1 / 4

BASKET-PROVE

BASKET-PROVE. Objective: To compare clinical efficacy of first generation SES implantation , 1st generation BMS and 2nd generation everolimus eluting stents in patients with coronary lesions in large coronary arteries ( ≥ 3 mm ).

colt-nelson
Download Presentation

BASKET-PROVE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BASKET-PROVE Objective:To compare clinical efficacy of first generation SES implantation, 1st generation BMS and 2nd generation everolimuseluting stents in patients with coronary lesions in large coronary arteries (≥ 3 mm). Study: Multicenter, single blind randomized trial. Population: All comers (STEMI, NSTEMI, UA, stable angina) with de novo native coronary lesions ≥ 3 mm. No shock, no LM. Endpoint: Composite of cardiac death or MI at 24 months f-up.

  2. BASKET-PROVE Enrolled n=2314 SES (Cypher) n=775 Everolimuseluting Stents (Xience V) n=774 BMS (Vision) n=765

  3. BASKET-PROVE Event rate at 24 months % P=0.007 NS NS NS NS P=0.002

  4. BASKET-PROVE Conclusion: In patients requiring stenting of large coronary arteries no difference between the rate of death or MI were found between sirolimus eluting, everolimuseluting and bare metal stents. Drug eluting stent implantation resulted in a decreased TVR. Kaiser et al. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2310-2319

More Related