1 / 58

New Results from D Ø

New Results from D Ø. John Hobbs (Stony Brook) For the DØ Collaboration. This summer (since mid May) >30 preliminary results 12 papers submitted >42 TOTAL from all physics areas : B physics, EW, Higgs, New Phenomena searches, QCD, top physics

damita
Download Presentation

New Results from D Ø

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Results from DØ John Hobbs (Stony Brook) For the DØ Collaboration

  2. This summer (since mid May) >30 preliminary results 12 papers submitted >42 TOTAL from all physics areas: B physics, EW, Higgs, New Phenomena searches, QCD, top physics Some have improved techniques, some with increased luminosity, some new topics, (and some a combination of these) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  3. Discuss a subset of results all results deserve fuller treatment no discussion for results in recent W&Cs: also see DØ results area for full list and notes and papers Thanks to my DØ colleagues for all their hard work… First Observation of a New b-baryon Ξb, June 15 Measurements of the Lb Lifetime @DØ, July 13 Top Quark Physics @DØ as a probe for new Physics, July 20 www-d0.fnal.gov/Run2Physics/WWW/results.htm FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  4. Data Taking and Performance In ’06 shutdown, installed Layer 0 silicon L1 calorimeter trigger upgrade Since then 1.7 fb-1, delivered lumi 1.5 fb-1, recorded 87% operating efficiency Reprocessed all data using improved reco by end May Thank you, accelerator division! FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  5. In this talk • Foundation Physics from EW & QCD • Building blocks supporting other results • Anomalous Couplings • The top program • Beyond-the-Standard-Model searches • B Physics • Higgs Searches FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  6. EW & QCD Results • s(W+c-jets)/s(W+jets) • ds/dpT(Z) • s(WZ) and anomalous couplings • Zg Production and anomalous couplings‡ • s(pp->Z)*B(Z->tt) • Measurement of U(1S) & U(2S) polarization ‡publication FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  7. 1 fb-1 Foundation I: W+(c-jets) • boson + heavy flavor is crucial for continued improvement in Higgs search • Want full program W/Z+c, cc, b, bb • 1st measurement of W+c-quark production • Method • Charge correlation between a lepton from charm decay and W lepton • W + m-tagged jet(s) Dominant modes shown FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  8. Shape consistency illustration Light vs. heavy A PLOT s(W+c-jet) s(W+jet) b vs. c = 0.071 ± 0.017 Jets, pT>20 GeV, |h| < 2.5, (no unfolding) Alpgen+DØ sim predicts = 0.040 Foundation I: W+c Charge symmetric background subtracted by SS vs. OS comparison FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  9. 1 fb-1 Foundation II: pT(Z) • Test of theory • both soft and hard QCD • Generators for W mass, width, … • Previous: limited yZ • Now, up to |yZ|=3 • Z -> ee final state Low pT(Z): tests resummation (Collins, Soper, Sterman) pT(Z) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  10. pT(Z) Melnikov, Petriello PRD 74, 114017, )2006) pT(Z) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  11. en mn hadronic 1 fb-1 Foundation III: Z->tt • A number of results use hadronic t decays • Measuring s(pp->Z) in Z->tt cross checks our ability to identify hadronic t decays Obvious physics benefit from cleanly identifying hadronic decays t Branching Fractions FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  12. Foundation III: Z->tt +5.0 -12 compare to prediction 252 pb Method Use Z -> tt -> m+th Signal prediction Instrumental Bkg (from OS, SS) s(pp->Z)*B(Z->tt) = 247 ±8(stat) ±13(sys) ±15(lumi) pb Increases confidence in our th results FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  13. 