a) geographic location as the moststable factor of the statepower b) natural resources as measured by the ability to self-supply and self-sufficiency c) industrial capacity d) military readiness, which is the current expression of the preceding factors (degree of military readiness is determined by technological innovation arms race, the quality of leadership and the quality and quantity of the armed forces) e) quantity of population
Powerofstate II. SPIRITUAL POWER FACTORS: • the qualitative aspect of population • the quality of the government, especially the level of foreign policy (the government's ability to use real material potential of the country's foreign policy, as it can be placed in line potentials and foreign policy objectives and how they can provide support to domestic and foreign public its foreign policy) • the level diplomacy (quality of cadres and the ability to define and promote the national interests of the practical foreign policy) • the level of military cadres • national morale, which is the expression ofcommitment levelto the public to promote national interests
Powerofstate • Hans Morgenthau („PoliticsAmongNations, 1948“) – the concept of political realism, presenting a realist view of power politics. This concept played a major role in the foreign policy of the United States, which made it exercise globe-spanning power in the Cold War period. The concept also called for a reconciliation of power politics with the idealistic ethics of earlier American discussions about foreign policy. • "The statesman must think in terms of the national interest, conceived as power among other powers. The popular mind, unaware of the fine distinctions of the statesman's thinking, reasons more often than not in the simple moralistic and legalistic terms of absolute good and absolute evil.„
MilitaryReadiness Describes the military power of the state, the quality and quantity of its armed forces. The aim is to build a state of such military potential, which would be sufficient capacity to defend and pursue its national interests, but also one that would not damage other spheres of the state life (especially the economic sphere - see the USSR, North Korea, etc.) • China 1.6 million • India 1.3 million • North Korea 1 million • Pakistan 620 000 • South Korea 560 000 • Turkey 550 000 • USA 520 000, Vietnam 450 000, Russia 400 000, Iran 350 000
Security and Defence Policy of the State National (security) interests and the role of armed forces Operační program Vzdělávání pro konkurenceschopnostNázev projektu: Inovace magisterského studijního programu Fakulty ekonomiky a managementu Registrační číslo projektu: CZ.1.07/2.2.00/28.0326