1 / 28

Selective screenability, products and topological groups

III Workshop on Coverings, Selections and Games in Topology April 25-29, 2007 Serbia. Selective screenability, products and topological groups. Liljana Babinkostova Boise State University. Selection principle S c ( A , B ).

daisy
Download Presentation

Selective screenability, products and topological groups

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. III Workshop on Coverings, Selections and Games in TopologyApril 25-29, 2007Serbia Selective screenability, products and topological groups Liljana BabinkostovaBoise State University

  2. Selection principle Sc(A,B) A and B are collections of families of subsets of an infinite set. For each sequence (Un: n<∞) of elements of A there is a sequence (Vn: n<∞) such that: 1) Each Vn is a pairwise disjoint family of sets, 2) each Vn refines Un and 3)  {Vn: n<∞} is an element of B.

  3. The game Gck(A,B) The players play a predetermined ordinal number k of innings. In inning n: ONE chooses any On from A, TWO responds with a disjoint refinement Tn of On. TWO wins a play ((Oj,Tj): j< k) if {Tj : j < k } is in B; else ONE wins.

  4. Gck(A,B) and Dimension O denotes the collection of all open covers of X. For metrizable spaces X, for finite n the following are equivalent: (i) dim (X) = n. (ii) TWO has a winning strategy in Gcn+1(O,O), but not in Gcn(O,O).

  5. Gck(A,B) and Dimension For metrizable spaces X the following are equivalent: (i) X is countable dimensional. (ii) TWO has a winning strategy in Gc(O,O).

  6. HAVER PROPERTY For each sequence (εn: n<∞) of positive real numbers 3)  {Vn: n<∞}is an open cover of X. there is a corresponding sequence (Vn:n<∞) where 1) each Vn is a pairwise disjoint family of open sets, 2) each element of each Vn is of diameter less than εn, and W.E.Haver, A covering property for metric spaces, (1974)

  7. Property C and Haver property When A = B = O, the collection of open covers, Sc(O,O) is also known as property C. 1) In metric spaces Sc(O,O) implies the Haver property 2) countable dimension => Sc(O,O) => Sc(T,O) • Notes: • T is the collection of two-element open covers. • Sc(T,O) is Aleksandroff’s weak infinite dimensionality D. Addis and J. Gresham, A class of infinite dimensional spaces I, (1978)

  8. Haver Property does not imply Sc(O,O) Example X=M  L M - complete metric space, totally disconnected strongly infinite dimensional. L – countable dimensional s.t. M  L is compact metric space.

  9. Z Haver property ≠ Property C L Z M L – countable dimensional Z  M, Z – zero dimensional (compact subset of totally disconnected space)

  10. Alexandroff ’s Problem Is countable dimensionality equivalent to weak infinite dimensionality? R.Pol (1981): No. There is a compact metrizable counterexample.

  11. The Hurewicz property For each sequence (Un: n<∞) of open covers of X Hurewicz Property: there is a sequence (Vn: n<∞) of finite sets such that 1) For each n, Vn Un and 2) each element of X is in all but finitely many of the sets Vn. W. Hurewicz, Über eine Verallgemeinerung des Borelschen Theorems, (1925)

  12. The Haver- and Hurewicz- properties For X a metric space with the Hurewicz property, the following are equivalent: 1) Sc(O,O) holds. 2) X has the Haver property in some equivalent metric on X. 3) X has the Haver property in all equivalent metrics on X.

  13. Products and Sc(O,O) (Hattori & Yamada; Rohm,1990) : Let X and Y be topological spaces with Sc(O,O). If X is σ-compact, then XxY has Sc(O,O). (R.Pol,1995):(CH) For each positive integer n there is a separable metric space X such that 1) Xn has Sfin(O,O) and Sc(O,O), and 2) Xn+1 has Sfin(O,O), but not Sc(O,O).

  14. Products and Sc(O,O) Let X be a metric space which has Sc(O,O) and Xn has the Hurewicz property. Then Xn has propertySc(O,O). If X and Y are metric spaces with Sc(O,O), and if XxY has the Hurewicz property then XxY has Sc(O,O).

  15. Products and the Haver property Let X be a complete metric space which has the Haver property. Then for every metrizable space Y which has the Haver property, also XxY has the Haver property. Let X and Y be metrizable spaces such that X has the Haver property and Y is countable dimensional. Then XxY has the Haver property. Let X and Y be metrizable spaces with the Haver property. If X has the Hurewicz property then XxY has the Haver property.

  16. Haver and Sc(O,O) in topological groups Let (G,*) be a topological group and U be an open nbd of the identity element 1G. Open cover of G: Onbd(U)={x*U: xG} Collection of all such open covers of G: Onbd={Onbd(U): U nbd of 1G}

  17. Haver and Sc(Onbd,O) in topological groups Let (G,*) be a metrizable topological group. The following are equivalent: • G has the Haver property in all left invariant metrics. • G has the property Sc(Onbd, O).

  18. Products and Sc(Onbd,O) in metrizable groups Let (G,*) be a group which has property Sc(Onbd,O) and the Hurewicz property. Then if (H,*) has Sc(Onbd,O), GxH also has Sc(Onbd,O).

  19. Games and Sc(Onbd,O) in metrizable groups If (G,*) is a metrizable group then TFAE: • TWO has a winning strategy in Gc(Onbd, O). • G is countable dimensional.

  20. Relation to Rothberger- and Menger-bounded groups S1(nbd,O) Sc(nbd,O) S1(Onbd,O) Sc(Onbd,O) None of these implications reverse.

  21. New classes of open covers X-separable metric space CFD: collection of closed, finite dimensional subsets of X FD: collection of all finite dimensional subsets of X

  22. Ocfd and Ofd covers Ocfd – all open covers U of X such that: X is not in U and for each CCFD there is a UU withC U . Ofd – all open covers U of X such that: X is not in U and for each CFD there is a UU withC U .

  23. Selection principle S1(A,B) Aand Bare collections of families of subset of an infinite set. For each sequence (Un: n<∞) of elements of A there is a sequence (Vn: n<∞) such that: 1) For each n, Vn Un 2) {Vn: nN }  B.

  24. Sc(O,O) and S1(Ofd,O) Let X be a metrizable space. S1(Ofd,O) => Sc(O,O) Sc(O,O) ≠> S1(Ofd,O)

  25. New classes of weakly infinite dimensional spaces Sfin(O,O) Sfin(Ocfd,O) Sfin(Ofd,O) S1(Okfd,O) S1(Ocfd,O) S1(Ofd,O) Sc(O,O) Sc(T,O) KCD SCD CD

  26. S1(Ofd,O) and products If X has property S1(Ofd,O) and Y is countable dimensional, then XxY has property S1(Ofd,O).

  27. S1(Ocfd,O) and products If X has property S1(Ocfd,O) and Y is strongly countable dimensional, then XxY has property S1(Ocfd,O).

  28. III Workshop on Coverings, Selections and Games in TopologyApril 25-29, 2007Serbia Thank you!

More Related