450 likes | 482 Views
ITER CODAC. Wolf-Dieter Klotz ITER Organization, Cadarache, France. ITER at a glance CODAC overall architecture ITER procurement model Standardization for Instrumentation & Control (I&C). Toroidal Field Coil Nb 3 Sn, 18, wedged. Central Solenoid Nb 3 Sn, 6 modules. Poloidal Field Coil
E N D
ITER CODAC • Wolf-Dieter Klotz • ITER Organization, Cadarache, France
ITER at a glance • CODAC overall architecture • ITER procurement model • Standardization for Instrumentation & Control (I&C)
Toroidal Field Coil Nb3Sn, 18, wedged Central Solenoid Nb3Sn, 6 modules Poloidal Field Coil Nb-Ti, 6 Cryostat 24 m high x 28 m dia. Torus Cryopumps, 8 Port Plug heating/current drive, test blankets limiters/RH diagnostics Blanket 440 modules Vacuum Vessel 9 sectors Divertor 54 cassettes Major plasma radius 6.2 m Plasma Volume: 840 m3 Plasma Current: 15 MA Typical Density: 1020 m-3 Typical Temperature: 20 keV Fusion Power: 500 MW Machine mass: 23350 t (cryostat + VV + magnets) - shielding, divertor and manifolds: 7945 t + 1060 port plugs - magnet systems: 10150 t; cryostat: 820 t The Core of ITER 29m ~28m
Magnet power convertors buildings Cryoplant buildings Hot cell Tokamak building Tritium building Cooling towers The ITER Site • Area about 60 ha • Buildings up to 60m high and 200m long
Courtesy AIF • The building construction permit was granted in April, 2008. • Building construction will begin in 2009. • ITER Site Preparation
Seven Parties are involved in ITER Construction International Cooperation
A Systems suited only to Host Party industry- Buildings- Machine assembly- System installation- Piping, wiring, etc.- Assembly/installation labour Construction Sharing C “Contributions in Kind”Major systems provided directly by Parties Overall cost sharing: EU 5/11, Others 6 Parties 1/11 each Overall contingency up to 10% of total. Total amount: 3577 kIUA (5079 M€-2007) Overall costs shared according to agreed evaluation of A+B+C • B • Residue of systems,jointly funded,purchased by ITER Project Team
What makes ITER different? • Internationally exploited experiment • “In-kind” procurement from 7 Parties • Nuclear installation – new rules • Reliability/availability higher than any previous fusion project • Continuous operation rather than pulsed • Long timescale to construct, operate, maintain
Control, Data Access and Communication ITER seen by CODAC • ~150 ‘one off’ industrial plant systems • delivered ‘in-kind’ with corresponding package • including • science • diagnostics • plasma control • industrial control • interconnected by dedicated networks
3 Tier Segregation CODAC PBS 4.5 Interlocks PBS 4.6 Nucl.Safety PBS 4.8 Comm. over Networks
CODAC - 4.5 CIS - 4.6 CSS - 4.8 Remote Access Plant Operation Zone
INTERLOCK SAFETY CONTROL
CODAC, CIS, CSS PBS 4.5, 4.6, 4.7 PLANT SYSTEMS
CODAC required equipment • Control room equipment • Engineering and configuration workstations • Scientific tools • Remote control rooms management SW • Mass data storage • Configuration databases • Central supervision system • Central Alarm system • Central timing system • Plant interface systems • Fast control systems • Fast data acquisition systems • Plant monitoring systems • Slow control systems • Industrial automation and control • Process instrumentation • Various type of networks
Interlock & Safety required equipment • Highly reliable and available PLC systems (SIL3 and class 2) • Various type of transducers • Various type of networks: TCP/IP, Safety field buses, monitored hardwired links • Supervisory systems • Long term safe data storage • Safety operator’s desks
CODAC, Interlock & Safety required activities • I&C Support for plant systems • Eng. support for CODAC • Eng. support for Interlock&Safety • Technical specifications • Engineering Design • Detailed Design • Prof-of-concept with prototypes • Procurement of equipment • SW programming • HW assembly • HW and SW integration • Factory testing • Installation and Commissioning
