1 / 10

Concern for the Individual

Concern for the Individual.

curran-bradshaw
Download Presentation

Concern for the Individual

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Concern for the Individual The individual survey items were combined into composite scales, which provide for a global perspective of the survey results. For comparison to our campus means, Noel-Levitz provides the mean of all responses nationally within our comparison group of four-year private schools. The national means are based on 276,006 responses from 378 four-year private schools that recently participated in the SSI. National results are available only in the form of individual item and scale means. These scales provide a good overview of Embry-Riddle’s strength and areas in need of improvement. Concern for the Individual assesses the institution’s commitment to treating each student as an individual. Those groups that deal with the student on personal level (e.g., faculty, advisors, counselors, residence hall staff) are included in this assessment. Slide #2 shows the average satisfaction and importance for the items included in the scale for both ERAU campuses and for all students from private four-year schools nationally. This slide is followed by several slides for each item that makes up the scale: a comparison of national and campus means over time, a comparison of the ‘percent satisfied’ for each campus over time, and where appropriate, one graph per campus comparing the data across degree programs.

  2. Concern for the Individual

  3. Counseling Staff Care About Students as Individuals(Percent Responding “Somewhat Satisfied”, “Satisfied”, or “Very Satisfied”)

  4. Counseling Staff Care About Students as Individuals(Average Response) 1 = Not satisfied at All; 2 = Not Very Satisfied; 3 = Somewhat Dissatisfied; 4 = Neutral; 5= Somewhat Satisfied; 6 = Satisfied; 7 = Very Satisfied

  5. Faculty Care About Me as an Individual(Percent Responding “Somewhat Satisfied”, “Satisfied”, or “Very Satisfied”)

  6. Faculty Care About Me as an Individual(Average Response) 1 = Not satisfied at All; 2 = Not Very Satisfied; 3 = Somewhat Dissatisfied; 4 = Neutral; 5= Somewhat Satisfied; 6 = Satisfied; 7 = Very Satisfied

  7. Residence Hall Staff are Concerned About Me as an Individual(Percent Responding “Somewhat Satisfied”, “Satisfied”, or “Very Satisfied”)

  8. Residence Hall Staff are Concerned About Me as an Individual(Average Response) 1 = Not satisfied at All; 2 = Not Very Satisfied; 3 = Somewhat Dissatisfied; 4 = Neutral; 5= Somewhat Satisfied; 6 = Satisfied; 7 = Very Satisfied

  9. This Institution Shows Concern for Students as Individuals(Percent Responding “Somewhat Satisfied”, “Satisfied”, or “Very Satisfied”)

  10. This Institution Shows Concern for Students as Individuals(Average Response) 1 = Not satisfied at All; 2 = Not Very Satisfied; 3 = Somewhat Dissatisfied; 4 = Neutral; 5= Somewhat Satisfied; 6 = Satisfied; 7 = Very Satisfied

More Related