360 likes | 623 Views
Report Corporate Services CIAT Board Meeting #63 Nairobi, Kenya , 13 May 2011. Albin Hubscher. Index. Decisions BoT 62 Financial Result 2010 Financial Outlook 2011 Progress report - Corporate Services Area OCS – One Corporate System (ERP). 1. Decisions last BoT.
E N D
Report Corporate Services CIAT Board Meeting #63 Nairobi, Kenya, 13 May2011 Albin Hubscher
Index Decisions BoT 62 Financial Result 2010 Financial Outlook 2011 Progress report - Corporate Services Area OCS – One Corporate System (ERP)
1. Decisions last BoT • Budget 2011 Approved with revenues of $ 58.2 M, expenses $67.2 M, cost recovery $10.4 M and net surplus of $1.5 M • Salary increases for 2011 • IRS salary adjustments:Global consumer prices index = 1.87% * 75% = 1.4% (average between Europe and US) • NRS salary adjustments in Colombia:IPC (local consumer price index) + 1% as negotiated with CIAT Union = 3.17 +1 = 4.17% • NRS salary adjustment elsewhereInflation
Statement of Financial Position 2010 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Statement of Activity 2010 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) Variance % 27% 20% 177% 50%
Expenses by Natural Classification (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) Variance % 20% 19% 23% 41% (17%) 20% 20%
Reasons for Exceeding Financial Forecast At November 2010 BOT , we estimated a surplus of $3.6 million • Opportunity to cash in on bond investments - $1.9 million • Higher budget execution in Nov. and Dec. additional recovery - $0.3 million • Delay in execution of Ag Ministry funds - $0.3 million Resulted in a final surplus of $6.1 million in 2010
Total Research Execution 2008 – 2010 (Unrestricted + Restricted)
Total Research Execution (Unrestricted + Restricted as of March)
Restricted Execution vs Budget by RA As of March 31 / 2011(expressed in million USD) CC&CB Other
Unrestricted Execution by RAAs of March 31 / 2011(expressed in million USD) CC&CB
Self Generated Income As of March 31 / 2011 (expressed in thousand USD)
Monthly Operating ResultAs of March 31 / 2011(expressed in million USD) • Low project execution results in lower cost recovery • Lower unrestricted funds results in research over commitment
Current Unrestricted/CRP Funding (expressed in million USD) 19
Actions to Reach Budget Target • Concentrate on CRP’s with mayor CIAT participation • Stability Funding plan • Active donor contact • Non traditional fundraising focus • Restrict or time hiring of new staff • Control or delay expenses • Maximise other income
Cash or Equivalent Available 2011 Vs 2010 (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
CostRecovery 2011 (expressed in millions of U.S. dollars)
Future CIAT Funding Sources • New CGIAR • Fund (World Bank as Trustee) Fund Council decisions • Window 1 (system costs and possibly CRP’s • Window 2 (for CRP’s only) Donor decision • Window 3 (donor support to center) • Bilateral (from donors to centers directly) CGIAR donors • Restricted (for CRP and Non-CRP activity) • Unrestricted (unlikely, will go through window 3)Non – CGIAR donor • Restricted (for CRP and Non-CRP activity) • Unrestricted (to center i.e. infrastructure) • Earned or self-generated income 23
2011 Upsides & Downsides • Upsides: • Increased donations from Australia and Belgium ($0.3 m) • Strengthening of foreign currencies against the USD • Downsides: • No unrestricted contribution from EC ($1.2m) • Exchange rate year end forecast = $1,750 COP/USD • Cash weaknesses due to the delay in disbursements from Fund/Donors • Researchers time dedicated to developing CRPs • 2% System costs for bilateral – unbudgeted • Unrestricted over commitment - $1.9 m against budget
Highlights - 2010 • Increased days of reserves with self generated funds • Conducted Corporate Services Survey • Implemented Web based Performance Evaluation system • Successful transfer of Employee Welfare Fund to Creciat • Completed budgeting process of 11 CRP’s and established program and operating structure for CCAFS • Consolidation of Africa Corporate Services • Established new travel services - Carlson Wagonlit Tour • Established center wide Wi-Fi access at HQ • Implemented New Corporate Identity • Negotiated lines of credit for almost $20 million
CIAT Social Responsibility 2010 • A total of US$ 180,000 invested in CIAT Social Welfare Activities befitting employees as follows: • 69% education, 27% sports, cultural and health events, 2% communications, 2% Psychology and solidarity support • 350 employees and family members received Capacity Building • 250 employees and family members participated in Training Classes to improve human values • 450 participants in “Learning to be good parents” and “Financial responsibility” classes • 2000 participants in sports and cultural activities • 1320 health services extended to families and members • Multiple support provided for Social, Calamity and Funeral services
Challenges 2011 • Contract a new HR Head • Incorporate CCAFS into CIAT • Start planning for implementation of OCS • Continue infrastructure improvements • Achieve surplus of $1.5 million – days of reserve • Outsource payroll • Replace the phone system • Implement financial control mechanisms in Africa 28
OCS – One Corporate System OCS = ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) Update
Structure and Limitations Central Processing Project Management Back Office incl. Finance Report Generation Document Management Regional Helpdesk Human Resources • Same Charter of accounts • No customization
Current Status – Center Commitments • Implementing in 2011: commitment letter signedCIP, IRRI, WorldFish • Implementing in 2012: commitment letter under development ICARDA, Bioversity, Africa Rice • Intend to change but after 2012: commitment letter neededCIAT, ICRAF, ILRI, Consortium • Undecided:CIFOR, CIMMYT, ICRISAT, IITA, IMWI • Declined: IFPRI
Current Status – System Platform Agresso Business World, Unit4 Business Software • Not US non profit compliant • Questions about the project management module • Very few users – DFID • Up-front payment required now for acquisition and certain licenses – all part. Centers • Hosting decision is pending CIAT’s Oracle platform and Project Manager developed in-house works
OCS Implementation Costs(expressed in Thousand USD) CIAT Participation Cost – Up-front payment 2011 Approx. $ 35,000 2012 Approx. $150,000 without planning costs