1 / 33

Production and Applications of Laser Pairs Edison Liang Rice University

Production and Applications of Laser Pairs Edison Liang Rice University Collaborators : H. Chen, S.Wilks, LLNL; J. Myatt, D. Meyerhofer, Rochester; T. Ditmire, UT Austin (TPW); Alexander Henderson, Pablos Yepes (Rice) Talk at the ACUIL Berkeley 2010 Work partially supported by DOE, LLNL, NSF.

conlan
Download Presentation

Production and Applications of Laser Pairs Edison Liang Rice University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Production and Applications of Laser Pairs Edison Liang Rice University Collaborators: H. Chen, S.Wilks, LLNL; J. Myatt, D. Meyerhofer, Rochester; T. Ditmire, UT Austin (TPW); Alexander Henderson, Pablos Yepes (Rice) Talk at the ACUIL Berkeley 2010 Work partially supported by DOE, LLNL, NSF

  2. Laser Pair Creation Scaling 2. Cooling of MeV pairs 3. Applications of dense pairs

  3. The 1987 Cyg X-1 gamma-ray flare spectra can be interpreted as emissions from a pair-dominated MeV plasma with n+ ~ 1017cm-3 Can laser pair plasma probe the pair-saturated temperature limit? logL(erg/s) BKZS Pair-dominated kT limit ≤10MeV T/mc2

  4. Current techniques of accumulating positrons from accelerators and isotopes and trapping them with EM traps produce high rep rate but low density and current (Surko and Greaves 2004): Maximum Beam Intensity < 1010 e+/s Maximum Density < 1014 e+/cm3 Ultra-intense lasers opens up alternative approach to produce high intensity, high density, but short pulse pairs with high efficiency Many applications require pair density ≥ 1018/cm3

  5. In reality, the max. achievable pair density is probably around 1019 - 10 20 cm -3

  6. I=1020Wcm-2 Bethe- Heitler e+e- e Trident Nakashima & Takabe 2002 Trident process dominates for thin targets. But Bethe-Heitler dominates for thick targets.

  7. Two-sided irradiation on thin target may create more pairs, via hotter electrons and multiple crossings 1021 1021 Ponderomotive forces can lead to a pair cascade by reaccelerating the primary pairs in the foil (Liang et al 1998, 2002)

  8. For 1-sided irradiation Titan shows that thick target is more favorable (Chen et al 2009) EGS4 simulations analytic slope gives T/2

  9. Emergent positrons are attenuated by cold absorption inside target due to ionization losses but also accelerated by sheath fields. incident hot electron spectrum T =17.4mc2= 8.7 MeV 0 mm f(g) 0.25mm 0.5mm sheath electric field modifies emergent e+ spectra 0.75mm 1mm cold attenuation cuts off low energy positrons g

  10. GEANT4 simulations suggest that e+ yield /incident hot electron peaks at around 3 mm and increases with hot electron temperature at least up to ~15 MeV

  11. However, emergent e+/e- ratio peaks at larger thickness. Pairs may dominate beyond ~ 8 mm

  12. Adding extra Compton electrons give good match to Titan data . . . . . .

  13. Omega-EP

  14. Assuming that the conversion of laser energy to hot electrons ~20-30 %, and the hot electron temperature is ~ 10 MeV, Titan results suggest that the maximum positron yield may reach ~ 1012 e+ per kJ of laser energy if we can optimize the target and laser parameters The in-situ e+ density could reach > 1017/cm3 The peak e+ current could reach 1024 /sec

  15. How to rapidly convert MeV positrons to slow positrons? Key advantages of laser produced positrons are short pulse (~ps), high density (>1017/cc) and high yield efficiency (~10-3). To convert these ≥ MeV positrons to slow positrons using conventional techniques, such as moderation with solid noble gas, loses the above inherent advantages. We are exploring intense laser cooling, using photons as “optical molasses” similar to atomic laser cooling, to rapidly slow/cool MeV pairs down to keV or eV energies. g g2no e+/e- no

