140 likes | 302 Views
Using Document Delivery Data for Selecting Medical Titles in a Large STM Library. 9th ILDS Conference Tallinn, Estonia. Presented by: Michael Ireland, A/Director CISTI Information Access and Delivery Directorate 2005-09-20. About CISTI. Making collection decisions based on usage.
E N D
Using Document Delivery Data for Selecting Medical Titles in a Large STM Library 9th ILDS ConferenceTallinn, Estonia • Presented by: • Michael Ireland, A/DirectorCISTI Information Access and Delivery Directorate • 2005-09-20
Making collection decisions based on usage • More recent collection studies on ILL/Document Delivery usage done using monograph data • Few studies looked both at serial usage AND serial gaps using ILL data as this study did.
2004 CISTI Collection Review - Usage Study • Key goals: • Assess CISTI’s serial collection strengths and weaknesses given recent budget constraints • Assess client need based on usage • Starting assumptions: • Collection met the core STM needs of clients • Emerging gaps developing in medical and business literature
Scope • Analyzed usage of current serials using Document Delivery order data • Analyzed unfilled serial orders for reason of “not held “
Current serials analysis • Gathered subject and bibliographic information on 8,666 serial titles • Gathered usage data on these titles based: • sample of 309,748 orders placed in 2003 • usage of the 3 main user groups (NRC staff, Canadians, international clients)
Collection Gap Analysis • Traditional ILL study of unfilled orders cancelled for reason of “not held “ • Sample of 6,171 orders of top unfilled 318 serial titles, those with >10 hits from 2003 to 2004 • Gathered subject, bibliographic and cost information on the 318 titles
Client validation to action • Groups telling CISTI there were collection gaps: • Canadian health library community • National Library of Medicine • NRC staff • Closing the gap • 135 more medical and health serial titles purchased • Collection Policy changed to allow for more medical and business literature
Best practices • Goals met and assumptions validated • Unique study successfully evaluated both collection strengths and weaknesses • Balancing client need with subject depth • Reusable method of evaluating the collection
Contacts • Michael Ireland michael.ireland@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca • Beverly (Bev) Brown, beverly.brown@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca • CISTI Website http://cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cisti_e.html