560 likes | 922 Views
AIM OF PRESENTATION. . A presentation of current research into the field of benzodiazepine sedation for anxious adolescent dental patients. PRESENTATION. Guidelines for conscious sedationCurrent sedation techniquesBenzodiazepine sedationCurrent research .
E N D
1. Benzodiazepines: A novel “route” to sedation for the anxious adolescentKathy WilsonSenior Dental Officer & Honorary Staff GradeSouth Tyneside PCT & Newcastle Dental School
2. AIM OF PRESENTATION
3. PRESENTATION
Guidelines for conscious sedation
Current sedation techniques
Benzodiazepine sedation
Current research
6. CONSCIOUS SEDATION
7. Current Guidelines “A Conscious Decision”
DOH 2000
“Maintaining Standards”
GDC 2001
“Safe Sedation of Children undergoing Diagnostic and Therapeutic procedures”
“Conscious Sedation in the Provision of Dental Care”
SDAC 2003
8. “A Conscious Decision”
“A Conscious Decision” DOH 2000
Emphasises the need to provide alternatives to GA for pain and anxiety management.
9. “Maintaining Standards”
“A dentist who assumes the dual responsibility of sedating the patient as well as providing treatment must:”
“be able to justify the use of the method selected with reference to current guidelines…”
GDC Maintaining Standards Nov 2001
10. “SIGN Guidelines” “Safe Sedation of Children Undergoing Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures – A national clinical guideline”
Relates to those under age of 16 years
Published in Feb 2002
www.sign.ac.uk
11. Main Recommendations: Dental Sedation Nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation sedation
“is recommended for use in all dental settings but particularly General Dental Practice and Community Dental Service”
12. Main Recommendations Dental Sedation
Intravenous Sedation
“Single agent sedation with midazolam is only recommended for IV dental sedation in patients over 16 years of age. IV sedation should be avoided in younger children in primary or community dental practice.”
13. Main Recommendations Dental Sedation
Other Routes
“other routes of drug administration including the oral, rectal and intra-nasal route have no advantages over inhalation and intravenous sedation and should be restricted to a hospital setting…”
14. “Conscious Sedation in the provision of Dental care”
Aim
“To lay down specific guidance for the practice of Conscious Sedation in general dental practice, community and hospital settings”
SDAC 2003
15. Main Recommendations for sedation in adolescents
Must only be undertaken by teams which have adequate training and experience
Nitrous oxide/oxygen should be first choice
16. Main Recommendations for sedation in adolescents
IV sedation only appropriate in a minority of cases
Oral/Intranasal/Transmucosal sedation should only be administered under appropriate circumstances by a practitioner experienced in their use
17. Current Sedation Practice
Sedation is considered a safe alternative to GA for dental procedures
Inhalation Sedation mainstay for those under the age of 16
Chronic exposure to nitrous oxide
May not be accepted by some patients
18. Current Sedation Practice
A need to consider other forms of sedation
Benzodiazepines have favourable pharmacology
Limited research into the use of midazolam in dental patients under the age of 16 in UK
19. A study of the use of Benzodiazepines in adolescent dental patients
20. Midazolam Most favourable pharmacology of BZDs
Used extensively in adults via the IV route
Limited use in those under 16 years
May provide an alternative where inhalation sedation contraindicated
21. Midazolam – clinical effects Anxiolysis
Sedation
Muscle relaxation
Amnesia
22. Midazolam – side effects Respiratory depression
Drug interactions
CNS depressants
Antibiotics
Antacids
Tolerance
Dis-inhibition
23. Advantages Can be titrated (IV route)
Potent anxiolytic effect
Amnesia
Muscle relaxation
24. Disadvantages May require IV cannulation
Length of appointment time
Side effects (minimal)
Dis-inhibition
26. A STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BUCCAL MIDAZOLAM SEDATION FOR ORTHODONTIC EXTRACTIONS
27. Aim of Research Project Effectiveness and acceptability of midazolam for dental extractions in adolescent patients
Different routes researched
Oral (Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 860-867)
Intravenous (British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003 Dec)
Transmucosal
