260 likes | 561 Views
Istituto Nazionale Tumori - Milano. Ri-resection of colorectal liver metastases: the experience of INT-Milan. Liver metastases from colorectal cancer A multidisciplinary approach. Role of Surgical Resection.
E N D
Istituto Nazionale Tumori - Milano Ri-resection of colorectal liver metastases: the experience of INT-Milan
Liver metastases from colorectal cancer A multidisciplinary approach Role of Surgical Resection • No existing treatment other than surgery can result in long term survival and even in cure [Nordlinger, JCO 2002] • Long survivals are now observed after resection of large or multiple metastases, where surgery would have been refused some years ago [Azulay, Bismuth, Ann.Surg 2002]
Resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer INT experience 1996-2004 40 % OS 20 % DFS Patients at risk OS 110 71 47 38 25 15 4 211 171 DFS 61 35 23 17 13 9 2 211 116 211 patients: median follow-up 46 months
[Nordlinger, Cancer 1996] OS DFS 28% 15% [Fong, Ann Surg 1999] 37% 22% Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases: Long-term results 1568 patients French Multicentric Study, 1968-1990 1001 patients MSKCC, 1985-1998
Recurrence after surgical resection • Recurrence is observed in 60-70% of patients after liver resection of liver mets • Some patients, who recur after liver resection, can undergo repeat resection with apparently similar benefit
Studies on repeated hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases
Complication rate after liver ri-resection Mortality 0-5 % Morbidity25 % • Postoperative ascites 5-10 % • Bile leak 3 % • Liver failure 1-5 % • Haemorrage 1-2 % • Infections 1-6 % • Pleural effusion / pneumonia 5-10 % • Pulmonary embolism 2 % [Nordlinger, 1994; Scheele, 1995; Adam 1997; Fong 2002]
Repeated hepatic resection for recurrent liver metastases INT experience 1996-2004
Repeated hepatic resection for recurrent liver metastases INT experience 1996-2004 OVERALL SURVIVAL 40 % 48% 20 % Patients at risk OS 21 16 11 11 6 21 21 patients: median follow-up 48 months
Repeated hepatic resection for recurrent liver metastases INT experience 1996-2004 DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL 40 % 19% 20 % Patients at risk DFS 21 10 8 4 21 patients: median follow-up 48 months
Ri-resection of liver metastases a) Ri-resection for liver recurrence • Portal vein embolization (PVE) and two-stage hepatectomy • Combined intraoperative approach withRF ablation • Pre-operative chemotherapy (neoadjuvant) b) “Salvage resection” for ablation failures • Increasing indication
Combined intraoperative approach to colorectal liver metastases Resection • rule out of extrahepatic disease • intraoperative liver ultrasound • histology, grading, biological markers + Radiofrequency • treatment of histologically-proven unresectable associated mets
Combined intraoperative approach to colorectal liver metastases Multiple liver metastases from colorectal cancer 68 years old man 2/2001 S8 segmentectomy Postoperative CT 2/2002 multiple liver recurrence (S2-3-4-6-7) Treatment: S2-S3-S6-S7 wedge-segmentectomy (6 nodules) intraoperative radiofrequency (S4: 2 nodules) Outcome: patient alive and well 6 months later
Patients characteristics (INT 2000-2004)
Resection + RF in colorectal liver metastases INT experience 2000-2004 Results: survival 25 patients Median follow-up 11 months
Resection + RF in colorectal liver metastases Conclusions based on INT experience • Radiofrequency techniques added to liver resection in case of multifocal disease could extend indication for surgical approach • Residual metastases (< 3 nodules, < 2 cm) could be the best candidates for intraoperative RF • Patients selection could improve cost-effectiveness
Resection of liver metastases “Salvage resection” for ablation failures
Resection of liver metastases “Salvage resection” for ablation failures
Surgical resection of liver metastases: new promises How to decrease post-operative recurrence ? • Post-operative chemotherapy Sistemic vs locoregional with hepatic artery infusion (HAI) • Post-operative immunotherapy
Vaccination with HSPPC-96 in patients withliver metastases from colorectal carcinoma OVERALL SURVIVAL 51% Patients at risk 29 28 26 23 23 22 17 16 13
Vaccination with HSPPC-96 in patients withliver metastases from colorectal carcinoma DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL 25% Patients at risk 29 25 15 13 12 10 7 7 6
Vaccination with HSPPC-96 in patients withliver metastases from colorectal carcinoma OVERALL SURVIVAL Immune responders Immune non-responders p < 0.0001 Patients at risk 17 17 17 17 17 17 14 14 11 Immune responders Immune non-responders 12 9 6 5 3 2 2 11 6
Vaccination with HSPPC-96 in patients withliver metastases from colorectal carcinoma DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL Immune responders Immune non-responders p < 0.0001 Patients at risk 17 16 14 12 11 9 7 7 6 Immune responders Immune non-responders 12 1 1 1 9 1
Conclusions • Vaccination of patients with liver metastases of CRC with autologous HSPPC-96 is feasible and safe • Approximately 60% of patients developed a T-cell mediated response to colorectal carcinoma antigens • Both OS and DFS were longer in T cell responding than in non-responding subjects, independently from other prognostic factors
Surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases: recent advances and multidisciplinary approach • Ask for surgical consultation before decisions on treatment plan • As long as surgery is curative (R0), resect as many metastases as possible • Add radiofrequency ablation as a complementary technique during surgery within controlled clinical trials • Resect, if possible, any case showing tumor downstaging after chemotherapy