100 likes | 114 Views
State of the Art and other Projects. Used State of the Art Technologies. Support technologies used for project management and development process: Unified Process (UP) Unified Modelisation Language (UML). Unified Process. Iterative development Architecture-centric Risk driven
E N D
Used State of the Art Technologies • Support technologies used for project management and development process: • Unified Process (UP) • Unified Modelisation Language (UML) REGNET Final Project Review
Unified Process • Iterative development • Architecture-centric • Risk driven • Careful requirements management and change control • Continuous verification of quality • Use case-driven REGNET Final Project Review
UML everywhere REGNET Final Project Review
Kernel technologies • Mainly open-source • Implementation technologies: Java, PHP, ASP • Integration technologies: Web Services (SOAP, WSDL), ebXML (Hermes MSH) • Data management technologies: Ixiasoft/Textml, Apache/Xindice, MySQL • Presentation technologies: Apache Web server, Apache/Jetspeed Portal • Operating systems: Linux, Windows REGNET Final Project Review
Contacts The network of contacts has been extended with a particular attention to target groups coming from the cultural heritage domain during conferences, workshops, fairs... • Extra European contact with the Research Library Group (USA) . • EU Projects: OpenHeritage, Kulturerbe, EUREKA – EUROCARE , CLEF, VNET5, COVAX, CULTOS, DigiCULT, EP2010, VICODI, REGNET Final Project Review
Technical vision for the SEEMSingle European Electronic Market REGNET Final Project Review
Clustering with OpenHeritage • Integration of technical tools, mainly in the collections management area. • Legal framework. Where REGNET has focused on its development and OpenHeritage on its validation and implementation; • Territorial Service Centers (TSC): each project have pointed out its own peculiarities, with support and tourism functionality clearly belonging to OpenHeritage, while meta-collections access, workflow and e-business models and practices clearly carried out by REGNET. For what concern e-commerce it has been carried out by both but distinguished in focus and target; • Portals: OpenHeritage has clearly specialized in providing community services and media brokering services for professional operators, while REGNET has focused on general portal. REGNET Final Project Review
Complementary Objectives • The REGNET Project is going to deliver a system, providing a technological and organizational infrastructure to service centres aimed at supporting cultural institutions and industries. • One of the main objectives of the Open Heritage project, instead, is the development of dynamic, computable models of territorial cultural systems to assess and valorize the qualities and strengths of each regional or local cultural system. REGNET Final Project Review
Complementary Objectives • REGNET aims to set up a network of (primarily non-profit) cultural service centres providing latest technology (via the REGNET system and expertise) on reasonable costs for regional cultural heritage institutions. • The final output of the Open Heritage is the launch of a global "OpenHeritage.com" enterprise for the exploitation of the European CH. REGNET Final Project Review