1 / 26

Heavy Quark Phenomenology

Heavy Quark Phenomenology. B → f K S CP / f K * Polarization /Collider Implications. August 17, 2003 ICHEP2004, Beijing. Outline. Comment on BNV in t Decay Intro: HQ & NP b  s Phenomena is Current Frontier for NP Light and f K S CPV : PRL Highlights

corine
Download Presentation

Heavy Quark Phenomenology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Heavy Quark Phenomenology B→fKSCP/fK*Polarization/Collider Implications August 17, 2003 ICHEP2004, Beijing

  2. Outline • Comment on BNV in t Decay • Intro: HQ & NP b s Phenomena is Current Frontier for NP • LightandfKSCPV:PRL Highlights Model Upshot / PV,PP Numerics / KSp0gCPV / BS • fK*Polarization:Heuristic/Drastic Model SM; NP — CPV, TV • Collider Search for Light : Tevatron! • Conclusion Based on WSH, M. Nagashima, A. Soddu, hep-ph/0404002 C.K. Chua, WSH, M. Nagashima, PRL92, 201803 (2004) WSH and M. Nagashima, hep-ph/0408007 K. Cheung and WSH, hep-ph/0404041 (to appear PRD) George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  3. Comment on B#V in t Decay Contrary to our hep-ph Marciano, Nucl.Phys.Proc.Suppl. ’95 ARGUS 1992 CLEO 1999 ? 2004? Likewise for t+ Lp+ George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  4. I. Introduction: HQ & NP b  s Phenomena is Current Frontier for NP • CP Phase sin2FBd~ 0.73 Agree with CKM Fit • butB Kp/pp Modes ? • Issin2FBdfKs Opposite Sign to sin2FBd !? • Other bs Penguins ?fK*Polarization ? • EWP: Could NP emerge in bsℓ+ℓ− ? • DmBs“Just Around the Corner” • but ifsin2FBs ≠ 0 NP • bsgL? Wrong Helicity Component? • Test via B0KSp0gMixing-dep CPV (KS tagging) • ≠ 0NP • or Bsfg[or L Polarization] George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  5. NP CPV phase s~ 60° - 70° ~ 200 GeV Collider Direct Search (IV) ~ 500 GeV II. Light and fKSCPV PRL Highlights Model Upshot Two Particle System Flavor Factory but need to disentangle hadronic effect Clean Modes George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  6. Large Eff. s-b Mixing IfSfKs< 0 [Belle/BaBar Update ...] Large,NewPhysics,b → s CPVEffect • Large Effective s-b Mixing • NewCPV Phase • Right-handed Interaction [to getsin2f1eff (KSp0) ~ sin2f1] Independently Motivated Model: a Light Strange-beauty Squark 1 NewCPV Phase George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  7. Mass/Mixing Hierarchy & R.H. FlavorSector mass VCKM no r.h. force Ansatz Commuting Charges Motivation: Abelian Flavor Symmetry • Nir-Seiberg, PLB’93; Leurer-Nir-Seiberg, NPB’94 George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  8. Alternative Picture: Chang, Masiero, Murayama Mass/Mixing Hierarchy & R.H. FlavorSector no r.h. force Ansatz Commuting Charges Motivation: Abelian Flavor Symmetry Prominent r.-h. elements • Nir-Seiberg, PLB’93; Leurer-Nir-Seiberg, NPB’94 • Chua-WSH, PRL’01: Because of FCNC, Need 4 Texture Zeros(decouple s flavor) • Arhrib-Chua-WSH ’01:Decouple d flavor Focus: s-b GUT George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  9. Level Splitting by Large Mixing Drive One State Light strange-beauty squark 1 CP Phase s Focus on 200 GeV George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  10. A Little Note on Formalism … • Besides O1,2Tree • O3-6Strong Penguin • O7-10EM/EW Penguin • alsoO11,12g/g Dipole Matrix Elements evaluated via Naïve Factorization George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  11. 