140 likes | 261 Views
State Regional Haze SIP Development. Critical Path for Western States. “Simple” Process? . Regional Planning Organization (WRAP) Forums, Committees Multiple States and Tribes Multiple Federal Agencies FLM’s EPA Multiple Planning tracks Long Planning horizons. Which Planning Path?.
E N D
State Regional Haze SIP Development Critical Path for Western States
“Simple” Process? • Regional Planning Organization (WRAP) • Forums, Committees • Multiple States and Tribes • Multiple Federal Agencies • FLM’s • EPA • Multiple Planning tracks • Long Planning horizons
Which Planning Path? • 40CFR 51.308 • Participate with other States/Tribes in Regional Planning Organization. • Go it alone • 40CFR 51.309 • Available to Nine GCVTC Regional Transport States, Tribes within those States
Choices, Choices • “309” Planning Path • AZ, CA, CO, ID, NV, NM, OR, UT, WY, and Tribes within • Control Strategies already developed through GCVTC Recommendations, Annex • Presumptive “Reasonable Progress” to improve visibility in 16 Colorado Plateau Class I areas (Low Hurdle) • Submittal due by Dec., 2003
Choices, Choices (cont.) • “308” Planning Path • RPO • Initial “Committal” SIP (defer core requirements) • Due 1/3 yrs after EPA designates PM2.5 Attainment/Non-Attainment areas • Full SIP, w/core requirements due NLT 2008 • Go it Alone • Initial SIP addresses core requirements • Due 1/3 yrs after EPA designates PM2.5 Attainment/Non-Attainment areas
WRAP Technical Work To Date Mostly to provide information for 308/309 decisions, support for initial 309 SIPs
What you should know by June 30, 2002 for 308/309 decision • Steps 1-4 of 12-step SIP process • Definition of Natural Conditions • Indication of PM2.5 Attainment/Non-Attainment Status • Indication of timing of EPA designations • Timing, scope of initial SIP submittals (2003 vs. 2005, or so; 16 Class I areas vs. all other Class I areas) • Levels of Demonstration of Reasonable Progress (Annex presumed to be Reasonable Progress)
What you should know by June 30, 2000 (continued ) • LTS Content in initial SIP (Annex vs. Other control measures) • Annex/BMT vs. BART (No. BART sources) • Clean Air Corridor Boundaries • Projected Visibility Improvement in 16 class I areas, 1996-2018 • Point source SO2 emission reduction 1990-2000 • Other • Reasonable Attribution, Critical Mass, etc.
What you might not know by June 30, 2000 (What you don’t know won’t hurt you… ) • Definition, Mobile source significance, Level of visibility impact in 16 Class I Areas • Definition, Road dust significance, Level of visibility impact in 16 Class I Areas • Visibility impacts from increased Rx Burning and Agricultural Burning • Other
Where We are now… 5a 1 2 3 4 5 5b WRAP input Through June 30 A-M 5c WRAP input through Dec. ’02 N-W 6/2002
The next 1 ½ Years… Enabling Leg. Committal SIP LRS? 6 Sched. dep on PM2.5 des dt, att. status Enabling Leg. Long Range Strategies 6 7 8 Enabling Leg. BSMT, ESMP Etc. 12 6,8 9c 10 11 Earliest Anticipated PM2.5 designations 1/2003 6/2003 1/2004
On to 308 SIP’s 12(1) 9a 10 11 Sched. dep on PM2.5 des dt, att. status 9b 10 11 12 Start SIP for Other Class I Areas 1/2005
Latest Anticipated PM2.5 Designations At last…(at least for awhile) 7 8 9b 10 11 12(2) 5 yr rev. PM, NOx 7 8 9b 10 11 12 5 yr rev. 1/2009 6/2008 6/2005
“Simple” 5 Yr. rev 12 Start SIP Revision 5 Yr. rev 6/2017 1/2014 1/2019