1 fb-1 Look at processes pp -> WZ -> eee eem mme mmm Anomalous Couplings • WWZ trilinear coupling (recently also, ZZg/Zgg) Assume an effective Lagrangian, and look for deviation from SM coupling values (SM diagrams) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  14. Anomalous Couplings Fit number of events and Z pT spectrum Model independent and 2x better than previous best (LEP) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  15. The Top Program Mass, mt Expected B(t->lvb) Other states Production rate, s Couplings Look for other particles masquerading in production or decay (all tt all the time?) W in-decay properties, e.g. helicity FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  16. Top Mass mt, dilepton MWT and combination mt from s(tt) Cross sections s(tt) in l+trk s(tt) in l+th s(tt), dilep combinition B(t->Wb)/B(t->Wq) & s† Dilepton cross section‡ l+jets cross section‡ New Physics in Prod/Decay Search for stop in ttbar† ttbar Charge Asymmetry† W helicity in top decay ttbar resonance search† s(tt; l+jets)/s(tt; ll) Single top update Top Physics: New Results †prev. W&C ‡publication FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  17. Top Program dilepton (e/µ) 6% 's 14% all jet 46% lepton + jets Top decay - final states this discussion primarily dileptons dilepton lepton + jets e/µ + jet 34% FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  18. 1 fb-1 Top Program: Improvements Mass, mt • Update result w/matrix weighting method. • Added ee and mm to existing em and improved selection, … • Combine with result from n weighting method Use template methods for mt in dilepton final states => Compensate for underconstrained kinematics FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  19. Top Mass DØ Preliminary FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  20. Correlation n weighting mass DØ Preliminary Matrix weighting mass (GeV) Top Mass • Combine Matrix weighting result with neutrino weighting result (same data set) Ensemble studies mt = 173.7 ± 5.4 ± 3.4 GeV FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  21. Top Cross Section • Recover lost acceptance in dilepton final states: l+track • Use leptons which fail identification by finding a high-momentum, isolated track • Orthogonal to standard ll Gain additional 30% acceptance l+track only +0.9 +0.8 -0.9 -0.7 • = 6.2 (stat) (syst) ±0.4 (lumi) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  22. Top Program 's 14% all jet 46% lepton + jets dilepton lepton + jets e/µ + jet 34% dilepton (e/µ) 6% Top decay - final states Note historical situation: t’s aren’t considered leptons for top…  Focus on an unexplored region,l+t FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  23. Top Program: s(tt)*B(tt -> ltbb) • Further expanding the program • Look for deviation in t modes (from, e.g. H+) • About 2/3 of selected “tt -> lt” is really from tt-> l+jets or tt -> ll • Consider cross-talk from other ttbar channels (e.g l+jets with t fake) as background. • Recompute cross section, moving other top contributions into background category s(tt)*B(tt->ltbbnn) = 0.19 ± 0.08(stat) ± 0.07(syst) ± 0.01 (lumi) pb SM, sB = 0.126 pb FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  24. 1 fb-1 Top Program: Reinterpreting s • Use recent cross section measurements for additional information • From measured values compute • For a H+, if MH≈ MW and if B(H+ -> cs) = 1 s(tt), lj s(tt), ll +0.27 -0.26 R = = 1.21 (stat+sys) e.g. in MHDM, radiative corrs. w/in MSSM,… B(t->Hb) < 0.35 (95% CL) expected, B < 0.25 (95% CL), if B=0 FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  25. Top Program: Reinterpreting s Looking at methods of measuring mt with different implicit assumptions? Extract the mass from the cross section s(tt) from l+jets channel Measured mt = 166.9 (exp)(th) +5.9 +3.7 -5.2 -3.8 FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  26. BSM Searches: New Results • t -> c + c0 • q search in th + jets + ET • c±c0 in trileptons, eel • b’ -> Z+b, “Long Lived Parents of Z’s” • 3rd generation LQ in ttbb • GMSB in gg • t pairs in dileptons + ET + b-jets‡ • H -> gg • H±± -> m+m-m+m- • LQ3 in b-tagged jets + ET‡ ‡publication FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  27. 1 fb-1 SUSY: t-> c + c0 • R-parity implies stop pair production • For c0 as LSP, and . mc < Mt-mc0 < mW + mb • 2 (charm) jets plus MET in the final state t -> c + c0 FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  28. 2 jets, pT > 40(20) GeV df(jj) < 165 lepton, track vetos ET > 60 GeV SUSY: t-> c + c0 Basic Preselection (partial list) then flavor tag (>= 1 jet) mass dependent optimization HT (GeV) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  29. SUSY: t-> c + c0 Composition* W->ln+jets 20.6 ± 2.3 Z ->nn+jets 13.2 ± 1.8 W->ln+HF 11.9 ± 1.1 Z ->nn+HF 11.6 ± 0.8 other 7.0 ± 0.4 Total 64.3 ± 3.2 Data 66 *use Z->ee+jets to normalize Z->vv+jets FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  30. 