120 likes | 212 Views
energy resolution and uniformity. EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS /PS. Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008. SPS-1/2 runs (e data): (AliRoot analysis, using trunk version as of Feb.20).
E N D
energy resolution and uniformity EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 SPS-1/2 runs (e data): (AliRoot analysis, using trunk version as of Feb.20) containing all changes from Jennifer++ energy resolution @different positions: (14) 6 positions 5-100 GeV electrons resolution of beam energy different collimator settings @60-100GeV uniformity of energy response with 80GeV electrons module&tower centers, module borders caveats: (relative) tower-to-tower re-calibration first point on ToDo list
energy resolution @diff. positions EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS run371 @80 GeV run589 @80 GeV Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 ‘good’ calibration ‘bad’ calibration (relative) re-calibration needed (on ToDo list)
energy resolution @diff. positions EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS single position resolution Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 only ‘good’ calibrations: 14 6 positions
energy resolution @diff. positions EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS single position resolution Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 only ‘good’ calibrations: 14 6 positions Alexei’s values (June08) summing all SPS-1 runs after re-calibration
linearity @diff. positions EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 only ‘good’ calibrations: 14 6 positions ~ (still) factor 0.8 off … any idea ?
EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS beam energy resolution Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 determined by position of momentum defining collimators C3, C8: with DC3/DC8 … full width opening of the collimators [mm] factor 19.4% … vertical momentum dispersion of beam at C3 compared to C8 DC3/8 standard settings @SPS: ±30 mm: 0.7% @ ±10 mm rms:
beam energy resolution EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS single position resolution Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 determined by position of momentum defining collimators C3, C8: standard settings: C3/C8 @30 mm C3/C8 @10 mm (run727,28,34)
uniformity of response EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 rear view position scan 80 GeV electron beam module centers tower centers module/tower borders processing…
uniformity of response EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 80 GeV electron beam: position scan ToDo: (relative) re-calibration; correction for time dependence (temp) of gain module centers tower centers module borders 3% variation 2.4% resolution from Alexei after recalibration
EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS for discussion: gain jumps Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 • reconstructed energy > incident energy: run725 @80GeV run726 @60GeV mean: 100 GeV mean: 120 GeV no ‘extreme’ temperature behaviour observed… any hint ?
EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS an interesting point… Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 80GeV incident beam energy ‘MC’ calib data base ‘test beam’ calib data base factor 0.8 off
EMCAL test beam 2007 @cern SPS/PS ToDo Delia Hasch emcal meeting Nantes 15-17/07/2008 relative tower –to- tower calibration for both energy scans and uniformity studies : iterative from data at module centers using events with 4 cells per cluster ‘cross check’ with data at tower centers / mip calibration (see Marie’s studies) / re-calib from Alexei … apply temperature gain corrections for uniformity studies using correction routine from David