1 / 21

LCcal * : a Calorimeter prototype for future Linear Colliders

LCcal * : a Calorimeter prototype for future Linear Colliders. TALK SUMMARY. Design principles Prototype description Construction details Test Beam results Conclusions and Future plans.

dante
Download Presentation

LCcal * : a Calorimeter prototype for future Linear Colliders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LCcal*: a Calorimeter prototype for future Linear Colliders TALK SUMMARY • Design principles • Prototype description • Construction details • Test Beam results • Conclusions and Future plans * Contributors (Como, ITE-Warsaw, LNF, Padova, Trieste): M. Alemi, A.Anashkin, M. Anelli, M.Bettini, S.Bertolucci, E. Borsato, M. Caccia, P.C, C. Fanin, J.Marczewski, S. Miscetti, B.Nadalut, M. Nicoletto, M. Prest, R. Peghin, L. Ramina, F. Simonetto, E. Vallazza …. P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  2. Design principles From the LC Physics requirements: Tesla TDR solutions: • Si W • Shashlik (thanks to CALEIDO) • Cristals • Fully compensating Ecal+Hcal Alternatives: Proposed solution: Keep SiW advantages (flat geometry, high granularity) Erec. not from Si but from Scintillator-WLS fibers Reduce (factor >10) the number of channels P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  3. Prototype description Pb/Sc+Si • 45 layers • 25 × 25 × 0.3 cm3 Pb • 25 × 25 × 0.3 cm3 Scint.: 25 cells 5 × 5 cm2 • 3 planes: • 252 .9 × .9 cm2 Si Pads • at: 2, 6, 12 X0 Scintillation light transported with WLS σ tail fibers: Cell separation with grooves in Sc. plates with Tyvec strips inside Coupled with clear fibers (to PM) P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  4. Prototype (cntd) 3 Siplanes • Goal: shower-shower separation, position measurement, e/h identification: • Pad dimension< shower dimension:.9x.9 cm2 • Longitudinal sampling:3 planes • Analogic RO VA hdr9c from IDEas • See A. Bulgheroni’s talk for details Pad diode ac(old)-dc(new) coupled Actual design: - Detector: 6x7 pads - Plane: 3x2 detectors pcb contact with conductive glue P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  5. 3 mm Kuraray SCSN-61 (25x25 cm2) 3 mm Bicron BC-408 (25x25 cm2) Construction details:Scintillator Machined with vacuum plate as holder Whole Production (>50 tiles) done in september 2002 P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  6. Fibers: Kuraray 1mm d. Y11 300 ppm multicladding Face polished and aluminized by sputtering To make the 2.4 cm radius curvature : middle temperature(500-700) oven Splicing with optical glue and a supporting tube : stable in >30 day time P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  7. Detector Assembling: 45 Layers calorimeter prototype completely built in 2002 Fibres grouped into 25x4 bundles making a 4-fold longitudinal segmentation. Slots for the insertion of the 3 Si pad planes (Motherboard). Mechanical support for Photomultipliers in the 3x3 central cells P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  8. detector LINAC Beam 1-500 mA W slits tunable W target: 1.7, 2.0, 2.3 X0 450 magnet Test beam activity • after a 2002 pre test with the 1st layer only(2.1 X0) at CERN • two runs at Frascati Beam Test Facility (n × 50 – 750 MeV) it is possible to tune the multeplicity..... • run at CERN SPS H6 beam line (e/ 5 – 150 GeV) All tests: two beam position monitors (telescope) put in front of the calorimeter. • - Each detector consisting of 400400 x–y Si strips with a pitch of 240 m • - They cover the central area of the prototype (9.5  9.5 cm2) LCcal trigger beam

  9. define ‘cell’ as the calibrated sum of the 4 longitudinal layers on the same lateral position: Ci=bij=1,4ajLij(4-1+9-1+16 parameters) • process in two steps: • equalise the layer response at the same incoming energy Lij=bk/bi Lkj • minimise the Energy spread on the sum of 9 cells(iterative process)aj|min. widthEcal=n=1,9Cn Test beam activity : detector calibration L4 L3 L2 L1 Ci Si L3 Si L2 Si L1 P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  10. Good linearity vs molteplicity 1 e- 2 e- 3 e- Test beam results: Linearity and Energy Resolution BTF test EE 11.5%E Ebeam (MeV) • Photoelectron statistics negligble • Stocastic Term11.5% as in MC • Light disuniformity <<10% Effects on resolution to be measured at SPS (August 2003) Cern TB 2002 Nphe>5.1 /layer →Cal(45 layers) ~ 250 MeV/Mip ~ 800Npe/GeV OK also @ BTF (E ~500 MeV) P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  11. Cern TB 2003 Test beam results: Linearity and Energy Resolution EE pm saturates confirmed at high energy !!! Ecal (GeV) e- 11.1%E Ebeam (GeV) Ebeam (GeV) 75 GeV 15 GeV e- P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP Ecal (GeV) Ecal (GeV)

  12. =2.45 mm =2.16 mm e- Test beam results: Si pad detector (Position Meas.) Cern TB 2003 y pad Si L2 (cm) 30 GeV electrons y telescope (cm) Si L1+L2 =3.27 mm =1.76 mm Si L3 Si L2 Si L1 P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP y pad –y telescope (cm)

  13. Test beam results: Si pad detector (Position Meas.) PRELIMINARY analysis: pad noise subtraction not optimised Position resolution  2.5mm not far from Monte Carlo 10 GeV electrons 10 GeV simulated electrons =2.5 mm P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  14. 30 GeV e- Cern TB 2003 Test beam results: uniformity in (light) Energy response disuniformity < 2% correction from pad reconstruction can be applied! Ecal (GeV) x telescope ± 2% PRELIMINARY: cell border effects dominated by residual miscalibration x pad x (cm) ± 2% Cj y(cm) x telescope Cj-1 x pad x (cm) Ecal (GeV)

  15. Test beam results: ( e/ rejection) the redundancy of the information on the linear/lateral shower development makes the rejection very easy (difficult to quantify below 10-3 due to beam contamination) Cern TB 2003 30 GeV e- 30 GeV e- 30 GeV 30 GeV E Si pad Layer 1 E cal Layer 1 50 GeV e- Si pad Layer 2 30 GeV e- 30 GeV 75 GeV shower variance:

  16. Test beam results: Si Pad two particle separation exhaustive analysis not fully accomplished Two electrons with energy 750 MeV X silicon chambers Y silicon chambers First layer BTF test Second layer NB: not fully equipped+ problematic channels Third layer P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  17. Conclusions and Future plans • A calorimeter prototype with the proposed technique has been built and fully tested. All the results are preliminary. • Energy and position resolution as expected: E/E ~11.-11.5% /E, pos~2 mm (@ 30 GeV) • Light uniformity acceptable. • e/ rejection very good ( <10-3). • Two particle separation results coming soon. • Next steps: include a calorimeter made following this technique into the general LC simulation and Pattern recognition. • Combined test with Hcal (?) P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  18. backup P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  19. Detector Assembling: P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

  20. PM’s Fibres with PM support structure Fibres faced to PMs Scintill. Piani Si P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP LCCAL in test @ BTF (Frascati)

  21. 4 layers m.i.p.→check light output and uniformity in Light collection: Ratio signal/sigma →lower limit for photoelectrons Test beam results CALORIMETER (2.1 X0) Nphe>5.1 /layer → cal(45layers):>220 phe/m.i.p. good uniformity: Simulated Light collection disunifority(20%) P. Checchia Como 8th ICATPP

More Related