440 likes | 609 Views
Michael “Mick” Peterson PhD University of Maine C. Wayne McIlwraith DVM, PhD Colorado State University. Surfaces Standardized Tests, Engineering Support & National Laboratory. Recommendations of: The Welfare and Safety of the Racehorse Summit Keeneland Sales Pavilion
E N D
Michael “Mick” Peterson PhD University of Maine C. Wayne McIlwraith DVM, PhD Colorado State University Surfaces Standardized Tests, Engineering Support & National Laboratory
Recommendations of: The Welfare and Safety of the Racehorse Summit Keeneland Sales Pavilion Lexington, Kentucky March 17-18, 2008 RECOMMENDATION 1: TRACK SURFACES Primary Objective: Promote consistent and safe track surfaces conditions
What is Needed? • Clearinghouse for surfaces data • Reliable & consistent testing • Risk assessment data • Sharing of methods • Different regional needs • Create a culture of data
Practice Not Research • Track Materials – Synthetic & Natural • Non-linear More loadthe harder • Strain rate dependent • Synthetic creep • Dirt shows dynamic softening • Not easy or standard tests
Consistent Track Composition • Consistent test methods • New methods when needed • Database of results for research Open to all users:Non-proprietary methods A Single Reliable Lab for the Industry
Measurement Methods:Dirt Composition • Many tests for dirt established • Need comparative data • Not repeatable between labs • Clay mineralogy (X-Ray Diffraction) • Fiber weight percentage
Small or missing peaks Implementation:X-Ray Diff. (XRD) • Clay mineralogy • “East Coast” vs. “California” • “No” clay in most east coast tracks
Measurement Methods:Synthetic Composition • Wax composition • Temperature sensitivity New Funding
Implementation:Quality Control of Materials • Sand Matters…even in synthetic surfaces • Microscopy • XRD Mineralogy
Implementation for Two Tracks: Different Wax, Different Performance
Permeability – Sensitive Topic • April 28, 2008: Bangor Raceway has cancelled Wednesday & Friday race cards due to unsuitable track conditions. • From Bangor Daily News • Postponement irk Horsemen • Heavy Rains Prove Problematic for Harness Horsemen STARDARD MEASUREMENTS BEFORE THE START OF THE MEET
Laboratory for Analysis of Track Materials • A central lab to compare between tracks • Consistent data • Current labs:agriculture civil engineering • Data for research • Link to injury database • Developing new tests of materials • Coordinating high cost specialized testing XRD, DSC
Central Track Surfaces Lab • Modeled on drug testing labs: But this is on the ground floor • National facility: Regional duplication only if needed • Initial seed money: • Capital costs • Initial labor, training and “certification” • Continuing funding • Initial investors, forms part of the board to determine research priorities • Tracks subscribe, standard package • Pay per test on added materials and as needed
Maintenance Matters • Different tracks do things differently • Justified reasons • Weather • Design • Usage • Develop best practices
Maintenance & Condition Reporting System Start simple, research leads to expansion… The model – start simple On-Track Injury …catastrophic, then expand Jeff Blea & Wayne McIlwraith … other injuries
Maintenance & Condition Reporting System • Weather data logging • Data logger for at standard location • Temperature, humidity, precipitation, wind, UV & visible light, evaporation rate and track temperatures • Linked to maintenancereporting database (and handicapping?)
Performance TestingWhat the Horse Sees….. • The perfect surface needs to perform in the real world • Temperature • Moisture • Maintenance • Performance of the surface • Shear strength • Stiffness Performance Testing
Performance testing… • On-site performance monitoring • Research must show that the measures relate to safety of the horse • Daily measurement of performance • Periodic measurement of composition Do the research and determine which factors pose a risk
Surface has different function during phases of gait: Impact/loading • Lower vertical modulus reduces strain rate and peak loads • Shear failure reduces horizontal peak accelerations
Surface has different function :Breakover/Propulsion • Shear strength to support hoof during propulsion • Control hoof rotation during turn http://www.wyammyranch.com/horses/sangria.jpg
Issues with Harness Racing • Dynamic shear loading is higher than thoroughbred horses • Hoof problems and soft tissue issues with surface Thanks to our model: Dorunbluefortunate
1° impact 2° impact Support Breakover (midstance) A B C D From Thomason and Peterson, VCNA. From Thomason and Peterson, VCNA.
