530 likes | 722 Views
Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”. Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”. Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”. Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”.
E N D
Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”
Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”
Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”
Emotional Development: What are “emotions?” – Not just “feelings”
Emergence of positive emotions: smiling • Action of smiling apparent from birth • Primarily during REM sleep • Meaning unknown • 1-month olds smile to strokes on the face • Smiling to “causal events” shown by 2-month olds (“pulling” a string to hear music)
Emergence of positive emotions: smiling • “Social smiles” apparent by 3-months • Smiles to interesting objects also at 3-months (but less than to people) • 4-month olds smile to familiar events • 7-month olds’ most dominant smiles are to familiar people • 1-year olds smile to “discrepant events” • 18-month olds laugh (hysterically) when they do something that makes others’ laugh
Emergence of negative emotions: distress, wariness & fear • Newborns’ cry to hunger, discomfort, pain • 2-month olds’ show facial expression of anger/sadness • 4-month olds’ “social distress” to a “still face” • 6-to-7-months wariness to strangers Go to Disc 2
Emergence of negative emotions: distress, wariness & fear • 8-to-12-months “separation [from mother] anxiety” • Begins to decline after 15-months • Found in numerous cultures: • US • Israeli Kibbutzim • !Kung desert cultures • Found in blind toddlers (absence of mothers voice)
Emergence of negative emotions: distress, wariness & fear • 1-year olds’ show anger (frustration) & sadness (prolonged separation from parents) • “Terrible twos” (3’s/4’s?!) – before 2-years; non- universal
Regulation of Emotions Emotional self-regulation – “the process of initiating, inhibiting, or modulating internal feeling-states, emotion-related physiological processes, and emotion-related cognitions or behaviors in the service of accomplishing ones goals”
Regulation of Emotions Emotional self-regulation – “the process of initiating, inhibiting, or modulating internal feeling-states, emotion-related physiological processes, and emotion-related cognitions or behaviors in the service of accomplishing ones goals”
Regulation of Emotions • Walter Mischel and the “marshmellow test” • Pre-schooler (4-years old) taken to a room where • they see favorite treats • Given 2 choices: • wait for a long time for 2 treats • ring bell to end the waiting for 1 treat
Regulation of Emotions • Correlates with the outcomes 10-years later & adulthood: • Social competence • Academic achievement • Verbal fluency • Rational thinking • Attentiveness • Planfulness • Ability to deal with frustration • Further ability to delay gratification • Performance on SAT’s • Self-esteem • Drug use
The emergence of emotional regulation: shift from caregiver to self-regulation (during the first 24-months) • Early infancy is all about caregiver • 6-month olds’ reduce distress by averting gaze or “self soothing” behavior (rocking, stroking) • By 1-year: increasing diversion of attention to non-distressing activities or people other than parents • Use of language: transition from tantrums to discussion & negotiation
The emergence of emotional regulation: shift from caregiver to self-regulation (during the first 24-months) • Response to parental expectations: complying with simple instructions (before 1-year of age) • Inhibition of movement & “self” problem-solving • Social Referencing: toddlers learn to use signals from their caregivers about what they can or cannot do • The emergence of “self-control” before the age of 2-years: • Example of 18-month Liam learning to keep his hands off of daddy’s stereo
The emergence of emotional regulation: shift from caregiver to self-regulation • The use of cognitive strategies (3-to-5-year olds) • Shift from self-distracting behavior to thinking • Ability to “see” (think about) positive outcomes • Making “emotional adjustments” to emotionally difficult situations (downplaying importance of peer teasing)
The emergence of emotional regulation: shift from caregiver to self-regulation • 5-years of age and older: The selection of appropriate (refined) regulatory strategies • More precise planning and problem-solving • Diversification of coping strategies • Differentiation between what can, and cannot, be controlled • Further adaptability to situations, rather than attempting to change (what is unchangeable)
The relation between emotional regulation & social competence “Social competence” – “the ability to achieve personal goals in social interactions while simultaneously maintaining positive relationships with others (Rubin, et al., 1998)”
Emotional development & parenting dimensions • Parent-strategy “goodness of fit” & temperament • “Security of attachment” (chapter 11) • Degree of positive v. negative emotions • Degree of social anxiety • Degree of understanding emotions
Emotional development & parenting dimensions • Parental expression (and modeling) of negative emotions • Angry parents result in angry children • No discussion of emotions results in children who think discussions of emotions is “bad”
Emotional development & parenting dimensions • Amy Halberstadt and modeling positive emotions in the house • Children express positive emotions more often • More socially skilled (i.e., with peers) • Understand the emotions of others’ • Low in aggression • Higher self-esteem
Emotional development & parenting dimensions • Parental reactions to children’s emotions: being dismissive of emotions • Children are less sympathetic to others • Less skill in coping with stress • More prone to negative emotions & aggression
Emotional development & parenting dimensions • Accepting & supportive parental responses to child’s emotions: acknowledging and validating emotions • Opposite of the above • More competent with peers • Children perform better academics
Parental discussion of emotions: engendering children’s understandings of emotional regulation • Family conversations are a key component of children’s emotional socialization • Parents who discuss emotions teach their meaning • Association between parent-child discussions of emotions and children’s ability to understand the emotions of others
Parental discussion of emotions: engendering children’s understandings of emotional regulation • Discussions in the “heat of the moment” • Supportive actions and comments help children’s understanding • Hostile actions and comments hinder understanding • Too much conversation (in the heat of the moment) doesn’t get heard
Parental discussion of emotions: engendering children’s understandings of emotional regulation • Discussions during “every day” situations help children’s understanding (called “incidental learning”) • Discussions when children are calm and engaged are more likely to be heard • Incidental discussions linked to real events taking place is the best time to talk and explain • Feelings are best understood when linked to real-time events (problems with sharing, teasing, play with peers, etc.)
