40 likes | 54 Views
Explore the viewpoints of Rationalism, Empiricism, and Naïve Realism in philosophy. Understand how knowledge is acquired through reason or the senses, and delve into the concepts of a priori and a posteriori knowledge.
E N D
Rationalism: Knowledge Is Acquired through Reason, not the Senses • We know only that of which we are certain. Sense experience cannot guarantee certainty, so all that we know comes from reason alone and is a priori (i.e., prior to experience) • Our (innate) knowledge of certain propositions is based on remembering truths acquired before birth Plato (427-347 BCE)
Empiricism: Knowledge about the World Is A Posteriori (Based on Experience Alone) • At birth the mind is a blank slate (tabula rasa), containing no innate ideas. Even if some ideas were known universally, that does not prove they are innate • Knowledge comes from sensation or reflection • Ideas of “primary qualities” (e.g., solidity, shape) represent things as they really are; ideas of secondary qualities (e.g., colors) represent things only as they appear to us John Locke (1632-1704)
Naïve Realism: We Do Not Perceive Ideas; We Perceive Their Objects John Searle • Perceptions are always “intentional,” that is, about something; and when our perceptions are caused by the things they are about, we can be said to know those things • Perceptions are not purely passive; they are affected by one’s background knowledge and beliefs
Analytic and Synthetic Judgments Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) David Hume • Hume: propositions are either relations of ideas (analytic, a priori) or matters of fact (synthetic, a posteriori) • Kant: propositions in mathematics (7+5=12) and metaphysics (“all events have causes”) are synthetic a priori judgments • Quine: meanings of terms in even a priori analytic propositions depend on experience