1 / 6

Figure 13.1 Sensory analytical discrimination test – paired comparison and A/not-A.

Figure 13.1 Sensory analytical discrimination test – paired comparison and A/not-A. Figure 13.2 Sensory analytical discrimination test – triangle. Figure 13.3 Sensory analytical discrimination test – duo-trio. Figure 13.4 Sensory analytical discrimination test – dual standard.

damon-haney
Download Presentation

Figure 13.1 Sensory analytical discrimination test – paired comparison and A/not-A.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Figure 13.1 Sensory analytical discrimination test – paired comparison and A/not-A.

  2. Figure 13.2 Sensory analytical discrimination test – triangle.

  3. Figure 13.3 Sensory analytical discrimination test – duo-trio.

  4. Figure 13.4 Sensory analytical discrimination test – dual standard.

  5. Figure 13.5 QDA spider plot of sensory attributes. Each spoke in the wheel represents a sensory attribute. Entries are product mean values for each attribute. At the center of the wheel = low intensity; at the end of each spoke = higher intensity. Products that exhibit quantifiable sensory differences can be evaluated by target consumers. Then, by using a variety of multivariate analysis techniques, the key sensory characteristics that most influence target consumer liking can be designed into products, as well as providing a benchmark versus key competition. When consumer-based sensory evaluation techniques are used in conjunction with marketing and marketing research techniques, it provides an effective business strategy for brand management.

  6. Figure 13.6 Example of a QDA spider plot of fruit yogurt. Results illustrate product similarities and differences by attribute. Control was: Higher/Stronger in Overall Flavor, Bitter Taste, Sour Taste, Thick Mouthfeel, and Lingering Aftertaste; Lower/Weaker in Sweet Taste, Yogurt Flavor, and Raspberry Flavor.

More Related