1 / 17

Historical Background of the ACS Approval Program

Learn about the historical background, purpose, tasks, and current goals of the ACS Committee on Professional Training (CPT). Discover the approval process, program criteria, and future revisions to ensure high standards in chemistry education.

collinsl
Download Presentation

Historical Background of the ACS Approval Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. American Chemical Society Historical Background of the ACS Approval Program Anne B. McCoy Department of Chemistry The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 BCCE Symposium on The Evolution of the ACS Approval Process: Moving beyond the 2008 Guidelines July 31, 2012

  2. What is CPT? Founded in 1936 Brief history of the origins: In 1935 – the ACS Council established a “Committee for Accrediting Educational Institutions” with Thomas Midgley, Jr. as the Chairman Mandate: “The responsibility for properly accrediting institutions is wholly within the province of the permanent committee and it is hereby granted authority commensurate with this responsibility.” American Chemical Society

  3. What is CPT? Brief history of the origins: CPT Became a standing committee of the ACS in 1936 Initial tasks included: Establish "minimum standards of eligibility", institutions to apply for approved status. Survey of current practices sent to 750 universities and colleges, 450 replies received and analyzed. Data included staff, training, teaching loads, research activity, educational practices, procedures, etc. Classified and tabulated to provide comprehensive picture about "professional training of chemists at the collegiate level". American Chemical Society

  4. What is CPT? Now… • Our goals: • Promoting and assisting in the development of high standards of excellence in all aspects of post-secondary education, and undertaking studies important to their maintenance. • Collecting and making available information concerning trends and developments in modern chemical education. • Cooperating with the American Chemical Society and other professional and educational groups having mutual interests and concerns. American Chemical Society

  5. The process: By 1940, there were 65 approved programs. Today there are 667! American Chemical Society

  6. Approved program by institution type: • research universities depend critically on the baccalaureate degree recipients of smaller programs to staff their graduate programs • some level of uniformity in programs and standards of excellence is beneficial to the profession

  7. Who is involved in CPT American Chemical Society

  8. What do we do? • Establish and administer the approval program • The ACS through CPT approves chemistry programs • Conduct surveys to understand current trends in areas related to the professional education of chemists • Other activities relating to the professional training of chemists • ACS Directory of Graduate Research • Coordinating efforts to establish workshops American Chemical Society

  9. The approval program • Conduct and enhance an approval procedure for bachelor’s degree programs in chemistry. • CPT approves degree programs according to the 2008 guidelines. Currently 667 programs are approved. • Individual departments then certify students who meet the approved program curricula.

  10. Committee on Professional Training Program Approval • Institutional Involvement • Faculty and Staff • Adjunct, temporary and part-time • Teaching contact hours • Support staff • Infrastructure • Instrumentation • Computational capability • Chemical information resources • Chemical safety resources • Curriculum • Undergraduate research • Development of student skills • Self-assessment • www.acs.org/cpt

  11. The Chemistry Profession is Changing The 2008 guidelines presented a large departure from earlier versions in recognition of the evolution of the profession.

  12. Coursework Required for Certification under 2008 guidelines

  13. Added emphasis on Student Skills:

  14. The process: One of the goals of the 2008 guidelines was to streamline the application process and feedback to departments following receipt of the periodic reports Currently schools begin the process with a preapplication which is acted upon within 2 months Next they fill out a self-study which is evaluated by the committee and discussed with representatives from the department A site visitor is selected by CPT and goes to the institution at the invitation of the President to obtain a local view of the department Decisions for approval are made based on all of the gathered information Once approved, departments submit short annual reports and longer reports every five years. The five year reports are brought to the full committee and provide the basis for continuing approval of a program American Chemical Society

  15. Looking forward • The committee typically revises the Guidelines every four to six years in order to keep up with evolving trends in chemistry education and changes in the educational needs of professional chemists • We have begun the process of revising the 2008 guidelines, with an anticipated publication date for the revised guidelines in spring 2014 • To initiate the process we solicited feedback through a Comment Column, published in C&E News in January 2012 • In June, we held a retreat during which we developed the goals for the revision • We will be continuing to solicit feedback through symposia (like today’s), open meetings. • Additional information will be published in the semi-annual CPT Newsletter. American Chemical Society

  16. Goals of the revision • To engage in a “self-evaluation” of how the 2008 guidelines are working given the size of the departure in requirements and practices compared to earlier editions of the Guidelines • To clarify issues that came up in the periodic reports • To look at how changes in technology affect the delivery of chemistry curricula and how these changes should be reflected in the Guidelines • To evaluate what a experiences chemistry major needs to have in preparation to join the workforce and evaluate how these should be reflected in the Guidelines An important part of this process is community input… American Chemical Society

  17. The remainder of today’s symposium The evolving landscape of chemistry education. Richard Schwenz (University of Northern Colorado) 9:55 Small Group Discussion (10:15-10:35) The role of undergraduate research in the certified chemistry major Thomas Wenzel (Bates College) 10:35am Break 10:55-11:10 The increasingly multidisciplinary nature of chemistry. Joseph Francisco (Purdue University) 11:10am Challenges in preparing professional chemists: Imparting and assessing student skills Joel Shulman (University of Cincinnati) 11:30am Small Group Discussion (11:50-12:10) Panel Discussion (12:10-12:30) American Chemical Society

More Related