1 / 6

StvCA comparison

This comparison analyzes the performance of Stv and Sti tracking at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, with improvements from CA. Stv pulls are still an unresolved issue, while Stv forward tracking for ETR is working well.

cwheeler
Download Presentation

StvCA comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. StvCA comparison V. Perevoztchikov Brookhaven National Laboratory,USA

  2. Main tasks • Stv pulls are too big. Not solved yet. • Stv forward tracking. Tested for ETR (ESTAR). Working as expected. Some problem raised, not related to Stv; • CA gave improvement for Sti but not Stv. Fixed. Comparison follows. StarSoft local

  3. Compare.1 StarSoft local

  4. Compare.2 StarSoft local

  5. Compare.3 StarSoft local

  6. Summary If just to count + and – we got: StiCA/Sti = 16/4 = 4 StvCA/Stv = 9/7 = 1.3 Stv/Sti = 14/11 = 1.3 StvCA/StiCA = 13/10 = 1.3 CA for Sti gives improvement 4 times but Stv only 1.3 Stv for both CA and no CA gives improvement 1.3 StarSoft local

More Related