1 / 23

Flow Unit Definition in the Lower Clear Fork and Wichita: Example from Fullerton field

Flow Unit Definition in the Lower Clear Fork and Wichita: Example from Fullerton field. Presented in Midland, Texas at UL/PTTC May 2003 Workshop by the Bureau of Economic Geology. F. Jerry Lucia, Stephen C. Ruppel, and Rebecca Jones Bureau of Economic Geology

damian-ortega
Download Presentation

Flow Unit Definition in the Lower Clear Fork and Wichita: Example from Fullerton field

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Flow Unit Definition in the Lower Clear Fork and Wichita: Example from Fullerton field Presented in Midland, Texas at UL/PTTC May 2003 Workshop by the Bureau of Economic Geology. F. Jerry Lucia, Stephen C. Ruppel, and Rebecca Jones Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78713-8924

  2. 3D Permeability Model – Phase 1 Study Area

  3. CONCLUSIONS • Using upward shoaling and tidal-flat-capped high-frequency cycles as a basis for flow layers works well in the lower Clear Fork • High-frequency cycles are not well defined in the Wichita and flow layers are based primarily on lithology and porosity • The lower Wichita interval contains collapse breccias and flow may be dominated by touching-vug pore systems. Flow layers defined by porosity.

More Related