140 likes | 159 Views
Explore NATO's challenges in projecting stability and discover ways to address failures and advance strategies effectively. Delve into countering cyber threats, hybrid threats, and more to ensure NATO's response forces and exercises are coherent and aligned with current security needs.
E N D
NATO’s Contribution to Projecting Stability why we are failing and how to fix it Marc Di Paolo International Staff - Operations Division
Horizon 3 illuminate alternative futures Horizon 2 Potential payback from innovation Uncertainty develop new opportunities Horizon 1 extend the core Time
Horizon 3 Cyber threats Counter-space threats Horizon 2 Potential payback from innovation Uncertainty Hybrid threats Terrorism Horizon 1 Projecting stability Rotational forward presence Conventional threats NATO Response Force Exercises Russian nukes Time Air Policing Nuclear deterrence
Horizon 3 Cyber threats Counter-space threats Horizon 2 Potential payback from innovation Uncertainty Hybrid threats Terrorism Horizon 1 Projecting stability Rotational forward presence Conventional threats NATO Response Force Exercises Russian nukes Time Air Policing Nuclear deterrence
Problems with the current approach Expensive failures Requirements > Resources Risk averse decision-making Programs are not coherent, sometimes contradictory
pace of change Horizon 3 Cyber threats Counter-space threats Horizon 2 Hybrid threats Terrorism Horizon 1 Conventional threats Russian nukes Time