1 / 10

Corrugate Reduction Farmland Foods, Lincoln

Corrugate Reduction Farmland Foods, Lincoln. This presentation includes:. Explanation of the project Reductions related to the project Costs and Payback Overview.

dante-chambers
Download Presentation

Corrugate Reduction Farmland Foods, Lincoln

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Corrugate ReductionFarmland Foods, Lincoln

  2. This presentation includes: • Explanation of the project • Reductions related to the project • Costs and Payback • Overview

  3. -FY-2010: Lincoln installed two IPAK TF-300CT tray formers. Along with these tray formers, an automated conveying system was installed to distribute formed boxes to the lines demanding them. -By changing the amount of corrugate used in our S-11 and S-6 boxes, we were able to reduce the carbon footprint through the life cycle of manufacturing the cardboard. This includes reductions in raw materials and energy used to create the material. -An added benefit from this project was the reduction of operation’s labor needed to assemble and prepare boxes

  4. Calculated Reductions • -Wood Reduction To Produce Corrugate = 552 tons = 25.5% • -Net Energy to Produce Corrugate = 7,451 MM BTU’s = 25.5% • -Greenhouse Gas to Produce Corrugate = 1,269,550 lbs CO2 = 25.5% • -Wastewater at Corrugate Plant = 2,093,468 gallons = 25.5% • -Solid Waste Reduction at Corrugate Plant =259,657 lbs = 25.5% • -Carbon Footprint Reduction = 0.97 lbs CO2 = 25.3% • -Non Renewable Energy Savings = 8.83 MBTU = 25.3% • -Renewable Energy Savings = 10.52 MBTU = 25.6%

  5. Savings: Projected vs. Actual

  6. Savings Defined • Savings were projected from FY09 Production total of 119,298,343 pounds. First year use of IPAKs, production was down 7,285,250 pounds.

  7. Cost Justification and Payback

  8. Overview What was the purpose of the project? -Reduce labor costs and material costs, while increasing efficiency. What environmental impacts did this project have? -Many reductions in energy needed to make materials.

More Related