1 / 8

The organization of supervision in the draft directive

The organization of supervision in the draft directive. Klaas Knot De Nederlandsche Bank Member CEIOPS Managing Board Brussels, 06/03/2008. CEIOPS draft advice on Group Supervision. Released for consultation 25 February 2008 Two main parts in the report: Group support regime:

Download Presentation

The organization of supervision in the draft directive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The organization of supervision in the draft directive Klaas Knot De Nederlandsche Bank Member CEIOPS Managing Board Brussels, 06/03/2008

  2. CEIOPS draft advice on Group Supervision • Released for consultation 25 February 2008 • Two main parts in the report: • Group support regime: • Legal Conditions • Internal Control and Risk Management • Public Disclosure • Coordination, cooperation and exchange of information

  3. Coordination arrangements • Art. 252 (former 261) defines the rights and duties of the group supervisor. This article is based on article 11 of the Financial Conglomerate Directive and already existing Level 3 measures for insurance groups. • Art. 238 (former 247) defines the rights of the group supervisor and the solo supervisor with regard to monitoring and enforcing the Solvency Capital Requirement under a group support regime. The article is new and introduces a difference between “monitoring” and “enforcing”: • The solo supervisor will continue to monitor the SCR, but the responsibility for enforcing the SCR lays with the group supervisor. • The solo supervisory will monitor and enforce the MCR.

  4. CEIOPS Advice on Measures to facilitate effective supervision of groups • CEIOPS has drafted 30 implementing measures • CEIOPS MM adopted the advice unanimously • The implementing measures formalize existing informal arrangements: • organization of Colleges of Supervisors (currently CoCo´s) • functioning of Colleges of Supervisors • division of responsibilities among supervisors • exchange of information between supervisors • Voluntary agreements now become law !

  5. Important L2 measures suggested by CEIOPS 1 152 The Group Supervisor will assess the ability of the group to raise additional capital, and where it may be able to source this, and the adequate capital distribution of capital within the group. The Group Supervisor will notify the other supervisors in the College of Supervisors of the results of this assessment. 153 The Group Supervisor, in consultation with the relevant competent supervisors, will assess the possibilities of transferring capital around the Group and will notify the other supervisory in the College of Supervisors of that assessment.

  6. Important L2 measures suggested by CEIOPS 2 161 A supervisor of a subsidiary in a Group shall notify the Group Supervisor of any request to the parent entity to provide additional Group support (where a breach of the SCR has taken place. The Group Supervisor shall notify all other supervisors in the College of Supervisors. 162 A list that specifies the information that will be exchanged among supervisors in the College of Supervisors ) (23) Coordination, cooperation and information exchange is covered in the implementing measures providing sufficient powers to the supervisor to monitor. What about enforcement?

  7. Powers of supervisors to perform role • The Framework Directive moves the responsibility to enforce the SCR from the local supervisor to the Group Supervisor. • The Framework Directive proposes that an authorizing supervisor would request additional capital from an entity that he has no legal control over. • Supervisors are concerned that this is currently incompatible with their legal responsibilities and accountability. • Policy holder protection ! • Protection of a policyholder a stand alone insurer: MCR/capital + SCR/capital • Protection of a policyholder of a subsidiary of a group under a group support regime: MCR/capital + SCR/declaration of group support

  8. Further steps • CEIOPS welcomes input and ideas from stakeholders • CEIOPS invites you to a Public Hearing on the draft advice on group supervision and proportionality April 2, 2008 in Frankfurt

More Related