Prototypes realization (x 10) Central Safety Systems realization (x 3) Central Safety Systems realization (x 3) Central Interlock Systems realization (x 3) Central Interlock Systems realization (x 3) Prototypes realization (x 10) Central Interlock Systems realization (x 3) Central Safety Systems realization (x 3) Central Interlock and Safety Systems Support CODAC Support I&C Support for Plant Systems CODAC sub-systems Development CODAC sub-systems Development I&C Plant Systems realization (~ x100) I&C Plant Systems Development CODAC sub-systems Development CODAC sub-systems realization (~x 10) I&C Plant Systems Development I&C Plant Systems Development 2014 2010 2018 2012 2015 2011 2013 2019 2016 2017 2009 Q1 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q2 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q3 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Assistance Contracts Start Integrated commissioning Start of Tokamak assembly First Plasma Procurement Contracts In fund, contracts placed by ITER IO In kind, contracts placed by ITER DAs Task agreements, most probably no contracts with with Industry ITER IO Contract Strategy
IN FUND - Procurement IN KIND - Procurement Fund versus In-Kind Procurement
Assume CODAC + Plant System I&C is 7% of total cost • low end of typical range • amounts to about ➟ 317M€ • CODAC (the supervisory part) + CIS + CSS is funded at ➟ 75M • needs to be verified if CSS can be included • A first (top-down) estimate of Plant System I&C inside procurement arrangements is therefore the remaining ➟ 242M€ • EU has ~32.9% of procurement, and probably a greater fraction (~42.2%) of Plant System I&C ➟ 102M€ • ~75% is dominated by engineering costs ➟ 76.8M€, rather than component costs ➟ 25.2M€ • Plant System I&C Costs
extracted form Integrated Project Schedule IPS version 16-May-2008 • Procurement Schedule • Peak in preparing Procurement Arrangements: now to 2010 • no new Procurement Arrangements after 2012
CODAC component Provided to supplier “Ambassador” Procurement agreement Factory-testing Site acceptance Commissioning CODAC component Provided to supplier “Ambassador” CODAC Boundary
Integrated Project Teams in the DAs • There is need for efficient communication between CODAC and the Domestic Agency. • A model is suggested based on expert centers in the DAs. • Experts from the different DAs could spend time in Cadarache to develop a full understanding of CODAC, while at the same time contributing to the development of CODAC itself. • When in their Participant Teams, their knowledge can be passed on to the domestic industries or research institutions which, in turn, enhance the contact with the end-suppliers.
Reliability, Availability and Serviceability (RAS) • Open Standards • Conservative Solutions • Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) • Minimize New Development • Very easy to use • Low Risk • Fast Delivery • Low Total cost per channel • Bottom Up and Top Down Engineering to PLC • Standards Requirements • Procurement cannot work without Standardization
Standards ToBeDefined’s Procurement cannot work without Standardization • Plant System Controllers • PLCs • PCs/PCI • Chassis based systems: Compact PCI, PXI, ATCA, AMC, μTCA • Open Software • Operating Systems (LINUX distribution) • SCADA frameworks: EPICS, TANGO • RT-OS • Development Methodologies/Frameworks • PLC programming • Application IDEs: Eclipse, Control Studio, ... • Network Standards based on Gbit Ethernet • Protocols over IP and TCP
Plant System Host - will be provided by CODAC • works as gateway between Plant System and CODAC • contains communication middleware • maps plant data and protocols to a universal CODAC format • miniCODAC - will be provided by CODAC • works as portable system for plant design and SAT (may be FAT as well) • contains SCADA tools to set up autonomous plant control systems • Plant Control Design Handbook - is provided by CODAC • is the reference for mandatory and recommended standards • Standards How To - 3 Sources • Procurement cannot work without Standardization