Individual differences in emotions & regulation: Temperament LARGE individual differences in emotional expression & regulation (“mellow” v. “emotional”; Timid v. outgoing) “Temperament” – constitutionally [biologically] based individual differences in emotional, motor, and attentional reactivity and self-regulation that demonstrate consistency across situations, as well as relative stability over time (Rothbart & Bates, 1998).”
Individual differences in emotions & regulation: Temperament • Chess & Thomas (1977) temperament dimensions • First comprehensive longitudinal study of temperament • Defined several measures (i.e., “activity level”) • Found continuity from 2-months, 2-years & 10-years
Individual differences in emotions & regulation: Temperament Rothbart & Bates (1998) temperament dimensions: Fearful distress – distress and withdrawal in new situations and how long it takes a child to adjust Irritable distress – fussiness, anger, and frustration, especially if the child is not allowed to do what he or she wants Attention span and persistence – duration of orienting toward objects or events of interest Activity level – amount of movement (e.g., kicking, crawling) Positive affect – smiling and laughter, approach to people, degree of cooperativeness and manageability Rhythmicity – the regularity and predictability of the child’s bodily functions such as eating and sleeping
Individual differences in emotions & regulation: Temperament Thomas, Chess & Birch (1968) temperament dimensions: Intensity of reaction – The energy level or reaction of the child’s response Threshold of responsiveness – The intensity of stimulation needed to elicit a response
Individual differences in emotions & regulation: Temperament • Stability of Temperament over time • Walter Mischel and the “marshmellow test” • Chess & Thomas dimensions correlate from 2-month to 10-years • Various other researchers • Negative emotions from 3-years to 8-years • Level of attention from preschool to 12-years • Fetal movement at 20-weeks to 6-months of age
The physiology of temperament: Jerome Kagan and “behavioral inhibition”
The physiology of temperament: Jerome Kagan and “behavioral inhibition”
The physiology of temperament: Jerome Kagan and “behaviorally uninhibited”
The physiology of temperament: Jerome Kagan and “behaviorally uninhibited”
The physiology of temperament: Jerome Kagan and “behavioral inhibition” • 2-years and 4 ½-years • Response to novelty (objects & situations) • Compared most “inhibited” (shy) to most “uninhibited” • Behavioral measures (Rothbart scale) correlated • Heart rate variability correlates • Cortisol levels (hormones in saliva) correlated
The physiology of temperament: Nathan Fox and EEG correlates • Increased activity in the right frontal lobe correlated with: • Withdrawal • Negative affect • Fear • Anxiety
The physiology of temperament: Nathan Fox and EEG correlates • Increased activity in the left frontal lobe correlates with: • Approach behavior • Positive affect • Exploration • Sociability
Emergence of “self-conscious” emotions • Involves “self-awareness” (demonstrated after 12-months) and awareness of others’ reactions to us • Embarrassment, pride, guilt, shame • Michael Lewis (1998) emergence only after 2nd birthday • Some examples of pride & embarrassment at 15-months • Some evidence of guilt & shame after 2nd birthday
Emergence of “self-conscious” emotions • Broken doll experiment • Some toddlers showed “shame” behavior – hiding doll, avoiding adult • Some toddlers showed “guilt” behavior – attempt to repair doll, told/showed experimenter broken doll, little avoidance of adult • By 3-years pride tied to achievement/performance (i.e., more demonstration of pride to difficult tasks than to easy tasks) • The elicitation & expressions of these emotions are non- universal
Parental correlates to “guilt” v. “shame” • Emphasis on “badness” of behavior v. child • Degree to which parents attempt to help child’s understanding • Emphasis on the need to repair the harm/damage • Degree of public v. private feedback • public humiliation very shameful • Extent of humor, respect & love in the process • Degree of adult approval (as is the case with pride & embarrassment)