E N D
1. ICS in Action: Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Response
FDA SER Food Safety Seminar
Nashville, TN
November 16-18, 2010
Kimberly Livsey, FDA SER, Emergency Response Coordinator
2. The Beginning….
3. Posture Initial contact from Office of Emergency Operations (OEO) occurred on April 22.
Informal monitoring of the oil spill began by Southeast Region on April 23.
SER Regional Shellfish Specialists (RSSs) OEO assigned coordinator to DWH Incident on April 26.
NOAA started updates to OEO on April 27.
OEO began providing reports to the HHS Secretary’s Operation Center (SOC).
4. ThreatGulf Coast Seafood Industry Overall Economics of Gulf Fisheries in 2008…
Commercial Fishermen
Harvested 1.27 billion pounds of finfish & shellfish
Earned $659 million in total landings revenue
Recreational Fisherman
3.2 million fisherman took a total of 24 million trips
Finfish
Wide variety of fish species in the Gulf of Mexico
Red snapper more valuable finfish species
5. ThreatGulf Coast Seafood Industry Overall Economics of Gulf Fisheries in 2008…
Shrimp
Largest landing in nation with 188.3 million lbs or 73% of total
Blue Crabs
Most economically valuable crab species
LA lands approx 26% or 41.6 million lbs for the nation
Oysters
Leads US in production at 67 percent of total
Over $60 million in dockside value
6. Who’s In Charge National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Lead Agency
Regulate Federal Waters
State Agencies
Responsible for State Waters
From Shore to 3 Miles Out
Exception FL (9 miles)
FDA Support Agency
Jurisdiction over Seafood in Interstate Commerce
7. Expectations NOAA is Lead, but……
FDA
Where are you?
What are you doing?
Last Major Oil Spill:
20 years
Exxon Valdez - March 1989
8. Past Oil Spills Finfish metabolize oil quickly after exposure.
Oysters likely to remain tainted for an extended period after exposure
due to sedentary state.
Shrimp and crab metabolize oil at a faster rate than shellfish but slower than finfish.
9. Past Oil Spills Dispersants used have low potential to bioaccumulate and pose no significant public health risk in consumption.
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH’s) are the chemical hazards associated will oil.
10. Where’s the Oil? NOAA tracked the oil spill on and beneath the surface
Satellites in space
Planes in the air
Boats on the water
Gliders below the surface
Scientists on the ground
11. NOAA issued oil
spill trajectory forecast maps.
Movement based
on wind,
tidal currents,
and weather.
12. Initial Response to Threat Precautionary Closure of Federal Waters by NOAA
36.6% of Gulf waters would be closed to Fishing at the height of Incident
NOAA Fisheries Service announced any changes daily at 12 noon est.
New closed area would become effective at 6 pm est.
Precautionary Closure of State Waters by Individual States
Based on NOAA Trajectory Forecast
State Surveillance and Monitoring
Announced via Public Releases
Mapping Utilized to Depict Closures
15. Posture SER formal monitoring structure is established on April 30
A SER Point of Contact (POC) is designated for each agency responsible for seafood safety in Gulf States.
District Emergency Response Coordinators
Regional Shellfish Specialists (RSSs)
16. SER Activities POCs monitor the opening and closing of state waters, provide technical assistance to and assess the needs of the Gulf States.
SER starts providing daily Situation Reports (Sitreps) to OEO.
20. Incident Command Posts RSSs are assigned as liaisons to Unified Commands in Houma and Mobile.
22. Initial Requests from States Public Messaging Regarding The Safety Of Gulf Seafood
Assistance With A Sampling Protocol
Sample Analysis Methodology
Dispersant Safety
Laboratory Assistance (Capacity)
Sensory Training For States
23. Response from FDA Initiation of Gulf State Calls
Development of Talking Points for States to Use
Communication of Dispersant Safety Info from CDC
Participation of Technical Experts on State Health Directors’ and Governors’ Calls
Partnering with NOAA, AFDO, and IFPTI to provide Sensory Training for States
Collaboration with NOAA on a Sample Analysis Methodology and Reopening Protocol
Identification and Equipping of Laboratories to Run Method
24. IMG Laboratory Unit Analytical Strategy:
Waters are Examined Visually
Samples Chosen and Evaluated by State
Sensory Screeners
Panel of Organoleptic Experts examines
Seafood Sample
Chemical Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
25. Method Throughput Comparison NOAA (8 labs)
Turnaround Time
4-5 days
Each Lab
15 – 20
samples/week
Eight Labs
120 – 130
samples/week
Screening Method
(11 labs)