1 fb-1 Predicted Final Yields Signal (80,160)* 4.7 ± 0.4 Signal (100,150) 7.1 ± 0.6 Bkg 1.7 Data 2 +0.6 -0.4 q Search in th + jets + ET 1 or 2 t’s in final state *(m0,m1/2) here are t’s again FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  31. q Search in th + jets + ET LEP2 excluded B(c1+-->c10tn) LEP2 excluded tan(b)= 15, A0=-2m0, m<0 FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  32. Run IIb data 0.9–1.7 fb-1 SUSY Chargino/Neutralino ->trileptons • New result in eel After initial selection After partial selection Pred. Bkg 208± 7 Data 182 FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  33. SUSY trileptons After full selection Signal 1-2 evts* Pred Bkg 1 ± 0.3 Data 0 Limit moves from m>140 GeV (all channels) to m>146 GeV *Depending on SUSY parameters FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  34. B Physics: New results • Bs Mixing Update • Search for Bs–> m+m- Decay (1 fb-1‡; 2 fb-1†) • Lb lifetime in semileptonic decay‡† • 1st Observation of Xb ‡† • Direct CP violation in B+ -> J/y K+ • Search for FCNC in D mesons‡ • Observation of B**‡ †prev. W&C ‡publication FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  35. 2.4 fb-1 Mixing: What’s in the Update? • More data: 2.4 fb-1 (2x previous) • Better detector: Layer 0 silicon • Track-by-track IP resolution uncertainty • Same side flavor tagging (SST) • Additional channel: hadronic decays • Better boost description Experimentally demanding FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  36. Mixing: Two of the Improvements Bs hadronic decays Improved flavor tagging Tag eD2 Old OST 2.5 ± 0.2% SST 1.7 ± 0.6% New OST 4.5 ± 0.9% (evt charge) m trigger Dse, Dsp 22 ± 5% FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  37. Mixing -logL 3.1s Dms Channels: mfp efp mK*K pfp 2.4 fb-1 (Data thru end May) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  38. B± -> J/yK± using asymmetry A = N(B+ -> J/yK+) – N(B- -> J/yK- ) N(B+ -> J/yK+) + N(B- -> J/yK- ) B Physics: Direct CPV, B+ -> J/y K+ • Compare rates of opposite charge states + FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  39. B Physics: Direct CPV, B+ -> J/y K+ • Possible at DØ, magnet polarity flipping • Detector effects largely cancel A = +0.0067 ± 0.0074 (stat) ± 0.0026 (sys) 1% sensitivity, 2x better than PDG FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  40. Higgs Searches: What’s New? • Improved techniques (WH, ZH) • NN in analysis and input to limit • Separate into n-tags and k-jets • Increased lepton acceptance (30%, e) • … and more … • More luminosity: • WH, WW(partial) channels both with IIa+IIb data samples. • WH -> WWW* with IIa (1 fb-1) FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  41. 1–1.7 fb-1 Higgs Searches: New Results • Low Mass (MH < 135 GeV) • WH -> lnbb • ZH -> llbb • Intermediate Mass • WH -> WWW* • High Mass (MH > 135 GeV) • H->WW -> mth • H -> WW -> em FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  42. 1-1.7 fb-1 Higgs Searches: Low Mass WH -> lnbb, Preselection FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  43. Higgs Searches: Low Mass ≈Variables: pT,j1, pT,j2 DR(jj), pT,dijets, MJJ, pT(l,MET) Now using a NN for final stage. Fit NN output for final result NN output =1 b-tag No tag >= 2 b-tag FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  44. 1-1.7 fb-1 High Mass: H->WW->em Basic preselection then multivariate for final stage NN output FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  45. Higgs: WH Limit WH -> lnbb FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  46. FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  47. Conclusions • DØ running well • IIb average efficiency, 87% • using new Layer 0, L1 Cal trig. • >42 new results • All major physics areas • Broadening the program • Improved techniques • Up to 2.4 fb-1 in analysis • Yet essentially all are statistics limited FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  48. BACKUP FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  49. Top Mass FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

  50. l+jets 1 fb-1 Top Program: Cross Section & Decay • Simultaneous measurement of s(tt) and R=B(t->bW)/B(t->qW) in l+jets channel • Predict b-jet multiplicity as function of R • Use l+jets channel • Overall yield and • 0, 1 and 2-tag yields Fit yields as function of sand R FNAL Wine and Cheese, DØ/Hobbs

More Related