1, 0.5 TeV 2, 0.5 1, 0.8 TeV 2, 0.8 b sg(andB fKs) Rate Constraint • Survive b sg Constraint !! • B fKsRate [ More Conservative ] s ~ p: LR Chiral Enhancement • fKs Rate “Sees Red” • Combine b s g and B fKs • → s ~ p/2,3p/2 ? Arhrib-Chua-WSH, PRD’01 George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  12. SfKs < 0,SKsp0~ SyKsPossible : Anticorrelated • SfKs< 0 prefers lower s-plane • SKsp0,Sh’Ks~sin2FBd as well! • Lower gluino masslowers SfKs • Prefer to keep gluino mass • above 500 GeV (L.E. Constraints) • >>Hadronic Parameters << • CP phase enters B → fKs via • Lower q2, and/or larger • Larger |SfKs | • Could s ~p/2be it? 0.5 TeV Preferred mES Simpler(vsSh’Ks) Anticorrel. noticed first by Khalil & Kou ’03 for Sh’Ks [Murayama et al. ’03] George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  13. Amplitudes hadronic uncertainty V∓ A Reason why Opposite Trend inSfKs vsSKsp0,Sh’Ks Right-handed interactions George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  14. Implication: Wrong Helicity Photon inb sgR • Strength of Mixing-dep. CPV • Test gR component • (Atwood, Gronau, Soni, 1997) • SK*0(Ksp0)gnowPromising • In contrast Bsf g • probably rely on DGBs • Can also test gR comp. via • LPolarization in LbLg • (Mannel, Recksiegel, 1997) Crisp In SM, b sgL Free of hadronic uncertainty George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  15. 1, 0.5 TeV 2, 0.5 1, 0.8 TeV 2, 0.8 Tough (!?) Clean Measure: DmBs, sin2FBs Take s ~ p/2as example • Lighter gluino ~500 GeV Needed • - DmBs > 70ps-1Tough ! • - sin2FBs ~0 - 1 Tough ? • Would’ve preferred [Arhib, Chua, WSH 01] • heavier gluino but for … SfKs < 0 • LHCb can still measure! • CPV in untaggedDGBs also • 100 GeV ? • ~ 200 GeV case • Except, Easier Direct Detection ! Details: WSH and M. Nagashima, hep-ph/0404001 to appear in PRD George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  16. PRL PRL III. fK*Polarization Puzzle Large,NewPhysics, CPC b → s Effect Needed ? George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  17. g b x x Heuristic/Drastic Model On-shell bsg: gis Transverse bsg ~ 3 x 10−4 bsg ~ few x 10−3 0.1% ? 10% BK*g ~ 4 x 10−5 BKT*fT~ 5 x 10−6 min. is “gg” Simple String Fragmentation  Resonances Complicated Color Structure George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  18. Ansatz ad hocterm George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  19. SM and NP “Solutions”: Prediction for wK* absence for rK* SM NP (s = p/2) George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  20. CP and T Violation in Polarization States George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  21. LSP ? ~ 200 GeV ~ 500 GeV IV. Collider Search for Light Tevatron Study w/ Kingman Cheung, hep-ph/0404041 to appear PRD George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  22. Standard b squark limit diluted by dual s-bflavor of George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  23. Cross Sections at Tevatron Dominant ~ 0.1-1 pb ≲ 0.01 pb A few hundred events at few fb−1 George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  24. Question is Decay: bino LSP • or gravitino • Can be Stable? (LSP) Detection • Basically, just a light “b”-squark in Production • so, Discovery not a problem. sin2q is b fraction Anyway, need Good b-tagging ! [s-tagging?] In principle  Heavy MIPs George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  25. standard sbeauty • Discovery (> 10 evts) • up to 300 GeV • w/ 2 fb−1 & sin2qm>0.5 • Single vs double b-tag • contain info on sinqm • b-tag cross section: • check consistency • vs mass reference 1 George W.S. Hou (NTU)

  26. Conclusion • SfKs,SKsp0 ,Sh’Ks Data MayCall for - Larges-b Mixing, w/ New CPV Phase & R.-h. Interaction • fK*Polarization Puzzle may call for Drastic Remedy • A Light Flavor-mixed Squark? Independtly Well Motivated (Flavor & SUSY) • Survive b s g (!) • Can Account for SfKs ≲ 0, butSKsp0 ,Sh’Ks ~ SyKs • DmBs,sin2FBs May BecomeDifficult • SKsp0g nowPromising, and Clean • Search at Tevatron (and beyond) Profitable [offerred] George W.S. Hou (NTU)

More Related