1 / 41

DESIGN OF MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT ANTENNA ARRAYS

DESIGN OF MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT ANTENNA ARRAYS. JOHDPUR  FEB. 28-29,2008 AND BANGALORE  MAR. 3-4, 2008 Dr. Eric K. Walton The Ohio State University ElectroScience Lab. Walton.1@osu.edu 614 292 5051. BASIC CONCEPT OF THE FSS ARRAY ANTENNA CLUSTER. BEAM 1. BEAM 2. BEAM 3.

corin
Download Presentation

DESIGN OF MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT ANTENNA ARRAYS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DESIGN OF MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT ANTENNA ARRAYS JOHDPUR  FEB. 28-29,2008 AND BANGALORE  MAR. 3-4, 2008 Dr. Eric K. Walton The Ohio State University ElectroScience Lab. Walton.1@osu.edu 614 292 5051

  2. BASIC CONCEPT OF THE FSS ARRAY ANTENNA CLUSTER BEAM 1 BEAM 2 BEAM 3 ARRAY 2 ARRAY 1 RADOME ARRAY 3 MECHANICALLY STEERED BEAMS MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT ANTENNA ARRAYS MOUNTED INSIDE A RADOME

  3. BASIC ARRAY CONCEPT EACH TRANSPARENT ANTENNA PANEL: STYROFOAM DIELECTRIC RADIATING ELEMENTS PRINTED ON MYLAR FSS TRANSMISSION LINES PRINTED ON DUROID FSS GROUND PLANE PRINTED ON MYLAR EACH OUTER ARRAY ANTENNA IS TRANSPARENT TO THE INNER ARRAYS

  4. MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT FSS ARRAY ANTENNAS TRANSMISSION LINE DESIGN AND TESTING

  5. Center part of layout; view from top This layout is only so that the basic repeating pattern can be understood. Red = transmission lines Yellow = slots in foam Orange = holes in foam/Mylar Green = FSS pattern on Mylar (ant. Elements not shown)

  6. RF Transparent Array Antenna for Dense Array Cluster Branch lines Main trunk line Proportional power directional couplers Rotatable feed stubs The transmission line array was perhaps the most complex part of the entire system. (See presentation by Eugene Lee)

  7. Radiating CP dipoles FSS Ground Plane Transmission Line TRANSMISSION LINE LOCATION GAP “D”

  8. THE TRANSMISSION LINE FEED SYSTEM

  9. TRANSMISSION LINE FEED SYSTEMSingle branch tap

  10. S band transmission line distribution at 2230 MHz

  11. MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT FSS ARRAY ANTENNAS RADIATING ELEMENT DESIGN AND TESTING

  12. A DUAL RHOMBIC LOOP ANTENNA FOR CIRCULAR POLARISATION H. Morishita , T. Iizuka, K. Hirasawa and T.Nagao • Length of side = 0.354λ = 62.58 mm • Size of break = 0.016λ = 2.82 mm • Size of connector = 8 mm • Resonant Frequency = 1697MHz • Input Impedance = 61.914 + j 0.080773 Ω • Max gain = 3.888 dBi Antennas and Propagation, 4-7 April 1995 Conference Publication No. 407,O IEE 1995.

  13. Comparison of Element Designs Cut Corners Concave Corners • Element Radius = 0.45λ (0.079m) • Single Loop Circumference = 1.33λ (0.236m) • Zin @ 1697 MHz = 90.691 – j 2.039 Ω • Element Radius = 0.45λ (0.079m) • Single Loop Circumference = 1.40λ (0.248m) • Zin @ 1697 MHz = 90.959 – j 2.387 Square Corners (original element) • Element Radius = 0.52λ (0.092m) • Single Loop Circumference = 1.40λ (0.248m) • Zin @ 1697 MHz = 61.268 – j 8.959 Ω

  14. S-band Arrays • Single element side length and break position was optimized for peak gain at resonance (see appended slides) • 14x14 array simulated over ‘+x+x+’ FSS ground planes of different sizes (results on following three slides) s Figure 1: Sample S-band Element (side length, s = 0.34λ2230MHz; break position = 2/3) Figure 2: Sample FSS Configuration

  15. RF Transparent Array Antenna for Dense Array Cluster Flat loop antenna

  16. RF Transparent Array Antenna for Dense Array Cluster TESTING THE FLAT LOOP ANTENNA Abused (cold) grad students: Eugene Lee (PHD) And Ryan Pavlovicz (Senior – soon to be grad student)

  17. MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT FSS ARRAY ANTENNAS FSS GROUND PLANE DESIGN AND TESTING

  18. FSS GROUND PLANE PRINTED ON MYLAR RADIATING ELEMENTS AND FSS GROUND PLANE ARE MADE OF COPPER OR SILVER PRINTED ON MYLAR DIELECTRIC SUBSTRATE IS SIMPLY A PANEL OF STYROFOAM (THE MYLAR LAYERS GIVE IT STRENGTH AND RIGIDITY) THE TRANSMISSION LINE STRUCTURE IS TWIN LINES PRINTED ON STABLE DIELECTRIC

  19. FSS

  20. Array with FSS

  21. MUTUALLY TRANSPARENT FSS ARRAY ANTENNAS FULL SYSTEM DESIGN AND TESTING

  22. FULL SYSTEM MODELING RADIATING ELEMENTS; FSS LAYER; TRANSMISSION LINE SYSTEM EXAMPLE; WIRE GRID MODEL OF L-BAND ARRAY BLOCKING S-BAND ARRAY

