1 / 17

Some Technical Reflections on an Instance of ‘Friendly Fire ’

Explore the complexities of 'friendly fire' incidents through a case study of a tragic event involving UK and US military forces, examining errors, communication breakdowns, and investigative outcomes.

cseabrooks
Download Presentation

Some Technical Reflections on an Instance of ‘Friendly Fire ’

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Some Technical Reflections on an Instance of ‘Friendly Fire’ Michael Mair1, Patrick G. Watson1, Christopher Elsey1 and Paul V. Smith2 University of Manchester 1 Dept. of Sociology 2 Dept. of Education and Sociology British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Thursday April 16th 2009, Cardiff City Hall, UK

  2. Background 28th of March, 2003, a column of 4 UK “Scimtar” light armoured tanks attacked by 2 US A-10 “Thunderbolt” aircraft http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/gallery/2007/jun/01/internationalnews1?picture=329963022 Attack results in Fratricidal (Friendly Fire) death of Lance Corporal of Horses (L./Cp.) Matty Hull and severe injury of L/Cpl. Alan Tudball http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/man/moremanpics/a-10_1.jpg

  3. List of Friendly Fire Incidents and Accidents Prior to 28th March 2008 • March 22: A British Royal Air Force (RAF) Tornado jet is accidentally shot down by a US Patriot missile. The Tornado’s two crew members are killed. • March 24: Two British soldiers are killed when their tank is mistakenly targeted by another British tank in southern Iraq. • March 27: 37 US Marines are injured when US troops mistakenly fire at each other near the southern city of Nasiriyah. • March 28: A British soldier is killed and four others injured in the region of Basra when a US A-10 ground attack aircraft fires on them. • Accidents: • March 21: A US helicopter crashes in Kuwait killing eight British and four American crewmen. • March 22: Two helicopters from Britain’s Royal Navy collide in mid-air over international waters in the Gulf killing the seven crewmen on board. • March 23: Two US Marines are killed and four others are injured in two separate road accidents in Kuwait and Iraq. Source: Sydney Morning Herald (8th April, 2003) ‘Friendly Fire Incidents and Accidents’, http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/07/1049567623996.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/gallery/2007/jun/01/internationalnews1?picture=329963022

  4. Main Protagonists • Popov 36 and Popov 35 (Popov 36 leads the mission) • Manila Hotel (Air Controller) • Andrew Walker (“the coroner”)

  5. Introductory Remarks • Four years following attack Oxfordshire coroner Andrew Walker finds “Unlawful Killing” • No detailed analysis of what was happening in cockpit video before this point • Not a competing version of prior assessments / adjudications of this incident

  6. Analytic Commentary • Cockpit video as access to “First Time Through” (Garfinkel, 2002) • ‘What happened’ as a contingent course of activity • Audio of straight forward conversation interspersed with “troublemakers” (ibid)

  7. Analytic Commentary “It has been suggested that the pilot had been told the area was clear. This is not the case … POPOV 36 said that he had seen a “four ship”. MANILA HOTEL: “I understand that was north 800 metres”. To assume that this meant that there were no friendlies in the area was a serious mistake. It would not and could not be reasonably taken as confirming that the area where POPOV 36 was flying was clear.” Andrew Walker’s verdict (Crown, 2007, paras 19, 20 & 21)

  8. Linear Transcript Excerpt one: simplified linearisedtranscript • MANILA HOTEL Eh POPOV from MANILA HOTEL, can you confirm you engaged that eh tube and 2 those vehicles? 3 (1) • POPOV 35 Affirm Sir. Looks like I have multiple vehicles in revets about {inhales} uh 800 4 metres to the north of your arty rounds. Can you eh switch fire, an uhm, shift 5 fire, try and get some arty rounds on those? 6 (1) • MANILA HOTEL Roger, I understand those were the impacts that uh you observed earlier on my 8 timing? 9 (>1) 10 POPOV 35 Affirmative 11 (>1) 12 MANILA HOTEL Roger, standby … 13 (1) • POPOV 36 Hey, I got a four ship. Uh looks like we got orange panels on ‘em though. Do they 15 have an uh, any eh, friendlies up in this area?= • MANILA HOTEL =I understand that was north 800 17 metres

  9. Walker’s Analysis • Walker’s orientation to the transcript as an interactional map to orient to conversational outcome • ‘Native’ understandings as resource to characterise moral propriety of engagement • Popov 36’s wilful misunderstanding of what he had been told by FAC • However this is not an instance of linear temporal succession in the transcript...

  10. The Stage Play Transcript • Given the impression that video combined with audio gives “gods-eye view” • Cockpit video amalgam of different various audio communications, video of Popov 36, etc • But Popov 36 could not hear Manila Hotel’s remarks

  11. Popov 35 Confirm no friendlies this far north uh. On the ground? Understand that was North 800m? Multiple Vehicles in Rivetts 800m north... Hey, I got a four ship. Uh looks like we got orange panels on ‘em though. Do they have any uh, any eh, friendlies up in this area? Popov 36 http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ZlMmGAA05zc/RkHXxjbN8NI/AAAAAAAAAGg/hDAzeE_j6rQ/s400/5-9-07b.jpg www.au104.org/Photo1/Images11-15/104Sigs14_10.jpg Manila Hotel (Air Controller)

  12. How to Find a Friendly • Popov 35 and Manila Hotel co-ordinating a separate attack • The ‘they’ to find friendlies • Division of labour and communication of info through co-ordinated pilot activity • Popov 35 as information conduit • No objective view outside of what is being done

  13. Conducting Combat Operations • Anthony King (2003) Staying oriented to same conditions as essential to combat success • Natural language and the practical idiom-in-use that can be tailored to the exigencies of particular situations • CAS III and the conditions of battle – no ground spotters to guide pilots http://www.jessan.com/images/jtac.jpg

  14. CAS III • “Follow the highway leading north until you cross the railroad track, and then turn right over a dark oily looking street. On the left, you will see a large yellow building, looks like a supermarket. Well, that’s not it. It’s on the second floor of the two-story gray [sic] building on the higher ground just behind the yellow one.” (Brown et al, 2006, pg. 1)

  15. Popov 36 Popov 35 Let me ask you a question Coordinating artillery attack on ‘riveted vehicles’ Hey what type of rocket launchers you got up here? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ZlMmGAA05zc/RkHXxjbN8NI/AAAAAAAAAGg/hDAzeE_j6rQ/s400/5-9-07b.jpg www.au104.org/Photo1/Images11-15/104Sigs14_10.jpg Manila Hotel (Air Controller)

  16. Popov 36 Popov 35 Looks like they’re what we’re talking about Are you able to Switch to Crimson? (To Popov 35 and 36) http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ZlMmGAA05zc/RkHXxjbN8NI/AAAAAAAAAGg/hDAzeE_j6rQ/s400/5-9-07b.jpg www.au104.org/Photo1/Images11-15/104Sigs14_10.jpg Manila Hotel (Air Controller)

  17. Conclusion: How the Video Makes a Story • Not interested in augmenting work of boards of inquiries or coroners, simply examining interaction angle • Insights into “First time through” and interactional management of live combat situation • Lynch (1993): if aim is to render actions comprehensible, requires descriptions of “extraordinary scope and specificity” • “Universal observer” (video) not suited to full capture sense of what happened.

More Related