28. Transmucosal Sedation Routes
Sublingual
Intranasal
Buccal
Rectal (not in UK)
Advantages
Rapid absorption
Avoids 1st pass metabolism
Disadvantages
Taste
Irritation of tissues
29. Buccal Midazolam Concentrated formulation – 10mg/ml
Produced by Special Products
Formulated for use in Epileptic Patients
30. METHOD
Prospective, randomised, crossover trial
40 patients, aged 10 to 16 years, ASA I & II
Referred for orthodontic extractions
31. METHOD Two treatment sessions
2 extractions - buccal midazolam sedation
2 extractions - nitrous oxide sedation
Children randomly allocated to receive nitrous oxide or midazolam at first visit
Information and consent at assessment
32. BUCCAL MIDAZOLAM SEDATION Buccal midazolam (0.2mg/kg) 10-15 minutes pre-op
Monitored by sedation trained Dental Nurse
Treatment carried out (LA & Extractions)
Recovery
Discharged when fit
33. NITROUS OXIDE SEDATION
Nitrous oxide titrated 10% every minute
(max 30%)
Treatment carried out (LA & Extractions)
Recovery
Discharged when fit
34. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
35. PHYSIOLOGICAL STATUS Baseline
BP, Pulse, Weight, Respiratory Rate,
Oxygen Saturation
Every 2 minutes
Pulse, Respiratory Rate, Oxygen Saturation
36. LEVEL OF SEDATION “Classification of Emotional Status” (Brietkopf & Buttner)
Recorded every 2 minutes
Four point scale
1 – irritated & awake
2 – awake & calm
3 – tired, hardly moving
4 – drowsy, without reaction but rousable
37. BEHAVIOUR DURING TREATMENT “Frankl Behaviour Rating Scale”
Recorded every 2 minutes
Four point scale:
1 – Refusal / Distress
2 – Uncooperative / Reluctant
3 – Cooperative / Reserved
4 – Interested / Enjoyed
38. OUTCOME OF TREATEMTENT & OVERALL BEHAVIOUR “Houpt Behaviour Rating Scale”
Recorded at end of visit
Six point scale:
1 – Aborted 4 – Good
2 – Poor 5 – Very good
3 – Fair 6 – Excellent
39. POST-OPERATIVELY Post-operative Questionnaire
Recall of treatment
Same sedation again
Preference for sedation
Side effects
40. RECALL OF TREATMENT Patients were asked if they could remember:
Receiving the local anaesthetic
Having the extractions carried out
Being in recovery
41. PATIENT’S OPINION OF TREATMENT Patients were asked:
Would you have this sedation again?
Which type of sedation did you prefer?
42. RESULTS
43. SUBJECTS 20 to date
Mean age 12.8 years (10-15 yrs)
19 ASA I, 1 ASA II
44. PHYSIOLOGICAL STATUS Mean Dose
Midazolam = 9.9mg ( 6.8-16mg)
Nitrous Oxide = 30%
Lowest O2 saturation
Midazolam = mean 96.8% (range 95-99%)
Nitrous oxide = mean 97.9% (range 95-100%)
45. MEAN DURATION FOR SEDATION & TREATMENT Time to Maximum Level of Sedation
Midazolam = mean 15.2 mins(8-20mins)
Nitrous oxide = mean 6.9 mins (2-10 mins)
Treatment time (La & ext)
Midazolam = mean 9.9 mins (6-16 mins)
Nitrous oxide = mean 7.7 mins (4-22 mins)
46. MEAN DURATION FOR RECOVERY & TOTAL APPOINTMENT Time in recovery
Midazolam = mean 41.2 mins (28-64 mins)
Nitrous oxide = mean 21.5 mins (20-22 mins)
Total appointment time
Midazolam = mean 66.3 mins (60-90 mins)
Nitrous oxide = mean 34.1 mins (28-48 mins)
47. OVERALL BEHAVIOUR
48. POSITIVE RECALL OF STAGES OF APPOINTMENT
49. PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRES 2 patients failed to return their post operative questionnaires.
The following results are based on 18 patients
50. PATIENT PREFERENCE 66% would have Midazolam again
89% would have Nitrous oxide again
33% preferred Midazolam
50% preferred Nitrous oxide
17% had no preference
51. REASONS FOR PREFERENCE Nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation
Quicker
Felt more relaxed
Recovered more quickly
Midazolam
Felt more relaxed
Remembered less
52. BEST ABOUT TREATMENT Nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation
Quicker
Felt more relaxed
Nothing
Midazolam
Felt more relaxed
Quickness
Felt no pain
53. WORST ABOUT TREATMENT Nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation
Being aware
Gums being frozen
Noises
Midazolam
Gums being frozen
Taste
Time for sedation to work
54. REPORTED SIDE EFFECTS Nitrous oxide/oxygen sedation
Sleepy – 3 subjects
Headache – 1 subject
Midazolam
Sleepy – 3 subjects
Headache – 2 subjects
55. CONCLUSION Promising results to date
Buccal midazolam appears to be an acceptable technique
The trial is on going
“Watch this space”
56. SUMMARY Guidelines for conscious sedation
Current sedation techniques employed
Study of Benzodiazepines
Buccal midazolam trial