110 likes | 230 Views
Comments on Hatton and Thomas, “Labour Markets in the Interwar Period”. Chris Minns Economic History Department LSE. Hatton and Thomas. Comprehensive description of UK/US unemployment patterns, 1920-1939 Overview review of existing literature (I learnt a lot!). The evidence.
E N D
Comments on Hatton and Thomas, “Labour Markets in the Interwar Period” Chris Minns Economic History Department LSE
Hatton and Thomas • Comprehensive description of UK/US unemployment patterns, 1920-1939 • Overview review of existing literature (I learnt a lot!)
The evidence • 1890-1913: Average UK/US unemployment about 6 percent • 1920-1939: Average UK/US unemployment about 10 percent • UK hit hardest in 1920/21 , US 1929/33 • Long-term unemployment follows shocks in both markets
The argument • Labour market policies and institutions shape rigidities and unemployment experiences • UK: hours cut, increase in union density, changes in wage setting, unemployment insurance rise • US: New Deal-linked supply-side changes, 1933-forwards
The argument / 2 • Intermediate level of rigidities move UK to higher equilibrium unemployment post ‘20/21 • Higher level of rigidities hold up US unemployment, post ’33 • Lesson for history: application of ideas from literature on contemporary unemployment to inter-war setting
Lessons from history? • “Shock and doldrums” in UK, 1920-1937 more relevant to present-day labour markets?
Lessons from history? / 2 • Does experience of 1920s/1930s confirm or revise current views on how rigidities shape unemployment? (e.g. Nickell JEP 1997)
Canada • Similar unemployment to the US • Expansion of relief spending post-1930 • But “Canadian New Deal” derailed by Liberal election victory in 1935, ruled unconstitutional in 1937
Lessons from history / 3 • How bad will long-term unemployment be? • 1920s/30s evidence suggests human capital atrophies quickly with time out • Is general human capital relatively important deeper into skill distribution today? • Does migration mute potential long-term unemployment?
Lessons from history / 4 • Long-term unemployment engage electioneering politicians • Labour: Future Job Fund, LTU aged 18-24. • Lib Dems: top-up payments for 18-24s on work placement schemes • Tories: The Work Programme – picks up under 25s at 6 months, expansion of apprenticeship