1 / 24

Evaluation and validation

Evaluation and validation. LL4S – Task 6 Radka Kalcheva. An Overview. 58 cases have been reported. Evaluation criteria. Who is the activity being addressed? – seniors / staff User influence on activities + Feedbacks Experience working with Web 2.0 tools

colm
Download Presentation

Evaluation and validation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation and validation LL4S – Task 6 Radka Kalcheva

  2. An Overview • 58 cases have been reported

  3. Evaluation criteria • Who is the activity being addressed? – seniors / staff • User influence on activities + Feedbacks • Experience working with Web 2.0 tools • European dimension - work on a Partnership level • Transferability • ‘Quality’ of the evaluation form

  4. Task 1 –Methods of involvement seniors in learning processes • 23 cases

  5. Task 1 –Methods of involvement seniors in learning processes • Users’ influence on the activities • Only 1 case reports for a direct users impact • Feedbacks • 4 cases – report for analyzes of the feedbacks ( 17 % ) • 1 case – Devon Regional survey • ‘Expectations of many/all of the participants are exceeded ‘ • Web 2.0 tools • 7 cases – report for using Web 2.0 tools into the activities 30 % of Task 1 cases

  6. Task 1 –Methods of involvement seniors in learning processes • Partnership level - European dimension • Transferability • 7 cases – DK , IT, SE • 6 cases – BG, ES, UK

  7. Task 1 –Methods of involvement seniors in learning processes • Quality of the evaluation form

  8. Summary • Cases profile • About 50% reported of teaching IT tools including Web 2.0 - BG, DK , ES (1) • The rest cases are connected with social sharing • 75 % addressed seniors or seniors and young people and ONLY 1 addressed staff • Feedbacks are not a part of the evaluation process • Partnership is very well developed • Almost all evaluation forms are fully filled

  9. Task 2 – Methods of involvement seniors as volunteers for community work • 13 cases

  10. Task 2 – Methods of involvement seniors as volunteers for community work • Users’ influence on the activities • Feedbacks • 3 cases – report for analyzes of the feedbacks ( 23 % ) • ‘Expectations of many/all of the participants are exceeded ‘ • Web 2.0 tools • 3 cases – report for using Web 2.0 tools into the activities ES, UK, SE 23 % of Task 2 cases

  11. Task 2 – Methods of involvement seniors as volunteers for community work • Partnership level - European dimension • Transferability • 3 cases – DK , IT, UK

  12. Task 2 – Methods of involvement seniors as volunteers for community work • Quality of the evaluation form

  13. Summary • Cases profile • The main part of the reported cases are connected with social sharing • Only one country reported usage of Web 2.0 tools - ES • All of the cases addressed seniors and ONLY 1 staff • Feedbacks are not a part of the evaluation process • Partnership is very well developed • Almost all evaluation forms are fully filled

  14. Task 3 –Methods of how to migrate knowledge from seniors to younger • 12 cases

  15. Task 3 –Methods of how to migrate knowledge from seniors to younger • Users’ influence on the activities • Feedbacks • Web 2.0 tools • 1 case – report for using Web 2.0 tools into the activities

  16. Task 3 –Methods of how to migrate knowledge from seniors to younger • Partnership level - European dimension • Transferability • 2 cases – ES , IT

  17. Task 3 –Methods of how to migrate knowledge from seniors to younger • Quality of the evaluation form

  18. Summary • Cases profile • Only one case reported of teaching IT tools - ES • 75 % addressed seniors and young people 25% addressed seniors • Partnership is very well developed • Almost all evaluation forms are fully filled

  19. Task 4 – Methods of how to maintain and increase the competence • 10 cases *

  20. Task 4 – Methods of how to maintain and increase the competence • Users’ influence on the activities • Feedbacks • 2 cases • Web 2.0 tools • 1 case – report for using Web 2.0 tools into the activities • But 8 /10 are related with IT tools

  21. Task 4 – Methods of how to maintain and increase the competence • Partnership level - European dimension • Transferability • 2 cases – ES , IT

  22. Task 4 – Methods of how to maintain and increase the competence • Quality of the evaluation form

  23. Summary • Cases profile • Almost all of them reported of teaching IT tools • 90 % addressed seniors 10 % addressed staff (1 case DK) • Partnership

  24. Conclusions • Cases profile • 55 cases addressed seniors • 3 addresses staff = 5% • Feedbacks • 9 feedbacks + 1 survey = 15 % • Partnership • Local level – 31 cases • National level - 3

More Related