280 likes | 431 Views
Urban Education in Sacramento. 1999 - Urban Setting: Ethnic and Socioeconomic Diversity5 comprehensive high schools ranging from 1500 3000 students13,000 students system-wide; 600 teachers27% Asian, 23% Caucasian, 24% Hispanic, 21% African American23% English Language Learners. A Crisis in Our
E N D
1. Transforming Schools for Bright Futures Lessons Learned from two Communities’ Work to Save Kids by Transforming their High Schools
Al Rogers, Ed. D., Great Schools Workshop
June, 2006
Presenting at Stanford University’s Central Office Institute
2. Urban Education in Sacramento 1999 - Urban Setting: Ethnic and Socioeconomic Diversity
5 comprehensive high schools ranging from 1500 – 3000 students
13,000 students system-wide; 600 teachers
27% Asian, 23% Caucasian, 24% Hispanic, 21% African American
23% English Language Learners
3. A Crisis in Our Own Backyard Crisis
Less than 1/3 able to attend college
Majority are not proficient in English language arts and math
Average 9th grader in the District obtained more than three “D’s” and “F’s” during the first two semesters of high school
Poor attendance and violence was common
4. The Road to Change Starts witha Community’s Vision Blue Ribbon Committee (1999 – 2000)
2000 Report
Carnegie Corporation of New York – Planning Grant
Making the Case for Change
Community Engagement
Common Vision
Graduate ready for work, university-level study, and citizenship
5. Roadmap to Transformation Reform research and best practices
New York: Julia Richman Education Complex
Boston: Pilot Schools
Philadelphia: Superintendent David Hornbeck
New York; Chicago: Small Schools
Small learning environments, big results
Engine of our transformation
Relevance in a small setting
Higher attendance
Fewer discipline problems
Increased GPA
Less likely to drop out
6. Partners in the Work: Part of the Transformation Partners in the fight
Linking Education and Economic Development (LEED)
Carnegie Corporation of NY
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Facilities Bond
Federal SLC Grants
Charter School Planning and Implementation Grants
7. Portfolio of Opportunity Equity and Excellence
One vision
Schools have to adapt to the unique needs of the communities served
8. E-21 Students First 7 Essential Principles
Small, caring and personalized learning communities
Student-centered system
Student pathways to the work of career, college, and citizenship
Rigorous, relevant, student-driven teaching and learning
Culture of continuous learning
Collective responsibility
School-home-community alliances
9. Two Paths to Big Success Small Learning Communities (SLCs)
6 Comprehensive high schools
36 Themed SLCs
Small Schools
5 free-standing, small, charter high schools
1 free-standing, small high school (non-charter)
2 alternative, small high schools (non-charter)
5 small schools-within-a-school (independent charter)
10. Structures of Change Operations Team
School Design Team
Community Based Organization/Advocacy
Principals Learning Network
Small Schools Network
Teacher Leaders Network
Instructional Cadre
Youth Congress
Parent/Community Liaison
11. Major Lessons Learned in Sacramento Process
Start with the vision for a high school graduate that everyone must own –make the case for change
No incremental change
Cannot live in two worlds
Transformation, not Reform
Everyone has to own this
On-going community engagement
Over-communicate if possible; remind people of the ends sought; refer to the map as you traverse the “chasm of fear.”
12. Results in Stockton: SUSD’s Strategic Approach for Sustainable Results There are at least three strategies to permanent transformation:
Small Learning Communities
Professional Development: Teacher Competencies
Community Support Network
Alignment with existing transformative initiatives
Adoption of proven models as part of the portfolio
New high schools; new results beginning September, 2007
13. Results in Stockton: Initial Steps Alignment
Why Change?
What is our vision of a High School graduate?
(What should a graduate of SUSD know and be able to do?)
Shared ownership amongst stakeholders: Feasibility Studies
Students
Teachers
Parents
Administrators
Community
14. Results in Stockton: Organize for Success Stakeholder groups have organized into structures that allow for coordinated responses to these dilemmas and to literally create and disseminate new learning about how to more effectively support SUSD high school student achievement.
Design Team
Strategic Implementation Teams
Teacher Leaders’ Network
Youth Congress
Advisory Team
Communications
Others…
15. Results in Stockton: Collective Inquiry, Learning, Planning, and Action Inquiry, learn, plan, act:
Teaching and Learning
Staffing
Facilities
Scheduling
Governance
Budget
Relationships/Personalization
16. Results in Stockton: SUSD has been busy… Three 2-day study tours with innovative high schools in Sacramento
Two Site discussion and learning forums
Six District Design Team sessions
Five School Design Team sessions
Four Executive Operation Team sessions
Eleven Focus group interviews
Eight Youth Congress/Site Senate sessions
One Parent/Community meeting
1 Community Based Organization presentation
17. Results in Stockton: Learning is about asking questions and making connections… 394 teacher contacts
44 administrator contacts
173 student contacts
11 parents
18 central office staff or administrators
85 parent/community members
18. Making the case for change (some of what’s been learned) Adults have low opinions and belief systems about their students.
Adults have developed complacency in the face of profound student needs.
Adults are disconnected from the students they serve.
Teachers anticipate profound opportunity for improvement with the use of small learning communities, increased autonomy and accountability.
Teachers distrust central office practices and belief systems.
Little to no evidence of a strong culture oriented toward defining and refining best practices of teaching and learning. Students perceive small, specialized district programs as being far better than the regular programs.
Adults blame students’ culture and home environment for failures at school rather than utilizing culture-based practices as resources for success.
Students’ aspirations for learning and achievement are higher than those the adults hold for them (though the students may have some misinformation guiding their plans i.e., aspirations that are misaligned with their achievement patterns and study habits).
There is a marked absence of community voice and presence in the high schools
19. Key Design Components of an SUSD Small Learning Community (SLC) for Grades 7 - 12