230 likes | 441 Views
Characterization of CNT using Electrostatic Force Microscopy. Vadim Karagodsky. Probing induced defects in individual carbon nanotubes using electrostatic force microscopy, T. S. Jespersen et al., Appl. Phys. A 88, 309–313 (2007).
E N D
Characterization of CNT using Electrostatic Force Microscopy Vadim Karagodsky • Probing induced defects in individual carbon nanotubes using electrostatic force • microscopy, T. S. Jespersen et al., Appl. Phys. A 88, 309–313 (2007). • Charge Trapping in Carbon Nanotube Loops Demonstrated by Electrostatic Force • Microscopy, T. S. Jespersen et al., Nano Lett, 5, 1838-41 (2005). • Characterization of Carbon Nanotubes on Insulating Substrates using • Electrostatic Force Microscopy, T.S. Jespersen et al. Electronic Properties of Novel • Nanostructures, 786, 135-138 (2005)
AFM basic operation – oscillating mode • The cantilever is oscillated • at its resonant frequency. • The oscillation is detected • by the reflected laser at the • photodiode. • The atomic forces between • the tip and the sample • modulate the oscillation. • The cantilever is raised • until the oscillations get • back to initial state. • The raised distance is • proportional to the surface • topography.
AFM tip and resolution Atoms of sodium chloride sensed by AFM (2007).
EFM - basic operation • Similar to AFM, but: • Voltage Vs is applied. • The tip is raised to tens nm • above the surface. • At this height, the atomic • forces can be neglected but • the Coulomb force remains. • The information is • obtained from phase shift. • The Coulomb force has a • longer range, and therefore • the CNTs appear hugely • amplified in diameter. (Vs=-5V h=60nm)
AFM vs. EFM AFM: (-) Relatively slow (-) Small scanning areas (tens m across) (+) high resolution (CNT diameter) (+) can work on conducting surfaces.
AFM vs. EFM EFM: (+) Rapid (+) Larger surfaces (hundreds m across) (+) Provides electrical info. (-) low resolution. (-) Does not work on conducting surfaces. AFM: (-) Relatively slow (-) Small scanning areas (tens m across) (+) high resolution (CNT diameter) (+) can work on conducting surfaces.
EFM – Basic theory Harmonic oscillator equation:
EFM – Basic theory Harmonic oscillator equation: Solution:
EFM – Basic theory Harmonic oscillator equation: Solution: Frequency shift and phase shift:
EFM – Basic theory Harmonic oscillator equation: Solution: Frequency shift and phase shift:
EFM – Basic theory Harmonic oscillator equation: Solution: Frequency shift and phase shift:
Experiments relying on EFM Quick estimation of CNT density using phase-shift histogram.
Experiments relying on EFM • Proving that CNT loops can trap surface charges. • Two loops initially contain charges
Experiments relying on EFM • Proving that CNT loops can trap surface charges. • Two loops initially contain charges • The lower loop was discharged by grounded AFM tip.
Experiments relying on EFM Identification of special CNT structures (loops) with respect to predefined alignment marks in large samples (100m X 100m). Low resolution EFM scan resolved the CNTs. AFM scan with the same resolution did not resolve the CNTs.
Conclusions • EFM is a powerful technique for rapid • characterization of CNTs on insulating surfaces. • EFM can operate under ambient conditions. • In the experiments reported here, EFM was found to • be at least 100 times more time efficient than AFM. • EFM provides electrostatic information that is not • available through topographic AFM scans. • EFM cannot be used on conducting surfaces. • EFM does not provide CNT diameter information.