190 likes | 206 Views
This study focuses on the synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of highly dispersed bimetallic catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. The aim is to create a Pt-promoted bimetallic catalyst with a high degree of metal-metal interaction to improve CO dissociation and prevent carbonaceous deposit buildup. Monometallic catalysts and bimetallic catalysts were prepared using electroless deposition (ED) and characterized using XRD, STEM, chemisorption, and TPR. The preliminary reaction results show promising potential for improving Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.
E N D
Synthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of Highly Dispersed Bimetallic Catalysts for Fischer-TropschReaction John Meynard M. Tengco,WeijianDiao, John R. Monnier and John R. Regalbuto* University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 (USA) June 6, 2013
Fischer – Tropsch Synthesis • Syngas (CO, H2) • High P, Moderate T • Adsorption CO dissociation C addition Hydrogenation • Longer chain HC’s • CO dissociation may be efficient • Hydrogenation issues • C buildup (fouling) • Loss of active sites • CO dissociation should be coupled with facile hydrogenation to prevent carbonaceous deposit buildup • Hypothesis: We can use Electroless Deposition (ED) to rationally synthesize a Pt-promoted bimetallic catalyst with the required high degree of metal 1 – metal 2 interaction.
Rationale for Bimetallic Catalyst Synthesis • Combine properties of individual catalyst components • Effective C-O dissociation (e.g. Ru, Fe, Co) • Good Hydrogenation Activity (e.g. Pt) vs
Electroless Deposition (ED) • (A) Immersion in electroless developer bath, (B) activation with reducing agent, RA; (C) reduction-deposition of second metal, (D) catalytic ED, (E) auto-catalytic ED • Catalytic to auto-catalytic ED can produce core-shell
Galvanic Displacement • Proceeds as long as primary metal can be oxidized and reduction of secondary metal is favored (galvanic exchange)
Experiment Outline • Catalyst Preparation • Monometallic Catalysts • Proof of principle done on SiO2 support instead of C • Bimetallic Catalyst Synthesis • Characterization • XRD, STEM, Chemisorption, TPR of O-precovered catalyst • Evaluation • Preliminary reaction results
Bimetallic Catalyst Preparation (ED) • Target θtheo=0.5ML Pt, based on active sites determined by chemisorption • Pt precursor: H2PtCl6 • Reducing Agent: DMAB • Sodium Citrate for bath stability • DMAB : NaCit : Pt = 6/5/1 • pH 10, 70°C • 1.5g catalyst in 300mL (0.5g/100mL)
Catalyst Characterization: XRD • 4.5nm particle size for Ru • Presence of Pt peaks in DI sample (separate phase)
Catalyst Characterization: XRD • 3nm particle size for Co in calcined (as Co3O4) and reduced sample • DI and ED sample have different (I still have to figure this out) phase
Catalyst Characterization: XRD • 3nm particle size for Co in calcined (as Co3O4) and reduced sample • DI and ED sample have different (I still have to figure this out) phase
Catalyst Characterization • TPR of O pre-covered catalyst • (currently doing this) • Done (4): Ru, Pt(ED)-Ru, Co, Fe, • Running: Pt(ED)-Co • To be done(4): Pt(ED)-Fe, Pt(DI) series
Catalyst Characterization • STEM??
Catalyst Characterization • STEM??