1 / 40

Clinical Competency:

Clinical Competency:. Academic and Technical Standards Of A Program. Academic and Technical Standards. A program can set academic and technical standards for its students. Example: Academic Standard. Earn at least 84 semester hours of credit while Maintaining a cumulative average of C or 70.

danno
Download Presentation

Clinical Competency:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Clinical Competency: Academic and Technical Standards Of A Program

  2. Academic and Technical Standards • A program can set academic and technical standards for its students

  3. Example: Academic Standard • Earn at least 84 semester hours of credit while • Maintaining a cumulative average of C or 70

  4. Example: Technical Standard • Independently, observe the patient/client accurately • Integrate all information received by whatever senses employed

  5. What Is A Technical Standard? • All nonacademic* admissions criteria • Must be met by student • To enable student to participate in and successfully complete the chosen program • Including behavioral, professional and intellectual standards

  6. Purpose Of Technical Standards • Assist the professional school in selecting retaining and graduating those applicants and students best qualified to complete the required training

  7. Authorization For Technical Standards • Title II of the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act • Must be reasonable • Based on legitimate educational goals of the program • Must be clearly identified in the student handbook, field manuals, institutional catalogs, and/or program brochures

  8. Notification • Student must have reasonable notice • Standards must be in writing • Brochures • Admissions application • Affidavit

  9. Continual Monitoring • Performance must be continually monitored from entrance to graduation • Progress reports, written evaluations • Prevents unqualified students from making it to graduation and then being told at the last minute they may not graduate

  10. Criteria for Decisions • Subjective grading should be a rational exercise of discretion • Students must have access and be made aware of the criteria for making such decisions

  11. Following the Standards • Include the consequences for inadequate performance and removal procedures • Immediate notification by University of deficiencies in performance and possibility of failure or expulsion • Give opportunity to remedy deficient areas

  12. Follow the Procedures • Decisions made in good faith, not arbitrarily or capriciously • The University must follow its procedures once a decision for unsatisfactory performance has been made • Students should be entitled to a hearing prior to dismissal

  13. Example of Procedure • Purpose and scope of rules • Responsibilities and rights • Composition of the council • Violations of the rules

  14. Example of Procedure - Cont’d • Procedures • Sanctions • Appeals • Honor/professional ethics education • Amendments

  15. Example • Continuing student in a clinical program • Monitor progress reports and written evaluations • If at any time the student’s conduct or behavior is deemed to endanger the health and safety of that individual or others, notify the student immediately • Follow procedures for reevaluation or removal if necessary

  16. Disabilities • University should make every reasonable effort to allow otherwise qualified persons with disabilities to engage in their programs • Including making reasonable accommodations in response to a request by an individual with a disability

  17. Otherwise Qualified • Otherwise qualified • Can the disabled person satisfy the program’s requirements despite the disability • One who is able to meet all of a program’s requirements in spite of the disability

  18. What Is A Disability • The mental or physical condition must substantially limit a major life activity, • The person has a record of such an impairment, or • The person is regarded as having such an impairment

  19. What Is A Major Life Activity • Caring for one’s self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working • Important life activities are restricted as to the conditions, manner, or duration under which they can be performed in comparison to most people

  20. Types Of Claims • ADA and Section 504 • Contract claims • Negligence

  21. University of Missouri v. Horowitz • Medical student was evaluated according to procedure during final year • Failed evaluation due to poor performance on a rotation • Council voted to dismiss the student

  22. Holding • A subjective, expert evaluation is required to determine whether an individual’s performance satisfies a predetermined set of standards • That standard is set by a similar academic judgment • This type of judgment is no less academic even though it measures actual conditions of practice rather than a grade for written answers

  23. Southeastern Community College v. Davis • Davis applied to the College’s nursing program • Serious hearing disability • Refused to admit because the College determined that her hearing disability would interfere with her safely caring for patients

  24. Holding • Section 504 does not limit an educational institution’s requirement that a prospective student must meet reasonable physical qualifications for admissions into a clinical training program • Not required to lower or substantially alter its standards in order to accommodate a disabled person

  25. Anderson v. University of Wisconsin, et al • Law student dismissed due to poor academic performance caused by alcoholism • Student did not maintain sufficient average as required by the law school • Threatened fellow student while drunk

  26. Holding • Can consider academic performance and sobriety when deciding whether an applicant is entitled to an education • Student with below the required average is not qualified to stay UNLESS he can show that the source of the academic problem has been abated

  27. Professor Liability • Generally, as long as the professor was acting within the scope of their authority, there should not be individual liability

  28. Developing The Standards • Should be defined as the essential functions that the student must demonstrate in order to fulfill the requirements of a program • They are pre-requisites for entrance, continuation, promotion, retention, and graduation from the University

  29. Cont’d • Connect technical standards with the licensing requirements necessary for a profession

  30. General Categories • Observation • Communication • Sensory and motor function • Intellectual, conceptual, integrative and quantitative abilities, and • Behavioral and social

  31. Necessity • Explain why the requirement is necessary

  32. Purpose • Each student must successfully fulfill the prerequisites for admissions, continuation and graduation from the program

  33. ADA • Include a statement concerning the ADA

  34. Procedure For Notification and Review • The materials distributed to prospective students should include academic and technical standards for notification purposes • Clearly define suspension and dismissal procedures • Clearly define appeal procedure • Strictly follow

  35. Criminal Background • Courts generally hold that a University may deny or revoke admissions because of a prospective student’s past criminal record • Crime may not be compatible with University’s goals or values, or • Prospective student failed to disclose – accurately or completely – information on the application

  36. Off-Site Clinics and Internships • Student’s skills and abilities • Specific needs in the clinical setting • Goals and purposes of the program • Potential impact of the requested accommodation on the program AND on the quality of education the student would receive • Availability of alternatives

  37. Monitor the Site • Imperative for the University to be familiar with the site and monitor the off-site program • Ensures the student is receiving a meaningful opportunity to participate in the program • Safety of site itself

  38. Summary • Notification and awareness • Clarity of standard • Monitor consistently • Strict application of any procedure in place

  39. Sources • Anderson v. University of Wisconsin, et al., 841 F.2d 737 (1988). • Board of Curators of The University of Missouri et al. v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78 (1978). • Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397 (1979). • St. Thomas University, 23 NDLR (LRP) 160 (2001).

  40. Sources – Cont’d • Derek Langhauser, Use of Criminal Convictions in College Admissions, 154 WELR 733 (2001). • ADA Title III Technical Assistance Manual athttp://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/taman3.html. • SYNFAX WEEKLY REPORT, Week of April 20, Insuring Clinical Competency (1998). • Patty Gibbs, Gatekeeping in Social Work Education, BPD GATEKEEPING WORKSHOP, (October, 1998). • University of Massachusetts Medical School Technical Standardsat http://www.umassmed.edu//som/adm.

More Related