300 likes | 1.84k Views
Catalytic Olefin Isomerization. RuHCl(PPh 3 ) 3 will hydrogenate olefins in the presence of H 2 , but it also isomerizes a -olefins to internal olefins through reactions of the Ru-H bond. Catalytic Olefin Isomerization - Product Distribution. 4-centred planar transition state.
E N D
Catalytic Olefin Isomerization • RuHCl(PPh3)3 will hydrogenate olefins in the presence of H2, but it also isomerizes a-olefins to internal olefins through reactions of the Ru-H bond.
Catalytic Olefin Isomerization - Product Distribution 4-centred planar transition state
Enantiomers and their Properties • That 2-butanol and its mirror • image cannot be superimposed • shows that these are two • different molecules • these stereoisomers are enantiomers • Chiral molecules exist as enantiomers • due in most cases to the presence of • an asymmetric carbon • While the influence of chirality on biological activity can be pronounced, the physical properties of enantiomers are identical except for optical rotation.
Diastereomers and their Properties • Stereoisomers that are not mirror images of each other are called diastereomers. • They may chiral molecules (2,3-pentanediol, below) but need not be, as seen for cis- and trans-2-butene. • (2R, 3R) (2S, 3R) • (2R, 3S) (2S, 3S) • Diastereomers have different melting points, boiling points, refractive indices, heats of formation and other physical properties. • Reaction of a racemic mixture with a single enantiomer generates isolable diastereomers.
Production/Isolation of Chiral Compounds • Optical Purity: • where [a] is the specific rotation of the mixture and [a]o is that of the pure enantiomer • Enantiomeric Excess (ee): • Methods of producing/isolating asymmetric compounds: • Kinetic resolution and/or selective crystallization of racemates • Fermentation • Asymmetric transformations of prochiral compounds • enzyme catalyzed functionalizations • chemical hydrogenation, epoxidation, etc.
Catalytic Asymmetric Hydrogenation • A leading example is the synthesis of L-dopa, an optically active drug generated from non-chiral starting materials for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Phosphine ligand of rhodium catalyst precursor
Catalyst Precursors for Selective Hydrogenation • Horner and Knowles at Monsanto (1968) prepared an asymmetric phosphine which, when used in the place of PPh3 in Wilkinson’s catalyst, generated enantioselectivity in the hydrogenation of prochiral olefins. • Refinements in ligand structure • (steric bulk and basicity) • led to steady improvements • in enantiomeric excess. • Best results were observed • for bidentate phosphines.
Catalyst Precursors for Selective Hydrogenation • Ruthenium-base systems have a broad • range of utility as asymmetric catalysts. • a,b-unsaturated carboxylic acids are • hydrogenated in high yield and ee • (S-Naproxen, below) as well as • allylic alcohols. • Note that the BINAP ligand is an • example of a chiral, bidentate phosphine • by virtue of it having atropisomeric forms (isomers that can be separated only because rotation about a single bond is prevented).
Catalyst Precursors for Selective Hydrogenation • Organometallic compounds of the Schrock/Osborn-type have proven to be more selective hydrogenation catalysts than the Wilkinson derivatives: • This catalyst precursor is readily activated by H2 to generate a Rh(I) complex that is coordinated with solvent.
Substrate Coordination in Asymmetric Hydrogenations • Achieving high enantiomeric excesses seems to require a • substrate that is capable of • bidentate coordination. • This secondary • coordination generates • diastereomeric adducts • with rigid • phosphine/ • substrate • arrangements. • Hydroxy, carbonyl, and • amino, groups in an • a-position to the double bond • are suitable.
Hydrogenation Mechanism - Achiral Phosphines • Mechanism of the [Rh(DIPHOS)]+ catalyzed hydrogenation of • methyl-(Z)-a-acetamidocinnamate (MAC).
Reaction Coordinate of an Enantioselective Synthesis • To achieve high enantiomeric • excess, the diastereomeric • transition states of the rate • determining steps must be • substantially different in energy. • The theoretical ee is a strong • function of D(DG‡) as shown to • the left.
Enantioselective Hydrogenation Mechanism k1’’ k-1’’ k1’ k-1’