160 likes | 297 Views
Options for common UN procurement Animations. HLCM PN WG Harmonization Procurement Process and Practice Harmonization in Support of Field Operations. ‘Common UN Procurement at the Country Level’: Background and Purpose. 1. Background
E N D
Options for common UN procurement Animations HLCM PN WG HarmonizationProcurement Process and Practice Harmonization in Support of Field Operations
‘Common UN Procurement at the Country Level’: Background and Purpose 1 • Background • The document ‘Common UN Procurement at the Country Level’ (“Guidelines”) was endorsed by the UNDG and HLCM in 2012 • Based mainly on the General Assembly‘s Comprehensive Policy Reviews, progress reports from Delivering as One pilots; these documents encourage the UN System to increase efficiency, effectiveness and coherence at the country level. • Purpose • Facilitate common procurement at the country level, whilst respecting the processes, procedures of individual UN entities • Recommendations for business processes for common procurement, sharing and developing common LTAs, and for common procurement review committees at the country level. • Annexes include templates, forms, and tools required to move forward on common procurement.
Various options of UN cooperation in common procurement are elaborated in the Guidelines 1 These options are further elaborated on the following slides
Using existing LTAs/contracts of other UN organizations (1): Piggy-backing Goods Services 1 3 Invoice To UN-B 2 Purchase Order _____ UN-B UN-B UN-A Supplier 1 Contract / LTA _____ ______ UN-A Supplier
Using existing LTAs/contracts of other UN organizations (2): Re-Use Tender Result Goods Services 1 3 Invoice To UN-B 2 Contract / LTA _____ ______ UN-B Supplier 1 ITB / RFP UN-B UN-A Supplier
Utilizing LTAs/Contracts of other UN entities FOR DISCUSSION 1 Details and main benefits Challenges • Usually the same terms and conditions are used: Prices, Delivery, Services, Obligations • Depending on your agency‘s procurement procedures (no) further procurement review required • Negotiation position of UN entities towards supplier improves indirectly (better service and relationship) • Reduced staff workload: Better use of staff time and effort • See common procurement survey (part 2 of this presentation) for most suitable commodity groups • This model is pursued most frequently at the country level • Needs approval of originating UN entity and supplier • No direct leveraging of UN entities‘ market power with suppliers in terms of volume bundling and lower prices • LTA database with accurate and up-to-date data required
Procurement lead-agency: Joint solicitation Goods Services 1 4a Purchase Order _____ UN-B UN-C UN-D GTCX GTCX 5 Invoice To UN-B, UN-C or UN-D 3b Contract / LTA _____ ______ UN-B Supplier UN-C UN-D 2 ITB / RFP “1 or x LTAs1” UN-A Supplier UN-D 3a Contract / LTA _____ ______ UN-A Supplier UN-C Rep. of UN-A Rep. of UN-B Rep. of UN-C Rep. of UN-D 1 Joint Specs possibly also joint financial, technical evaluation UN-B • Tender needs to specify number of contracts / LTAs and the applicable GTC for the resulting LTA(s)
Procurement lead-agency: Joint solicitation FOR DISCUSSION 1 Details and main benefits Challenges • All organizations receive the same price structure, rates, exemptions and/or service support agreed to with the provider or supplier • Depending on your agency‘s procurement procedures (no) further procurement review required • Direct leveraging of UN entities‘ market power with suppliers • Reduced staff workload: Better use of staff time and effort • Negotiation position towards sup-plier improves directly (preferential terms and rates, better service) • See common procurement survey (part 2 of this presentation) for most suitable commodity groups • Assignment of lead agency: Who drives the procurement process as lead agency and takes on the workload; possibly balancing of workload on several agencies for different commodity groups • Joint requirements specification and joint evaluation requires additional initial effort and coordination
Procurement from UN Entity Goods Services 1 Purchase Order “... based on MoU ...“ _____ UN-B 2 3 Invoice To UN-B UN-B UN-A 1 MoU _____ ______ UN-B UN-A
Procurement from UN Entity FOR DISCUSSION 1 Details and main benefits Challenges • Can enable leveraging another UN entity‘s expertise in procuring certain goods or services • Depending on your agency‘s procurement procedures (no) further procurement review required • Reduced staff workload: Better use of staff time and effort • Can be the fastest way to procure certain goods and services if they are on stock at another UN entity • Handling fee may be incurred by another UN entity – reflecting the administrative overhead which was involved in procuring the goods or services
Outsourcing among UN entities: Procurement action Goods Services 1 5 7 Invoice To UN-B with service fee Invoice To UN-A 6 UN-B UN-A Supplier 4 Contract / LTA _____ ______ UN-A Supplier 3 ITB / RFP 1 2 MoU Request Please carry out procurement action GTC
Outsourcing among UN entities: Procurement action FOR DISCUSSION 1 Details and main benefits Challenges • Can enable leveraging another UN entity‘s expertise in procuring certain goods or services • Depending on your entity‘s procurement procedures (no) further procurement review required • Reduced staff workload: Better use of staff time and effort • Can be a particularly useful model for small UN entities which do not have sufficient procurement expertise or capacity present in a country • Handling fee may be incurred by another UN entity – reflecting the administrative overhead which was involved in procuring the goods or services • Details need to be determined on a case by case basis (Who receives the invoice? To whom are the goodsdelivered?)
Outsourcing: Project including procurement (Option A) Goods Services Project 1 3rd party 5 6 Invoice for project To UN-B with service fee Invoice(s) To UN-A 4 UN-B UN-A One or more supplier(s) 3 Contract(s) _____ ______ UN-A Supplier 2 ITB(s) / RFP(s) 1 MoU for project Please carry out project GTC
Outsourcing among UN entities: Project including procurement (Option B) Goods Services Project 1 3rd party 3 Invoice for project To UN-B 4 UN-B UN-A1 2 Contractfor project _____ ______ UN-B Supplier or UN-A 1 RFP for project GTC • UN-A successfully wins the RFP in a competitive process including other potential suppliers
Outsourcing among UN entities: Project including procurement FOR DISCUSSION 1 Details and main benefits Challenges • Can enable leveraging another UN entity‘s expertise in procuring certain goods or services or delivering certain types of projects (e.g. complex construction works like roads or bridges, running elections etc.) • Can be a particularly useful model for small UN entities which do not have sufficient procurement or project management expertise or capacity present in a country • Handling fee will be incurred by another UN entity – reflecting the adminstrative overhead and project management services which were involved in procuring the goods or services and delivering the project • Details need to be determined on a case by case basis
Contact Alexander Blecken, PhDProcurement Specialist E-Mail: ablecken@unicef.org Office: +45 35 27 31 65 Skype: alexander.blecken Project Team Ann Hasselbalch Chair WG Harmonization E-Mail: ahasselbalch@unicef.org Office: +45 35 27 32 30 Eric Dupont Vice-Chair WG Harmonization E-Mail: dupont@unfpa.org Office: +45 35 46 73 67 Phillip Walker Project Assistant E-Mail: pwalker@unicef.org Office: +45 35 27 31 56 Skype: phillip.walkerUNICEF