  16. In a strong B field, resonant scattering cross-section can become much larger than Thomson cross-section, allowing for efficient laser cooling: analogy to atomic laser cooling f>103sT • To Compton cool an unmagnetized MeV electron, needs laser fluence F ~mc2/sT = 1011J.cm-2=10MJ for ____~ 100mm spot size.______ But resonant scattering cross section peaks at fsT, f>103, F is reduced to 10MJ/f < kJ. However, as in atomic laser cooling, we need to “tune” the laser frequency higher as the electron cools to stay in ________resonance. How?_________ . For B=108G, hwcyc=1eV • res=1mm sT

  17. Idea: we can tune the effective laser frequency as seen by the e+/e- by changing the laser incident angle to match the resonant frequency as the positron slows. to t1 t2 g e+ t3 B lcyc = llaserg(1-vcosq)

  18. Idea: change the incident angle by using a mirror and multiple beams phased in time to t1 t2 g e+ t3 B lcyc = llaserg(1-vcosq) We are developing a Monte Carlo code to model this in full 3-D. Initial results seem promising (Liang et al 2010 in preparation)

  19. relativistic e+e- plasmas are ubiquitous in the universe NonthermalTeV pairs Thermal MeV pairs Laser-produced pair plasmas can be used to study astrophysics

  20. Phase space of intense laser plasmas overlap some relevant high energy astrophysics regimes PulsarWind GRB 4 3 2 1 0 Blazar log<g> 2x1022Wcm-2 ARC LASER PLASMAS 2x1020 solid density Microquasars Stellar Black Holes coronal density 2x1018 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 magnetization=We/wpe

  21. Pair annihilation-like features had been reported for several black hole candidates, but only CygX-1 has been confirmed CygX1 511

  22. 2D model of an e+e- pair-cloud surrounded by a thin accretion disk to explain the MeV-bump n+~1017/cc

  23. The Black Hole gamma-ray-bump can be interpreted as emissions from a pair-dominated MeV plasma with n+ ~ 1017cm-3 logL(erg/s) BKZS Pair-dominated kT limit T/mc2 Can laser-produced pair plasmas probe the pair-dominated temperature limit?

  24. Double-sided irradiation plus sheath focusing may provide astrophysically relevant pair “fireball” and/or collisionless shock in the center of a thick target cavity: ideal lab for GRB & BH flares diagnostics high density “pure” e+e- due to coulomb repulsion of extra e-’s PW laser PW laser 3-5mm 3-5mm diagnostics

  25. High density slow e+ source makes it conceivable to create a BEC of Ps at cryogenic temperatures (from Liang and Dermer 1988).

  26. Ground state of ortho-Ps has long live, but it can be spin-flipped into para-Ps using 204 GHz microwaves. Since para-Ps annihilates into 2-’s, there is no recoil shift. The 511 keV line has only natural broadening if the Ps is in the condensed phase.

  27. A Ps column density of 1021 cm-2 could in principle achieve a gain-length of 10 for gamma-ray amplification via stimulated annihilation radiation (GRASAR). (from Liang and Dermer 1988). Such a column would require ~1013 Ps for a cross-section of (1 micron)2. 1014 e+ is achievable with 10kJ ARC beams of NIF. Ps annihilation cross-section with only natural broadening

  28. Porous silica matrix at 10oK sweep with 204 GHz microwave pulse 1021cm-2 Ps column density 10 ps pulse of 1014 e+ 1 micron diameter cavity Artist conception of a GRASAR (gL=10) experimental set-up

  29. Summary 1. Maximum emergent e+ yield and e+/e- ratio may be reached at ~3 - 8 mm Au and kThot ~ 10-20 MeV. With ARC, the max. in-situ e+ density may exceed 1018 cm-3 and total e+ may exceed 1013. Lasers may be used to rapidly cool MeV pairs to make slow e+ via resonant scattering in strong B. 4. Density pair plasmas, coupled with > 106 G magnetic fields, can simulate many astrophysics phenomena, from black hole gamma-ray flares to gamma-ray bursts. Such pair plasma may be created at a central cavity inside a thick Au target.

  30. GEANT4 simulations give good qualitative agreement with Titan spectra

  31. Bethe-Heitler pair production yield is strongly dependent on target thickness: transition from quadratic to linear occurs around 2-3 mm. e+inside/e-hot incident bremss-g opt.thick bremss-g opt. thin thickness (mm)

  32. Positron production spectrum can be estimated by convolving bremsstrahlung gamma-ray spectrum with Bethe-Heitler cross-section /mc2 Hot electron ~T/2 ~T =g+

More Related