  23. MODELING RESULTS S-band Octagonal Array • 156 Elements • Input impedance ~ 103.7 + j17.6Ω • Boresite gain = 31.9 dBiC • 162 x 152 FSS ground plane

  24. S-Band Boresight gain vs. frequency for individual quadrants

  25. CR BLOCKAGEExperimental Setup Walton (not to scale) ANTENNA ARRAY PANELS (SET UP FOR TRANSMISSIVITY TESTING) Range center line Eugene’s Slide ~(12’ x 6’ x 5”) 84” ROTATE Support Legs SLIDE Foam Support columns

  26. COMPACT RANGE BLOCKAGE TESTING ARRAYS HANDSOME GRAD STUDENT FOAM SUPPORTS

  27. ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTAL TESTING S band array at boresight vs. L band array blockage Percent blockage results GAIN (DBIC) VS. FREQ. (MHZ)

  28. S band array patterns @ 2170 MHzfor different blockage % GAIN (DBIC) -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 S band blocked by L-band array NONE; 0%; 25%; 50%; 75%; 100% -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 AZIMUTH (DEG)

  29. S band array patterns @ 2170 MHzfor different occlusion % [zoom] ZOOM GAIN (DBIC) -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 S band blocked by L-band array NONE; 0%; 25%; 50%; 75%; 100% -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 AZIMUTH (DEG)

  30. S band array patterns @ 2170 MHzfor different occlusion% [zoom 2x] ZOOM No blockage 50% blockage 100 % blockage GAIN (DBIC) 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 S band blocked by L-band array NONE; 0%; 25%; 50%; 75%; 100% S band blocked by L-band array NO; EDGE; 25%; 50%; 75%; 100% -5 -4 -3 -3 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 AZIMUTH (DEG)

  31. Full Array gain max

  32. PROTOTYPE READY FOR TESTING PROTOTYPE INTEGRATION: SUPPORT MECHANISM POSITIONING MECHANISM EM TRANSPARENT ARMS PATENTED APRIL 13, 2007 BEAMS ARE STEERED USING ONLY LOW-POWER SERVOMECHANISMS

  33. PROTOTYPE TESTINGIN OSU/ESL COMPACT RANGE 1. Handsome Grad Student 2. Old professor 3. Smart engineer

  34. Calibrated S band Boresight GainMeasurements in outdoor area ~17.3 dBiL

  35. Calibrated S band Boresight Gain Measurements in OSU compact range

  36. Compact Range - Boresight @ 2170 MHz (270/0 cut)

  37. Boresight @ 2230 MHz (270 cut) Discuss only if questions

  38. As expected Full Array gain study Too low In tracking down where the 10 dB went, we discovered that the silver printed on Mylar had slowly oxidized. Both the FSS ground plane elements and the radiating elements were now resistive. (20 to 50 ohms end-to-end!)

  39. SUMMARY OF RESEARCH SO FAR • WE BUILT AND TESTED A 3-ANTENNA SYSTEM • PARTNERS: (SBIR PHASE 1 AND 2) (PHASE 3 HOPEFUL) • SPAWAR SAN DIEGO • THE OSU ELECTROSCIENCE LAB. (ERIC WALTON) • SYNTONICS LLC (BRUCE MONTGOMERY) • PROBLEMS OVERCOME: (DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION , TESTING) • EM TRANSPARENT RADIATING ELEMENTS • EM TRANSPARENT FSS GROUND PLANE • EM TRANSPARENT DIELECTRIC SUPPORT PANEL • EM TRANSPARENT TRANSMISSION LINE FEED SYSTEM • EM TRANSPARENT SUPPORT ARMS • EM TRANSPARENT PANEL SUPPORT STEERING MECHANISM/CONTROL • TEST AND EVALUATION PROCESS AND IT WORKED VERY WELL (GAIN; SIDELOBES; POLARIZATION; MUTUAL INDEPENDENCE)

  40. FUTURE RESEARCH EXPECTED: • (6.1 research program) • GENERALIZE THE DESIGN OF FSS TRANSMISSION LINE FEED NETWORKS (this is a PHD problem & is now in progress (Eugene Lee) ) • GENERALIZE THE DESIGN OF THE MULTIPLE ARRAY SYSTEM (other groups will need to do their own specialized designs) • (6.2 research program) • OPTIMIZE THE DESIGN OF THE SYSTEM COMPONENTS (ELEMENTS, FSS, TRANSMISSION LINES) (better & lower cost components, interconnections and structural supports to be developed) • OPTIMIZE THE PRINTING OF COPPER OR SILVER LINES ON MYLAR (practical chemistry problems to be overcome) • OPTIMIZE THE INTEGRATION OF THE “STACK” (better materials, low dielectric adhesives, interconnections between printed conductive lines and the transmission line network, possible spherical segment shapes for arrays) • (6.3 research program) • BUILD AND TEST A FULLY OPERATIONAL PROTOTYPE SYSTEM (demonstrate tracking of multiple satellites; provide operational data) • DEVELOP LOW COST AND EFFECTIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES FOR HIGH VOLUME PRODUCTION (possibly in partnership with larger manufacturing corporation)

  41. QUESTIONS? Dr. Eric K. Walton The Ohio State Univ. ElectroScience Lab Columbus, OH; walton.1@osu.edu 614 292 5051 DR. ERIC WALTON OSU ELECTROSCIENCE Walton.1@osu.edu 614 292 5051

More Related