Biomechanical Hoof Tester • Biomechanical Hoof Tester • Started in 1998, testing in 2004 • Comparison of 26 tracks and 6 Synthetic Tracks • During breaks (40 min) • Simultaneously measure shear and hardness
Fast Slow Soft Hard SurfacePerformance Vertical Variability Shear Variability • Location on the graphAmount of variability
Fast Fast Slow Slow Soft Soft Hard Hard Example: What Happens? Rip, Till and then Set a Racetrack? Softer & More Variable Slightly Faster A hard track is not necessarily low shear
Centralize Results for Research • Central data repository • Maintenance methods • Performance testing • Track composition • Data can be tied to outcomes • Learn as methods evolve
Funding to get to this Stage • Initial funding: AQHA Racing • Second year of funding: Oak Tree, Del Mar, Fairplex, CARF, Santa Anita, Hollywood, TOC • Funding from Dolly Green, Southern California Equine Foundation and Oak Tree • Pay for services from tracks since 2005 • Current research grant Grayson-Jockey Club • Need a mechanism to implement the research
Laboratory Anticipated Cost and Revenue Model • Expected to be self supporting in fourth year, • Total capital costs: $178,500 • Total labor costs (first three years): $205,000 • Initial funding from consortium of users • Capital costs primarily year 1 and 2 • Labor expense growth through year 3 • After capital costs covered: ~20 tracks to support full time operation
Track Testing Machine • First machine • Additional engineering cost • “End user” software • First machine, $208,000 • Machine 2 through 5 • Real time database link • Significant fabrication savings • Overall cost 22% lower Shared cost, shared machines: Testing within financial realities of industry Big Fresno Fair
Database and Monitoring • Database costs and track personnel costs • Make use of existing personnel • IT people with backside experience • Integrate into existing workflow • Capital costs modest • Weather station and wireless system: $2600 • Hardware for maintenance system: $3000
Philosophy – Culture of Data • Need to provide a common set of measures • Measures based on: • Biomechanics • Procedures • Consistent track material • Support research: • What surfaces are safe? • When are they unsafe (climate, composition?) • Provide tools & lab support to evaluate materials • Need to move the entire industry forward, being sensitive to financial realities of tracks.
How to Move Forward • Basic performance tests …consistently performed • Evaluate the results – safety & performance! • All track maintain shear without excess hardness • Multiple answers • Climate • Materials
The remaining question:Epidemiology?It only matters is we help horses and riders
Issues in Musculoskeletal Disease • Conformation • Individual predisposition • Pre-existing disease • Shoeing • Training • Track surfaces • Multi-factorial risk No disease no breakdown…. Tracks did not “cause” the problem, they CAN improve the situation
Acknowledgements • Initial support & encouragement, Dan Fick AQHA Racing • Continued research funding: Grayson Jockey Club Research Foundation, Polytrack, Del Mar, Keeneland, Santa Anita, CARF, TOC, Fairplex, Dolly Green Foundation, Oak Tree Racing Association
Barbaro Making tracks Better for the entire sport Questions? Union Fair
What is Measured? • Vertical stiffness • Resistance to slip • Both should be dynamic becauseof the speeds of the horse This matches tests for synthetic turf playing surfaces ASTM F1551-94
High dynamic load Shear Lower dynamic load Vertical No failure, do not cup out Use shear failure, reduce accelerations The Ground Reaction
Implementation:Ground Penetrating Radar • Imaging of base and track consistency • Available for diagnosing local base problem, image before you dig • Base line on 14 tracks including synthetics
Simpler Tests… Temperature • Clegg hammerWeak correlation to times at Del Mar • Temperature was a better (and easier) predictor • Clegg hammer may work on turf (not harrowed) • Clegg hammer not sensitive to harness tracks – care about shear Time (sec.) Clegg
3) Research on track materialsSome Data Needs to be Explored Yes the data is repeatable! Is this wax surface sensitive to moisture not temperature?
Implementation: Wax DSC Added wax High temperature wax used initially New wax reduces temperature sensitivity at critical 100-125°F