80 likes | 219 Views
EMPIRE 2009 EXERCISE. Status Report – October, 2008. Michael F. DeBonis Environmental Engineer USEPA Region 02 Radiation and Indoor Air Branch. Overview --- what’s involved? Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center (FRMAC) Federal goals/objectives EPA goals/objectives
E N D
EMPIRE2009 EXERCISE Status Report – October, 2008 Michael F. DeBonis Environmental Engineer USEPA Region 02 Radiation and Indoor Air Branch
Overview --- what’s involved? • Federal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center (FRMAC) • Federal goals/objectives • EPA goals/objectives • EPA personnel • Elements & proposed schedule
Overview – What’s involved? • Radioactive Dispersal Device (RDD) detonated in Albany, NY area • Federal, State and local response beginning at +48 hours (table-top exercise for 0 to 48 hours) • Plume spread: Locally, to adjacent “areas” • Potential protective actions: • Evacuation/Sheltering • Relocation • Agricultural restrictions • Access restrictions
FRMACFederal Radiological Monitoring and Assessment Center A federal asset available on request by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to respond to nuclear/radiological incidents as described in the National Response Plan Provides: • Verified radiation measurements • Interpretations of radiation distributions based on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), or local Protective Action Guidelines • Characterization of overall radiological conditions • Phased Response: Consequence Management Response Teams (CMRT I, II, III)
Federal goals/objectives • Evaluate incident management capabilities of federal, state, and local response resources • Assess communication, resource, and response coordination within a unified response • Assess FRMAC integration with established state and local response structure • Ensure that crime scene management and criminal intelligence gathering are taken into account • Develop implementation strategies and dissemination procedures for Protective Action Decisions (Protective Action Guides) • Demonstrate mass notification procedures
EPA goals/objectives • Evaluate the ability to integrate EPA’s assessment capabilities with those of other agencies • Demonstrate EPA’s ability to work within ICS in response to a major radiological incident • Exercise EPA’s role in ESF 15 (external affairs) at national and site-specific levels
EPA Planning Personnel Eric Daly (ERRD/NJ) -Trusted Agent/Point of Contact for USEPA (Potential Evaluator/Controller for Exercise) James Daloia (ERRD/NJ) -Trusted Agent Ray Clark (ORIA/DC)- Trusted Agent (Potential Evaluator/Controller for Exercise) Gary Spradlin (RERT/LV)- Trusted Agent (Potential Evaluator/Controller for Exercise) Joshua Pate (RERT/AL)- Trusted Agent (Potential Evaluator/Controller for Exercise) Mike DeBonis (RIAB/NY)-Trusted Agent
Elements & proposed schedule 1. Initial Planning Conference: April 30-May 1, 2008 2. DC Interagency Meeting: June 10-14 2008 (Executive Managers) 3. Midterm Planning Conference: Sept 24-25, 2008 4. MSEL Conference: Feb 25-26, 2009 5. Final Planning Conference: April 15-16, 2009 6. Facilitated Discussion first 48 hrs: week of May 11th 2009 7. Full Scale Exercise: June 1-5, 2009 8. After Action Evaluation Meeting: Aug 19-20, 2009 9. After Action Conference: October 21-22, 2009