Turnaround Time
24 – 36 hours
Each Lab
20 samples/day
Eleven Labs
1100 samples/week
26. Mobile Lab Deployment Initially Deployed to Davie, FL
After Oil Spill, Redeployed to Tallahassee, FL
Mid-May through Mid-August
SPME/GC-MSD Technology to Test for Volatiles in Seafood Product
27. IMG Technical Specialists Reopening Protocol
Developed in conjunction with NOAA
Living document
Determining levels of concern
Sampling Procedure
How much to sample of each species
How samples should be handled
28. Reopening Protocol For Waters Closed Due To Oil Impact
Assess Water
Submit Justification for Reopening Waters
Collect Samples
Open by Species
Sensory Analysis
Chemical Analysis
Concurrence Letter
29. Is the Seafood Safe?
31. SER IMT Command and General Staff
33. Operations Section Florida and New Orleans Branches
34. Seafood Assignments FDA initiates Gulf Coast Seafood Assignments to verify the safety of seafood in Commerce
Limited HACCP Inspections
Concentrating on Receiving
Issued Industry Letter
Sample Collection of Seafood Products
35. Seafood Assignments Florida and New Orleans Inspection Branches
Conducted 332 Inspections/Visits over 2 Operational Periods
194 Primary Process
43 Out of Business
33 Inactive
62 Other (2nd, Retail, Clam)
Collected 51 Samples
21 Crab, 15 Shrimp, 12 Oysters
37. Approach To Ensure Safety of Seafood Closures of Federal and State Waters
Inspection and Testing of Seafood at Primary Processors
Reopening Protocol for Federal Waters
Agreed Upon by States
39. Communications Keep Gulf States informed and provide technical assistance
Closures
Reopening protocol
Sampling and inspection assignments
Talking points and press releases
Challenge
Many agencies and players involved
Information did not reach all those impacted
40. Baseline Samples PAH analysis to assist with reopening of waters
Coordinate sample submission
Drawback
Could not be used for the NRDA
41. NOAA/FDA Reopening Protocol States closed waters when oil or other chemical contaminants were observed
Not initiated for precautionary closures
Reopening protocol to ensure consistency was requested by the Gulf states
Approved by Governors and Agency Executives
Buy-in not initially obtained from those implementing the method
42. NOAA/FDA Reopening Protocol Factors to consider for reopening
Nature and extent of observed oil that resulted in closure
Tar balls, oil sheen, light to heavy oiling
Elapsed time since closure and last observance of oil
Potential for future impact based on
Presence of oil in adjacent or nearby areas
Prevailing currents
Prevailing winds
Likelihood that fisheries will be impacted by oil movement within 7 - 10 days
43. NOAA/FDA Reopening Protocol State submits written request to NOAA and FDA for concurrence for reopening of waters
Challenge: Limitations of electronic data
Solution: Required extensive collaboration and input from the states
48. NOAA/FDA Reopening Protocol Concurrence obtained and sampling plan approved
Oysters, shrimp, crabs, and finfish
Challenge: Sample collection
Solution: Flexibility and openings by species
State submits samples to NSIL for sensory analysis
Challenge: Limited number of expert sensory panelists
Solution: Reduced panel size from 10 - 7
49. NOAA/FDA Reopening Protocol PAH analysis by FDA/FERN labs
Challenge: Implementing NOAA PAH method
Solution: Validation of rapid LC method
Challenge: Agreeing upon limits of concern for PAHs
Solution: FDA and states (Fish Consumption Advisory Group) collaborated on final levels of concern
50. Hallelujah! July 15 - The Deepwater Horizon oil leak is finally capped!
52. Deepwater Horizon Response Status SER IMT stood down on August 27
LA only state currently with closed waters
Continue to monitor reopening process
RSS John Veazey is still providing technical assistance
to the state
Tracking complaints and media reports related to oiled seafood
Moving into Recovery Phase
Conducted 2 After Action Reviews
54. Contact Information Kim Livsey
SE Region
Office 404-253-1273
Cell 404-824-5197
kimberly.livsey@fda.hhs.gov
Neisa Alonso
SJN District
Office 787-474-9501
Cell 787-342-2774
neisa.alonso@fda.hhs.gov
Nelson Venerio
FLA District
Office 407-475-4729
Cell 407-415-8415
nelson.venerio@fda.hhs.gov
Wendy Campbell
NOL District
Office 615-366-7806
Cell 615-310-0483
wendy.campbell@fda.hhs.gov
55. Acknowledgements Peter Koufopoulos, FDA Division of Seafood Safety, CFSAN
Selen Stromgren, PhD and Capt. Michael McLaughlin, PhD, Division of Field Science, ORO
LaTonya Mitchell, FDA SRL, Director of Chemistry Branch II, SRL
Wendy Campbell, FDA NOL-DO, Emergency Response Coordinator, NOL-DO
Nathan Beck, FDA Office of Crisis Management, OC
John Veazey, David Wiggins, Marc Glatzer, FDA Regional Shellfish Specialists, SER
Marybeth Willis, FDA Regional Milk Specialist, SER
Larry Estavan, Senior CSO, NOL-DO
AP – Photo of Burning Oil Rig