200 likes | 556 Views
2. Myth Buster. Federal Law does not limit the fee charged a telecommunications company for access to public rights-of-way to recovery of costs.Federal law permits up to a 5% gross revenue fee for PROW use by cable.CAVEAT: Your state may have passed limitations on fees and charges that may be assessed a public right of way occupant..
E N D
1. Public Right-of-Way: Legal/Policy Issues
2. 2 Myth Buster Federal Law does not limit the fee charged a telecommunications company for access to public rights-of-way to recovery of costs.
Federal law permits up to a 5% gross revenue fee for PROW use by cable.
CAVEAT: Your state may have passed limitations on fees and charges that may be assessed a public right of way occupant. Some state laws limit local governments to cost recovery
Iowa: management costs caused by utility’s occupation of the ROW
Missouri: limitations established by SB 369 – scope unclear – some cities grandfathered
others: e.g., Alaska, Indiana, Minnesota
Some state laws limit local governments to cost recovery
Iowa: management costs caused by utility’s occupation of the ROW
Missouri: limitations established by SB 369 – scope unclear – some cities grandfathered
others: e.g., Alaska, Indiana, Minnesota
3. 3 What are Rights-of-Way Public rights-of-way (PROW) are real, tangible, limited, and valuable real estate.
4. 4 Guiding Principle Sound economics and political equity require that private entities using public property for private profit should pay fair and reasonable rents. Failure to capture the fair value for the use of these assets transfers real estate costs from company stockholders to taxpayers.
5. 5 What is a Franchise? A Grant of a Special Privilege
A License to Use PROW
Revocable
Personal (does not travel with estate)
“Burdens” the real estate
Not a Privilege to Offer a Service
Broad Confusion Between These Two
6. 6 Federal Law -- Yields to State Law 5th Amendment US Constitution:
Federal Law May NOT Preempt State Property Law
Cities have same rights as citizens
47 USC Sec. 253(c)
47 USC Sec. 332(c)(7)
7. 7 Federal Law Reserves for Local Government: Property Rights
Right to Charge Rent
Right to Manage Behavior in ROW
Right to zone and site antennas and towers
8. 8 State Property Law Controls Same Principles as other Property Rights
Must Hold a Right to Burden the Property (Right to “Use”) from the Owner
“Estate in Fee”/Lease/Easement/ Franchise/or License (Explicit or Implicit) Required
9. 9 Fundamental PROW Dispute Is “franchise” a regulatory relationship?
Is “franchise” a property interest?
10. 10 Leading Cases were Determined by Answer Dearborn; Cablevision of Boston: right to occupy PROW is property interest, subject to state property law.
Auburn; Prince Georges II; Chattanooga: PROW occupancy is a regulatory interest, subject to state and federal regulatory exclusion.
Coral Springs: If gov’t action prohibits, OK if related to property interests
11. 11 History The Supreme Court, as early as 1893, in City of St. Louis v. Western Union Tel., recognized that local governments have a property right in controlling all elements and benefits of rights-of-way property and that the payment of a franchise fee is not a tax but a rental fee.
City of St. Louis v. Western Union Tel., 148 U.S. 92 (1893), opinion on reh’g, 149 U.S. 465 (1893).
City of Dallas v. FCC, 118 F.3d 393, 397 (5th Cir. 1997).
12. 12 Rights transferred to a PROW franchisee ROW franchisees gain 3 types of rights:
option to place facilities in ROW – burden of potential use
construction and maintenance rights for facilities actually installed – actual burden
Ongoing use or occupation of ROW to do business
In a free market, property owner has a right to charge a fair market price
13. 13 Valuing Public Rights-of-Way Three kinds of compensation correspond to the three valuable rights:
annual option payment – possibly fixed sum
payment for facilities actually installed – possibly linear or cubic measure
fair market value for value derived by private user from public property – possibly measured by gross revenue
14. 14 Cost vs. Value Industry argues that under 47 U.S.C. § 253 compensation is limited to costs
There is no reference to costs in § 253
The legislative history of § 253 refers to gross revenues; does not imply costs
Nonetheless, some courts have succumbed to industry’s “access” argument, ignoring property rights
15. 15 Section 253 (c) STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY. -- Nothing in this section affects the authority of a State or local government to manage the public rights-of-way or to require fair and reasonable compensation from telecommunications providers, on a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis, for use of public rights-of-way on a nondiscriminatory basis, if the compensation required is publicly disclosed by such government.
16. 16 Measures of ROW Value Where compensation is permitted, different ways of determining amount may be used (subject to state law):
Linear foot fee
Gross revenues-based fee
Throughput-based fee
Access line fee
253: Are local franchise requirements to provide in-kind facilities “prohibitions?” -- pending, but probably OK
17. 17 Section 253 in the States Legislatures
21 States have acted
10 permit gross revenue charges
PUCs
Challenging local government as 3rd tier of regulations.
eg: Minn/Md/Mich/Oreg There is a copy of the state-by-state summary in the handout. Also remind folks that it is up on the website.There is a copy of the state-by-state summary in the handout. Also remind folks that it is up on the website.
18. 18 Has Your State Chosen?
The Maryland legislature has not acted in this context.
At least some Maryland cities retain full authority to charge for use of ROWs.
19. 19 Has Your Municipality Chosen? General ordinances:
St. Louis: linear foot charge starting at $1.50 in 1991 with inflation adj., now $1.88 (2004-05)
Little Rock, AR: 5% of gross revenues
Particular agreements:
Los Angeles (through 2002): $5 per linear foot of 6” conduit; $1.25 per linear foot overhead
Eugene, OR: $4-5 per linear foot, or in kind
20. 20 Limited to Costs Some state laws limit local governments to cost recovery
Iowa: management costs caused by utility’s occupation of the ROW
Missouri: limitations established by SB 369 – scope unclear – some cities grandfathered
others: e.g., Alaska, Indiana, Minnesota
But the game is not over…
21. 21 Identifying Costs Not all state laws limited categories of costs.
Acquisition fees for obtaining rights-of-way
Administrative or processing costs
Inspection costs
Costs of safety precautions for ROW work
Costs of locates and conflict resolution
Cost of repairing & maintaining the ROW
Construction costs for ROW improvements
Costs to community from delays, etc.