150 likes | 279 Views
VoIP Meeting. ENUM 04/05/2006. Rui Ribeiro & João Pereira. Jan Ruzicka, Michal Krsek (CESNET) Erik Dobbelsteijn (SURFNET) Rui Ribeiro, Joao Pereira (FCCN) Antonio Pinizzotto, Marco Sommani (CNR) Bernie Hoeneisen, Bea Huber (SWITCH). Roll Call. Meeting Objectives.
E N D
VoIP Meeting ENUM 04/05/2006 Rui Ribeiro & João Pereira
Jan Ruzicka, Michal Krsek (CESNET) Erik Dobbelsteijn (SURFNET) Rui Ribeiro, Joao Pereira (FCCN) Antonio Pinizzotto, Marco Sommani (CNR) Bernie Hoeneisen, Bea Huber (SWITCH) Roll Call
Meeting Objectives • Discuss dynamic routing schemes, like ENUM, and choose a common platform to be used for all. • To achieve a consensus in the way that ENUM is used and propose it in the TF-VVC meeting at TNC2006.
Agenda • ENUM Essentials • Bernie’s Presentation about ENUM • ENUM Trees • e164.arpa • nrenum.net • e164.org • ... • Proposal to TF-VVC / TNC 2006
ENUM Essentials • Bernie did a presentation, explaining his experience in the implementation of ENUM in Switzerland; • During the presentation, the participants discussed the topics and exchange experiences;
ENUM definition • ENUM was defined to be implemented in the arpa tree; • All the other ENUM trees (E164.org or nrenum.net) are considered private trees. • NREN’s aren’t Telco Carriers, therefor should not use Carrier ENUM;
ENUM trees • The participants agreed that the slow development of the arpa tree is making it unusable, and we have to search for alternatives.... At lest for now • It was said that was important to start using ENUM now, and we cant wait for the arpa tree delegation
ENUM trees 2 • All agreed that searching in more then 4 trees would be too much. • Erik had the idea of a central proxy that could search a lot of ENUM trees. • DNAME resource record, was tested and it works • ISN – Internet2 Numbering Scheme (ENUM like) • Other solution presented was a private ENUM tree for NRENs (nrenum.net).
Why not e164.org • Pros • Good web interface • Lightweight structure / management / provisioning / validation function / open to all • Cons • Open to all • Unknown developments • No formal connections to the NRENs • Not trustable
NRENUM.net • Bernie proposed a private ENUM tree: NRENUM.net • This tree should be controlled by the NRENS and used in the countries where the arpa tree is unavailable; • NRENUM.net delegations are delivered to the NRENs, and the NRENs can decide how and who to register. • NREN’s trust between them selfs
NRENUM.net • Michal Krsek (CESNET) defended the exclusive use of the arpa tree, with the exception of the nrenum.net in the countries without arpa • Marco Sommani (CNR) reported the slow implementation of ENUM in Italy. He is very interested in the use of NRENUM.net
Billing • In Switzerland they are not billing for the ENUM registers, but this may be done in the future. • Rui proposed that the billing should be made by resource record and not by telephone number • The participants agreed
Proposal to the TNC • The chosen trees (and lookup order) decided in this meeting are: • 1. e164.arpa • 2. nrenum.net • This list is going to be presented in TNC 2006
AOB • The VoIP meetings/group should continue even if no TF-VVC sucessor • Other systems may be used: • nrenum.net website • Mailling lists • WebGroup engines
Conclusion • ENUM is the solution for dynamic routing; • People want to use arpa, but it is tied up in politics; • NRENUM can be the transitory solution and good for training the future arpa introduction;