1 / 14

Carbon dioxide from TES

Carbon dioxide from TES. Susan Kulawik F. W. Irion Dylan Jones Ray Nassar Kevin Bowman Thanks to Chip Miller, Mark Shephard, Vivienne Payne. Challenges. More accuracy is required than for any other TES species Year over year increase in CO 2 ~2 ppm (0.5%)

coomes
Download Presentation

Carbon dioxide from TES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Carbon dioxide from TES Susan Kulawik F. W. Irion Dylan Jones Ray Nassar Kevin Bowman Thanks to Chip Miller, Mark Shephard, Vivienne Payne S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  2. Challenges • More accuracy is required than for any other TES species • Year over year increase in CO2 ~2 ppm (0.5%) • Seasonal variability ~5-15 ppm in the Northern Hemisphere (1-3%) • Plumes at ground stations are ~20 ppm (4%) • TATM and CO2 information is entangled • A +1K temperature error propagates into about +25 ppm CO2 error • CO2 retrieved by itself in the TES 2B1 filter has 2 DOF. When co-retrieved with TATM, the CO2 DOF drops to 0.6. • GMAO TATM is not adequate for TES CO2 retrievals • TATM errors propagate into CO2 unless TATM is retrieved S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  3. Strategy • Retrieve using 670-725, 970-990, 1070-1120 cm-1 spectral regions • Remove spectral areas showing poor fit, spikes, or spectroscopic issues • Co-retrieve TATM, H2O, CO2, cloud parameters, and surface temperature • Use a loose CO2 constraint, expecting averaging data AIRS selected windows S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  4. Measurements • TES measurement box • 13-35N x 128-158E • 2006 - 2008 • Peak information at 511 hPa • Ocean, low cloud OD • CONTRAIL aircraft • 9-11 km, Northern & Southern hemisphere. • Through 2006 • Mauna Loa • 19.5N, 155.6E, 3.4km • Through 2009 • American Samoa • 54.5S, 159E, surface site • Through 2008 Mauna Loa TES CONTRAIL American Samoa TES Macquarie Island S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  5. Uniform CO2 prior TES Northern Hemisphere results Mauna Loa CONTRAIL aircraft data TES monthly ave • Individual targets • Predicted error 7.9 ppm • Standard deviation 8.1 ppm • Monthly averages of ~200 targets • Approx 1 ppm errors compared to validation data • 5.6 ppm low bias, constant value • Highly correlated with Mauna Loa observatory • 1.5 +- 0.5 ppm yearly increase – Mauna Loa 1.8 +- 0.2 ppm S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  6. Uniform CO2 prior Southern hemisphere results • Monthly averages of ~130 targets • Approx 2 ppm errors compared to validation data • 5 ppm low bias compared to American Samoa ground station • 1.7 +- 0.3 ppm yearly increase -- Samoa 1.9 +- 0.1 ppm Samoa ground station CONTRAIL aircraft data TES monthly ave S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  7. Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) - Ray Nassar TES • 20 x 30 degree x 1 month averages • 0.3 – 1.1 DO0.5 – 2.0 ppm errors GLOBALVIEW • 76 surface stations MODEL • GEOS-Chem with NASA GMAO met . fields, specialized CO2 source/sink inputs FLUXES • 14 regions of combustion and terrestrial exchange + “rest of world” (29 elements) • A priori flux uncertainty: • 100% for terrestrial biosphere • 30% for combustion S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  8. OSSE - Ray Nassar -cont A posteriori flux uncertainties: • TES: improves flux uncertainty from 100% to 15-28% for biosphere fluxes • 76 surface stations: comparable to TES if 0.1 ppm errors assumed; worse performance if 1 ppm errors assumed TES and surface station sensitivities are complementary and future work will explore combinations of TES, surface stations, OCO, and GOSAT S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  9. Spectral view • Signal apparent in residual • Working with AER (Vivienne Payne, Mark Shephard) to resolve and test spectroscopy improvements • Also Javier Martin-Torres is going to compare radiances with FUTBOLIN forward model S. Kulawik – January, 2009

  10. Conclusions • TES observes CO2 • Correct seasonal cycles and patterns for NH and SH ocean • Yearly increase seen • OSSE shows TES data will improve flux estimates • Future plans • Validation– land, bias characterization, global comparisons to AIRS, Carbontracker, spectroscopy updates • Generate 3 months of TES CO2 for assimilation and flux estimates Work at JPL was carried out under contract to NASA with funds from ROSES 2007. Work by Nassar et al. funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. We acknowledge use of GLOBALVIEW-CO2, Mauna Loa, and Samoa data from NOAA-ESRL and CONTRAIL data from World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (WDCGG). S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  11. References • Matsueda, H., H. Y. Inoue, and M. Ishii (2002), Aircraft observation of carbon dioxide at 8‑13 km altitude over the western Pacific from 1993 to 1999. Tellus, 54B(1), 1‑ 21, doi: 10.1034/j. 1600‑0889.2002.00304.x • U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory | Global Monitoring Division http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/site/SMO.html S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  12. Future plans • Validation • Global characterization of bias • Land targets (comparing to airplane flights, e.g. SGP) • Effects of strategy on TATM, other species • Comparisons to AIRS and CarbonTracker • Science • 3 months of TES CO2 output for assimilation and inversion by Dylan Jones’ group to estimate fluxes • CO2 data in Atlantic/Pacific near US for REAM model comparisons (Y.Choi) • CO2/CO ratios for elevated CO regions Work at JPL was carried out under contract to NASA with funds from ROSES 2007. Work by Nassar et al. funded by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. We acknowledge use of GLOBALVIEW-CO2, Mauna Loa, and Samoa data from NOAA-ESRL and CONTRAIL data from World Data Centre for Greenhouse Gases (WDCGG). S. Kulawik – February, 2009

  13. TATM Effects • Retrieve CO2 with TATM fixed at GMAO and selected windows • Signal too large • Peak too late • Co-retrieved TES TATM vs GMAO shows seasonal fluctuations S. Kulawik – January, 2009

  14. Spectral view (cont) • Idea from Mark Shephard • Compare radiance change from dCO2 and dTATM • Select radiances most influenced by dCO2 (red) • Would mean a sequential retrieval S. Kulawik – January, 2009

More Related