1 / 13

Open Collaboration Exchange

Open Collaboration Exchange. Alexander Blanc , Niels van Dijk, Jocelyn Manderveld , Remco Poortinga - van Wijnen VAMP 2013, Espoo. Current situation ( good news ). AAI/FIM well established across Europe and elsewhere

danae
Download Presentation

Open Collaboration Exchange

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Open Collaboration Exchange Alexander Blanc, Niels van Dijk, JocelynManderveld, Remco Poortinga - van Wijnen VAMP 2013, Espoo

  2. Currentsituation (goodnews) • AAI/FIM well establishedacross Europe andelsewhere • Solid growth (NL) on number of connectedIDPs, SPsandusage • eduGAINbridges HE&R fields

  3. SURFconextstatistics

  4. Most used services • All ‘campus centric’ type of services (notsurprisingly) • Alsointernal services (portal, timetable, …) • Institutionssomewhatreluctantto move to the cloud (for employees) • Google appsmostlyforstudentsonly

  5. But… • eduGAINonly start of a solution (enabling) • AlthougheduGAINconnects HE&R, no bridge toother (commercial/research) communities/fieldsyet (see VCH) • (HE&R) FederationstypicallynotallowedtoconnectotherIdPs • Most IdPs focus on ‘campus centric’ services • Difficultto get IdPstoconnectto services for a subset of users • E.g. VO services… • Opt-out vsopt-in? • Try ‘zero attribute’ authentication? • No simplemagic solution

  6. So… • Can we applyideasfrom the networkworld? • Especiallynetwork exchanges? • See FromNetwork Exchange toCollaboration Exchange - A guided tourhttps://tnc2012.terena.org/core/session/10 • Make it easy toconnectand let participantsdecidewhothey want toworkwith

  7. O.C.E. why? Transnational • Several use cases show: • Federated approach needed as ‘enterprise’ IDM trust models are poorly suited for collaborative cross-sector and transnational activities • Transnational collaboration is hindered by differences in federation readiness, licensing issues, technical and other barriers. • OCE allows entities to connect to multiple trust frameworks on one technical platform • OCE will support several well established trust frameworks (e.g. eduGAIN) by default • OCE significantly lowers barriers for transnational cloud service delivery

  8. O.C.E. why? Cross-sector • OCE supports cross-sector collaboration capabilities out of the box • OCE specifically supports public/private partnerships • Therefore decreasing need for guest access • OCE enables knowledge transfer on federated approaches from research and education to other sectors

  9. What are Open Collaboration Exchanges? • An transnational infrastructure for identity- and service providers to interconnect, facilitating authentication-, authorization- and group management processes • An infrastructure; • that combines a technical infrastructure (a "switchboard") with multiple behavioural trust/policy frameworks • and thus allows entities to connect to multiple trust frameworks on one technical platform • An open and secure platform, using open standards, based on open source (OpenConext) technology • Self-service configuration interfaces forall participants • Ecosystem for ‘value-added services’, such as a higher level of authentication, statistics, provisioning, metering/billing, etc. • Aimed towards implementation of multi-stakeholder governance and maintenance • Enabler of cross-sector and transnational collaboration and service delivery

  10. O.C.E. Whatit is not • A replacementforeduGAIN • Leverages/useseduGAINandother services/trust frameworks • Pixiedustforcollaboration • Still a lot (most?) effort for non-technical issues • A trust frameworkitself • ‘Only’ aggregatorwithoptionaladdedself-servicefunctions • A finished product • Stillverymuch a concept/idea, manymanythingsstillunclear

  11. O.C.E.Overview • Entree • IDP1 • SP1 • DIGID • IDP1 • SP1 OCE (metadata) • trust framework2 • IDP1 • SP2 • eduGAIN • IDP1 • IDP2 • SP2 SP1 IDP1 • Trust framework • SURFconext • DIGID • Trust framework • eduGAIN • SURFconext • DIGID OCE (self-service) SP2 IDP2 • Trust framework • eduGAIN • Trust framework • eduGAIN • WAYF

  12. O.C.E. What’s next? • Engage • Different (european) educational federations • Several OpenConext pilot partners • eduGAIN • Global partners • Learn • AMS-IX, Netherlight and other exchanges • Possible similar ideas, initiatives or projects • Partnerships • Work with strategic partners on innovation, governance, and funding • Pilots • In research and education • Cross-sector

  13. O.C.E.pointers • eduGAINwww.edugain.org • OpenConextwww.openconext.org • From Network Exchange toCollaboration Exchange - A guidedtour https://tnc2012.terena.org/core/session/10 • MARIO https://tnc2013.terena.org/core/session/27 • CollaborationExchange for Services andIdentitieshttps://blog.surfnet.nl/?p=2392

More Related