220 likes | 420 Views
Business Model Team Members. . CO Larry Ferguson, Team LeaderD1 John Barker D2 Dave Sheffield D3 Steve Corbitt D4 James Wolfe D5 Gary Bass D6 Margaret Callahan D7 Gloria Harmony CO Ken Leuderalbert Supporting members:D1
E N D
1. Business Model Team Executive Board
October 16, 2003
2. Business Model Team Members
3. Goal Implement the
FDOT Business Model
Statewide
4. Possible Approaches Training
Sterling
What We Value
Strategic Planning
Cascading Business Plans
Define Structure
Linkages
5. Business Model DeploymentStructure Organizational Deployment
Deploy business plans through organizations, follow chain of command.
Functional Deployment
Deploy business plans through functions.
6. Business Model Deployment Structure Organizational:
Deploy business plans through organizations,
follow chain-of command.
Advantages:
- Good management control.
Disadvantages:
- No linkage across entities.
- Difficult to expand functional goals.
- Not business result based.
7. Business Model Deployment Structure Functional:
Deploy business plans through functions.
Advantages:
-Strong linkages.
-Follows business results.
-Involves District in State plans.
Disadvantages: 26 Functions
-Senior managers not I.E. Materials, Design
directly involved.
8. FDOT Functions Core Processes
Plan Produce Maintain and Operate
Planning Design PTO
OMB Surveying Maintenance
Right-of-Way Traffic Operations
Deliver Consultant Mgmt. Safety
Construction EMO MCC
Materials PD+PM Tolls
9. FDOT Functions Support Functions
EOO Support Services
Human Resources Inspector General
General Counsel Contract/Prof. Services
Information Systems Public Information
Financial Services Performance Management
10. Functional Deploymentin Materials Tier 1. FDOT Plan
Strategic Objectives
FTP
Short Range Component
Tier 2.
Materials (Function) Plan
Organization Plans
Tier 3. Materials Units
District Materials
State Materials Office
11. Development of Materials Plan
12. Statewide Materials Plan Initial face-to-face meeting: September 2002
12-person team formed consisting of each District Materials Engineer, the State Materials Engineer, and State Materials Office key staff.
The plan format was adopted at this meeting.
(See Attachment 4.)
13. First Month Weekly teleconferences.
Most of the Objectives were defined.
Some of the Activities were defined.
14. By December 2002 Draft Business Plan completed.
Objectives and activities were developed.
Many work plans, time lines, and additional teams were formed.
15. Keys to Success Commitment from all team members
Team composed of District and Central Office staff.
Business Plan is a living document and a working plan.
Linkage to other Plans
17. Business Plan Format Plans should:
Use a standard format.
Show application of the seven Business Model criteria.
Include linkages to higher level or related plans.
Be more detailed and specific at lower levels.
18. Proposed Deployment Schedule Complete Business Plans for:
Core Process Function
Tier 2 Function Plans by 07/01/04
Tier 3 Functional Unit Plans by 07/01/05
Support Function
Tier 2 Function Plans by 07/01/05
Tier 3 Functional Unit Plans by 07/01/06
19. Deployment Support Issues Training Materials
Technical assistance to Functional Teams
Central location to submit plans
Office to review the plans.
The Business Model Team will be active in planning and carrying out implementation.
Principal staff support will be from the District and Central Performance Management Offices.
20. Future Developments
Business Plans should be posted and accessible on the FDOT Intranet.
Linkages between plans should be coded.
A standard numbering system for goals should be applied throughout the plans
The deployment structure lends itself to future improvements.
21. Business Model TeamRecommendation Deploy the Business Model by developing functionally based business plans on the proposed schedule.
Business plans should use the standard form emphasizing the Business Model criteria.
22. Business Model Deployment